Guano wrote:Some of you have a thing for bigs that play finesse hoops and its really unbecoming.
There's 5 bigs in this series impacting the games, 3 of them are finesse. Some of us like winning players and can see past the iso ball.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Guano wrote:Some of you have a thing for bigs that play finesse hoops and its really unbecoming.
Iron Mantis wrote:Still searching that elusive, first correct basketball take..
"Ball Knowers"...........
They are not serious people.![]()
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Guano wrote:Some of you have a thing for bigs that play finesse hoops and its really unbecoming.
There's 5 bigs in this series impacting the games, 3 of them are finesse. Some of us like winning players and can see past the iso ball.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Guano wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Guano wrote:Some of you have a thing for bigs that play finesse hoops and its really unbecoming.
There's 5 bigs in this series impacting the games, 3 of them are finesse. Some of us like winning players and can see past the iso ball.
Longing over a bench player who runs like shaggy and gives you a decent game every once in awhile - couldnt be me.
I have standards.
Guano wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Guano wrote:Some of you have a thing for bigs that play finesse hoops and its really unbecoming.
There's 5 bigs in this series impacting the games, 3 of them are finesse. Some of us like winning players and can see past the iso ball.
Longing over a bench player who runs like shaggy and gives you a decent game every once in awhile - couldnt be me.
I have standards.
rajajackal wrote:Guano wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
There's 5 bigs in this series impacting the games, 3 of them are finesse. Some of us like winning players and can see past the iso ball.
Longing over a bench player who runs like shaggy and gives you a decent game every once in awhile - couldnt be me.
I have standards.
he's from new york and he's very good at off ball hoops what's not to like
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Guano wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
There's 5 bigs in this series impacting the games, 3 of them are finesse. Some of us like winning players and can see past the iso ball.
Longing over a bench player who runs like shaggy and gives you a decent game every once in awhile - couldnt be me.
I have standards.
Longing is fine when you're rubbing it in the face of another. As in, Ball knowers are down preposterous amounts. Ball up top.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Guano wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Guano wrote:
Longing over a bench player who runs like shaggy and gives you a decent game every once in awhile - couldnt be me.
I have standards.
Longing is fine when you're rubbing it in the face of another. As in, Ball knowers are down preposterous amounts. Ball up top.
Im all for flipping meLo sht. But I have a rep. they're is enough ammo i wouldn't have to sully my rep by gassing up a mid big.
Guano wrote:rajajackal wrote:Guano wrote:
Longing over a bench player who runs like shaggy and gives you a decent game every once in awhile - couldnt be me.
I have standards.
he's from new york and he's very good at off ball hoops what's not to like
He wasn't good here, poor defender, tried fighting our coach, a pacer, took a shot at Brunson, and runs like thisSpoiler:
rajajackal wrote:Guano wrote:rajajackal wrote:he's from new york and he's very good at off ball hoops what's not to like
He wasn't good here, poor defender, tried fighting our coach, a pacer, took a shot at Brunson, and runs like thisSpoiler:
he was good here though. nowhere near as good as randle, which is why he had no place on that version of the roster, but we should have sought a better package of assets for him. i understand it's ultimately his fault in that crashing out on the coach is why they were in a rush to give him away, even if for free. but crashing out on the coach is some other new york **** i enjoyed honestly and i'm a thibs fan lmao
3toheadmelo wrote:rajajackal wrote:Guano wrote:
He wasn't good here, poor defender, tried fighting our coach, a pacer, took a shot at Brunson, and runs like thisSpoiler:
he was good here though. nowhere near as good as randle, which is why he had no place on that version of the roster, but we should have sought a better package of assets for him. i understand it's ultimately his fault in that crashing out on the coach is why they were in a rush to give him away, even if for free. but crashing out on the coach is some other new york **** i enjoyed honestly and i'm a thibs fan lmao
The only neutral take on Obi I can respect lol
3toheadmelo wrote:Barbz still crashing out over Obi Bargnani?
god shammgod wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Barbz still crashing out over Obi Bargnani?
I don’t really care about this and I have no idea what ball knowers is about, but if you were claiming Rj was a future star you should probably slow down before talking about anybody else’s takes. lol
god shammgod wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Barbz still crashing out over Obi Bargnani?
I don’t really care about this and I have no idea what ball knowers is about, but if you were claiming Rj was a future star you should probably slow down before talking about anybody else’s takes. lol
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:god shammgod wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Barbz still crashing out over Obi Bargnani?
I don’t really care about this and I have no idea what ball knowers is about, but if you were claiming Rj was a future star you should probably slow down before talking about anybody else’s takes. lol
There is no take, nothing at all, that will ever top his mental breakdown over Randle. He took so many multi front L's, so many that the board needed the feds to come in and shake things up. The only way I will get a better laugh is if two posters meet up and film themselves actually fighting.
Needing the next man to come talk for him is nasty too, does Brooklyn know you're doing pro bono defense work?
god shammgod wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:god shammgod wrote:
I don’t really care about this and I have no idea what ball knowers is about, but if you were claiming Rj was a future star you should probably slow down before talking about anybody else’s takes. lol
There is no take, nothing at all, that will ever top his mental breakdown over Randle. He took so many multi front L's, so many that the board needed the feds to come in and shake things up. The only way I will get a better laugh is if two posters meet up and film themselves actually fighting.
Needing the next man to come talk for him is nasty too, does Brooklyn know you're doing pro bono defense work?
lol what is ball knowers though ? Seriously. I don’t remember anything about that.