Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK, mpharris36
GONYK wrote:Here is the video
Clyde_Style wrote:So I understand we are not supposed to call people names or bait them. That's fine, but what is this trash they are posting claiming everything from Cohen is fiction?
Now they're posting more lies and gloating because they think they are protected.
Besides not calling people names and baiting, are we going to have any standards about people who consistently post lies and rancid source materials?
Michael Cohen's testimony to Congress launched the investigation into Trump's banking fraud which has resulted in the court's ruling Trump's accounting firm Mazars must turn over his taxes.
Here it is.
That's the U.S. Congress, not clown world
That testimony set the wheels in motion. And it is proceeding to indictment. And that wouldn't have happened if Cohen failed to provide investigators with materials.
Tish James just subpoenaed Eric Trump
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/03/judge-orders-trump-company-to-court-for-new-york-subpoenas.html
https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2020/attorney-general-james-takes-action-force-trump-organization-comply-ongoing
FACTS
Not toxic disinfo sites like Breitbart and Zero Hedge which this person traffics in
I'm not bullying. I'm asking for accountability
Dave DaButcher wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:So I understand we are not supposed to call people names or bait them. That's fine, but what is this trash they are posting claiming everything from Cohen is fiction?
Now they're posting more lies and gloating because they think they are protected.
Besides not calling people names and baiting, are we going to have any standards about people who consistently post lies and rancid source materials?
Michael Cohen's testimony to Congress launched the investigation into Trump's banking fraud which has resulted in the court's ruling Trump's accounting firm Mazars must turn over his taxes.
Here it is.
That's the U.S. Congress, not clown world
That testimony set the wheels in motion. And it is proceeding to indictment. And that wouldn't have happened if Cohen failed to provide investigators with materials.
Tish James just subpoenaed Eric Trump
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/03/judge-orders-trump-company-to-court-for-new-york-subpoenas.html
https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2020/attorney-general-james-takes-action-force-trump-organization-comply-ongoing
FACTS
Not toxic disinfo sites like Breitbart and Zero Hedge which this person traffics in
I'm not bullying. I'm asking for accountability
Agreed. These new rules, though seemingly well-intentioned, only serve to amplify disinformation and render further participation here pointless.
So sayonara all. Don’t forget to vote, and let’s go Knicks!!
A recount could be looming in the 4th Congressional District race between two Democrats as more uncounted ballots surfaced on Thursday.
Officials in Newton, Wellesley and Franklin on Thursday restarted counting primary ballots after Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin filed a court order to authorize local poll workers to continue counting ballots that were received on time and had not been tallied by the end of Tuesday night.
In Franklin, poll workers Thursday evening were counting about 3,000 uncounted ballots — much more than the previously estimated 600 uncounted ballots, according to a spokeswoman for the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s Office
BallSacBounce wrote:This here is how Massachusetts handles their mail in voting. It wasn't fraud like in NJ it was just a cluster****
Massachusetts: Thousands of Mail-in Ballots Found Days After the Election
But sure, let's do this for a national election.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/09/massachusetts-thousands-of-mail-in-ballots-found-days-after-the-election/A recount could be looming in the 4th Congressional District race between two Democrats as more uncounted ballots surfaced on Thursday.
Officials in Newton, Wellesley and Franklin on Thursday restarted counting primary ballots after Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin filed a court order to authorize local poll workers to continue counting ballots that were received on time and had not been tallied by the end of Tuesday night.
In Franklin, poll workers Thursday evening were counting about 3,000 uncounted ballots — much more than the previously estimated 600 uncounted ballots, according to a spokeswoman for the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s Office
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:BallSacBounce wrote:This here is how Massachusetts handles their mail in voting. It wasn't fraud like in NJ it was just a cluster****
Massachusetts: Thousands of Mail-in Ballots Found Days After the Election
But sure, let's do this for a national election.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/09/massachusetts-thousands-of-mail-in-ballots-found-days-after-the-election/A recount could be looming in the 4th Congressional District race between two Democrats as more uncounted ballots surfaced on Thursday.
Officials in Newton, Wellesley and Franklin on Thursday restarted counting primary ballots after Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin filed a court order to authorize local poll workers to continue counting ballots that were received on time and had not been tallied by the end of Tuesday night.
In Franklin, poll workers Thursday evening were counting about 3,000 uncounted ballots — much more than the previously estimated 600 uncounted ballots, according to a spokeswoman for the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s Office
These trash ass websites you're posting, just gonna put you on ignore and save time. Might as well go on twitter and follow some bots.
BallSacBounce wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:BallSacBounce wrote:This here is how Massachusetts handles their mail in voting. It wasn't fraud like in NJ it was just a cluster****
Massachusetts: Thousands of Mail-in Ballots Found Days After the Election
But sure, let's do this for a national election.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/09/massachusetts-thousands-of-mail-in-ballots-found-days-after-the-election/
These trash ass websites you're posting, just gonna put you on ignore and save time. Might as well go on twitter and follow some bots.
That website is quoting the Boston Herald, but sure, it's trash. I mean, in your mind it is because you've never heard of it. But that's not a credibility issue with the website it's a lack of intellectual rigor on your part.
I'd respect it if you had picked apart the site itself with some examples of their lack of credibility. I'd be forced to respect what you said. But you didn't do that and we both know why. You got nuthin. It's a great website, you just don't know about it but that doesn't mean anything at all.
HarthorneWingo wrote:BallSacBounce wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
These trash ass websites you're posting, just gonna put you on ignore and save time. Might as well go on twitter and follow some bots.
That website is quoting the Boston Herald, but sure, it's trash. I mean, in your mind it is because you've never heard of it. But that's not a credibility issue with the website it's a lack of intellectual rigor on your part.
I'd respect it if you had picked apart the site itself with some examples of their lack of credibility. I'd be forced to respect what you said. But you didn't do that and we both know why. You got nuthin. It's a great website, you just don't know about it but that doesn't mean anything at all.
There’s been some problems in other states worse than Massachusetts, which according to this NY Times article, didn’t do a bad job. Will it take longer to count all of the ballots this year, sure. But there’s no reason why this can’t be done without “fraud.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/02/us/politics/massachusetts-election-voting.html
BallSacBounce wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:BallSacBounce wrote:That website is quoting the Boston Herald, but sure, it's trash. I mean, in your mind it is because you've never heard of it. But that's not a credibility issue with the website it's a lack of intellectual rigor on your part.
I'd respect it if you had picked apart the site itself with some examples of their lack of credibility. I'd be forced to respect what you said. But you didn't do that and we both know why. You got nuthin. It's a great website, you just don't know about it but that doesn't mean anything at all.
There’s been some problems in other states worse than Massachusetts, which according to this NY Times article, didn’t do a bad job. Will it take longer to count all of the ballots this year, sure. But there’s no reason why this can’t be done without “fraud.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/02/us/politics/massachusetts-election-voting.html
That's true. I'm more concerned with the delay factor from a huge increase in declaring a winner and the breakdown in trust should there be a massive reversal. Which is entirely possible I've read that Democrats are twice as likely as Republicans to vote by mail.
Of course in the most important way, so what. That's the way the system is being set up, this time. But maybe we need to figure out a better way. Some states allow ballots to be postmarked the day of the general election.
Capn'O wrote:They're not new rules and you can say that the information in the post is BS.
That post is full of lies - OK
You have made many posts full of lies - OK
You sit on a throne of lies - Borderline but I wouldn't strike it due to the fantastic reference.
You are a liar - Personal Attack
It's not that hard.
Clyde_Style wrote:
Wow!
Thank you Anita, that's real courage on display. She's amazing to do this. Big respect.
This clearly couldn't have happened if Joe had not reached out to her to make amends.
HarthorneWingo wrote:BallSacBounce wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
There’s been some problems in other states worse than Massachusetts, which according to this NY Times article, didn’t do a bad job. Will it take longer to count all of the ballots this year, sure. But there’s no reason why this can’t be done without “fraud.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/02/us/politics/massachusetts-election-voting.html
That's true. I'm more concerned with the delay factor from a huge increase in declaring a winner and the breakdown in trust should there be a massive reversal. Which is entirely possible I've read that Democrats are twice as likely as Republicans to vote by mail.
Of course in the most important way, so what. That's the way the system is being set up, this time. But maybe we need to figure out a better way. Some states allow ballots to be postmarked the day of the general election.
It’s not a “reversal.” The election will probably not be decided on Election night. We’ll all just have to be patient and wait it out. You have to know that on Election night that Trump is going to declare victory and the initiate all of this litigation to prevent the rest of the votes from being counted.
That’s going to be out big problem.