[Camelo Thread Part 17] - Denver makes trade offer p58

knicks9784 · Post #861 » by **knicks9784** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:42 pm

King of Canada wrote:And what exactly could the cats offer anyway?

players with no position and bad contracts

Post #862 » by **Thugger HBC** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:44 pm

If the wiretap was the actual deal, I think that is actually fair.

Felton for Billups is an upgrade for us.

Melo is an upgrade over Chandler and Gallo.

They said three starters and named 2 out of three, Chandler has to be the third.

But Walsh is playing his hand, I'm not mad if this were true but chances are that would be the deal most likely.

BigUgly · Post #863 » by **BigUgly** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:44 pm

I am very torn on losing Felton but we better get this deal done

Post #864 » by **GONYK** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:47 pm

Knicksrule2k4 wrote:Idk I prob would of made that deal... Gallo, Felton and Curry for Melo and Billups.

That's not the proposed deal

VirginiaKnickFan · Post #865 » by **VirginiaKnickFan** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:49 pm

Bulls won't offer Noah so what could their offer be?

knicks9784 · Post #866 » by **knicks9784** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:50 pm

VirginiaKnickFan wrote:Bulls won't offer Noah so what could their offer be?

pure speculation on the writers part. i highly doubt they're even talking.

taj gibson is all they can offer and deng's massive contract

Post #867 » by **knicks742** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:51 pm

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baske ... tarte.html

Just say no Donnie. I would pull the trigger if they take out the request for another starter.

vallen · Post #868 » by **vallen** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:51 pm

VirginiaKnickFan wrote:Bulls won't offer Noah so what could their offer be?

how good they have done without him, i wouldn't be surprised if they didnt reconsider...

Subway Token · Post #869 » by **Subway Token** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:52 pm

knicks742 wrote:http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/2011/02/15/2011-02-15_carmelo_anthony_available_but_knicks_balk_at_request_for_gallinari_felton_starte.html

Just say no Donnie. I would pull the trigger if they take out the request for another starter.

Third starter = no picks. Simple.

Jordan45822 · Post #870 » by **Jordan45822** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:52 pm

VirginiaKnickFan wrote:Bulls won't offer Noah so what could their offer be?

Deng + Gibson + Johnson + Charlotte's Pick + Their own Pick. They probably add more to get JR Smith. Its pointless (I should know since I am a Bulls fan) because all they want is Noah and there nothing to see here if he is not involved. Not sure why Isola mentioned them (maybe because CA would sign an extension with them).

Post #871 » by **knicks742** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:53 pm

knicksfan5494 wrote:
knicks742 wrote:http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/2011/02/15/2011-02-15_carmelo_anthony_available_but_knicks_balk_at_request_for_gallinari_felton_starte.html

Just say no Donnie. I would pull the trigger if they take out the request for another starter.

Third starter = no picks. Simple.

Third starter is Mozzy, Amar'e or Fields. They can suck it. No deal.

Subway Token · Post #872 » by **Subway Token** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:53 pm

Jordan45822 wrote:
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:Bulls won't offer Noah so what could their offer be?

Deng + Gibson + Johnson + Charlotte's Pick + Their own Pick. They probably add more to get JR Smith. Its pointless (I should know since I am a Bulls fan) because all they want is Noah and there nothing to see here if he is not involved. Not sure why Isola mentioned them (maybe because CA would sign an extension with them).

Yeha not happening

VirginiaKnickFan · Post #873 » by **VirginiaKnickFan** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:55 pm

Jordan45822 wrote:
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:Bulls won't offer Noah so what could their offer be?

Deng + Gibson + Johnson + Charlotte's Pick + Their own Pick. They probably add more to get JR Smith. Its pointless (I should know since I am a Bulls fan) because all they want is Noah and there nothing to see here if he is not involved. Not sure why Isola mentioned them (maybe because CA would sign an extension with them).

That's what I was wondering since they don't seem like a good trading partner with what they have to offer outside of Noah.

Knicksrule2k4 · Post #874 » by **Knicksrule2k4** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:59 pm

Gallo, Felton, AR, Curry... Take it or leave it.

dancing dervish · Post #875 » by **dancing dervish** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:00 pm

Felton+Gallo+Curry+pick (through a AR trade most likely) would actually be a fair deal overall. Billups is a much better fit for SSOL due to his shooting and Melo is the second superstar. I'd personally also like to keep Chandler over Gallo because IMO Chandler is simply the better player.

Billups
Fields
Melo
Stoudemire
Mozgov

with Douglas,Chandler,Turiaf off the bench is not only a 55win team, it can also challenge Atlanta,Chicago and Orlando in the playoffs. All things considered that'd be a great accomplishment. Fields and Melo give us tremendous rebounding at the wings and Billups and Fields shoot the 3 ball well.

Post #876 » by **knicks742** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:00 pm

Why do they insist on trading Billups? Billups wants to stay in denver and is loved there and is not needed for a Knicks deal. I dont get it.

My guess is we offer up Chandler and remove Felton. Eddy, Chandler, Gallo and pick is what I expect the deal to be.

vallen · Post #877 » by **vallen** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:02 pm

That proposed deal doesnt even come close to working .......its off a lot..........

Subway Token · Post #878 » by **Subway Token** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:02 pm

knicks742 wrote:Why do they insist on trading Billups? Billups wants to stay in denver and is loved there and is not needed for a Knicks deal. I dont get it.

My guess is we offer up Chandler and remove Felton. Eddy, Chandler, Gallo and pick is what I expect the deal to be.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Demyze · Post #879 » by **Demyze** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:05 pm

What i take from this is Denver is a player now and those reports of them hanging on to Carmelo are false. Now we have 2 weeks to work with them and hopefully close a deal.

Post #880 » by **moocow007** » Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:06 pm

King of Canada wrote:And what exactly could the cats offer anyway?

A dozen vintage Air Jordans?