Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
KnixinSix wrote:
RIP mags 
Jalen Bluntson wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
Does anyone have a calculator? If so, use it! 4/156=39mil. 4/212.5=42.5. WTF is this clown even talking about? Dude is as dumb as it gets. He's also a liar. No one is reporting any of this. They are giving opinions based on nothing. Knicks for clicks and this guy is one of the worst at it.
thebuzzardman wrote:
Already more offensively skilled than Mitch
Shame he's a P&R center when Knicks are hiring Jenkins whose offense isn't interested in P&Rs
Wait, that must mean Brown is the hire!
Terrible day for Shams and Melo!
Jalen Bluntson wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
Does anyone have a calculator? If so, use it! 4/156=39mil. 5/212.5=42.5. WTF is this clown even talking about? Dude is as dumb as it gets. He's also a liar. No one is reporting any of this. They are giving opinions based on nothing. Knicks for clicks and this guy is one of the worst at it.
KnixinSix wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
Does anyone have a calculator? If so, use it! 4/156=39mil. 4/212.5=42.5. WTF is this clown even talking about? Dude is as dumb as it gets. He's also a liar. No one is reporting any of this. They are giving opinions based on nothing. Knicks for clicks and this guy is one of the worst at it.
RIP mags
thebuzzardman wrote:ezmoney707 wrote:?s=46&t=bxju2fhKRgs9w-vljlsvkg
Do the Knicks still have his rights?
Does this mean coming over for summer league etc, seeing if he can make the Knicks?
Jalen Bluntson wrote:KnixinSix wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Does anyone have a calculator? If so, use it! 4/156=39mil. 4/212.5=42.5. WTF is this clown even talking about? Dude is as dumb as it gets. He's also a liar. No one is reporting any of this. They are giving opinions based on nothing. Knicks for clicks and this guy is one of the worst at it.
You keep pushing for reasons to trade Mikal. Using this clown is as bad as it gets bro.
rajajackal wrote:i just had a crystal vision of what robinson/durant/anunoby/bridges/brunson would actually look like and now i think i'm down to make the trade
ezmoney707 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:ezmoney707 wrote:?s=46&t=bxju2fhKRgs9w-vljlsvkg
Do the Knicks still have his rights?
Does this mean coming over for summer league etc, seeing if he can make the Knicks?
?s=46&t=bxju2fhKRgs9w-vljlsvkg
KnixinSix wrote:
Knicks know Mitch is not a reliable future asset. They still don't know exactly what Huk will be either. They also know if they want to build around KAT they MUST find an elite big to pair him with.
KnixinSix wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
You keep pushing for reasons to trade Mikal. Using this clown is as bad as it gets bro.
For perspective:
1. This is a trades and transactions thread. This is what its for.
2. In a trade you have to give to get. Mikal is the guy that seems to jump out the most for reasons discussed many times. One year left, broke the golden rule of speaking out in public against team which front office didn't like, etc.
3. This is not a performance related thing to me. I like Mikal and under the right circumstances would have no issue if we kept him. I absolutely think part of his underwhelming production wasn't due to diminished talent but misuse in the system.
4. This team IF they are going to build around 2 defensively deficient players , need to really focus on counterbalancing them as best as possible. I do feel there are Mikal scenarios for better fitting pieces thst make sense for overall roster construction. Anyone who would let Mikal stand in the way of a JJJ lets say or Giannis is just blind homerism. And not even saying those are 50% scenarios but that is part of the fun discussing things that at least have a chance of happening. Does it mean every single one of the trade scenarios we discuss have some 90% chance of happening? Of course not but lets not pretend they are all 0 sum either....(JUST like the OG Bridges and KAT trades that many kept flipping out about yet all 3 came to pass.)
RIP mags GONYK wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
Knicks know Mitch is not a reliable future asset. They still don't know exactly what Huk will be either. They also know if they want to build around KAT they MUST find an elite big to pair him with.
What does this have to do the Nnaji
RIP mags Jalen Bluntson wrote:GONYK wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
Knicks know Mitch is not a reliable future asset. They still don't know exactly what Huk will be either. They also know if they want to build around KAT they MUST find an elite big to pair him with.
What does this have to do the Nnaji
They're gonna package Mitch/Huk/Nnaji/Bridges for JJJ!
Jalen Bluntson wrote:GONYK wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
Knicks know Mitch is not a reliable future asset. They still don't know exactly what Huk will be either. They also know if they want to build around KAT they MUST find an elite big to pair him with.
What does this have to do the Nnaji
They're gonna package Mitch/Huk/Nnaji/Bridges for JJJ!
ezmoney707 wrote:?s=46&t=bxju2fhKRgs9w-vljlsvkg
KnixinSix wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:GONYK wrote:
What does this have to do the Nnaji
They're gonna package Mitch/Huk/Nnaji/Bridges for JJJ!
Oh boy ....who pissed in your flakes this morning capn crunch lololol
Nnaji is just a stab at trying to find a defensive 5 which is one of our biggest needs rn
Any other players you're interested in? RIP mags