mpharris36 wrote:KnixinSix wrote:douggood wrote:what hollinger wrote about the aprons and parity today.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5525723/2024/06/02/is-the-nba-in-the-middle-of-a-new-age-of-parity-or-is-it-about-to-exit-one/
Guys like Markenen, DeJounte and Bridges. All contracts under 25M a year are going to have even greater value now. This is why it surprised me we didn't give up two picks for DeJounte Murray. He is locked up at 25M a year for the next 3 years.
Think DeJounte would have made a HUGE difference in the playoffs personally especially when we had all those injuries.
I really don't Dejounte as a good fit next to brunson. He hasn't been a good fit next to high usage guard like Brunson...and he hasn't been an impactful defender. Not sure he's willing to take an off ball backseat role to Brunson and not sure he does the off ball stuff we would need from that roll.
Markenen and Bridges make more sense just don't know what it would take to get either from Utah or the Nets respectively.
Murray sucks next to brunson because he's a high volume low efficiency player.
brunson is already high volume
randle is already high volume
Lauri is a fit next to brunson because he's a low volume high efficiency guy that can c+s on top of any defender.
but
while he';s an upgrade over randle, he's not a 4frps + randle upgrade.

























