Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
ClydeRules wrote:BKlutch wrote:Trump said Clinton was "pumped up" during the debate, but seemed to loose steam and at the end, had to be helped by her car. He seems to be confusing two events: the debate, and the 9/11 ceremony, but yet Hillary is the one on drugs. Jeez.
No she was helped into her car after the 2nd debate.
_______ M U K C A_________ ** GO NY GO NY GO NY GO! ** BKlutch wrote:Trump said Clinton was "pumped up" during the debate, but seemed to loose steam and at the end, had to be helped by her car. He seems to be confusing two events: the debate, and the 9/11 ceremony, but yet Hillary is the one on drugs. Jeez.
HarthorneWingo wrote:BKlutch wrote:Trump said Clinton was "pumped up" during the debate, but seemed to loose steam and at the end, had to be helped by her car. He seems to be confusing two events: the debate, and the 9/11 ceremony, but yet Hillary is the one on drugs. Jeez.
First, Trump said HRC didn't have the stamina for the job and pointed to her health. Then when he was asked at the Town Hall what positive qualities Clinton possessed, Trump said she "never stops fighting; keeps getting back up" etc. praising her toughness. Now he thinks she gets her stamina from drugs?
Which is it, for crying out loud?
_______ M U K C A_________ ** GO NY GO NY GO NY GO! ** BKlutch wrote:ClydeRules wrote:BKlutch wrote:Trump said Clinton was "pumped up" during the debate, but seemed to loose steam and at the end, had to be helped by her car. He seems to be confusing two events: the debate, and the 9/11 ceremony, but yet Hillary is the one on drugs. Jeez.
No she was helped into her car after the 2nd debate.
Would you please show me a credible reference for that?
ClydeRules wrote:BKlutch wrote:ClydeRules wrote:
No she was helped into her car after the 2nd debate.
Would you please show me a credible reference for that?
I saw it on TV after the second debate. And it wasn't the 9/11 incident.
_______ M U K C A_________ ** GO NY GO NY GO NY GO! ** Knicks_Fan2 wrote:Trump fomenting an armed insurrection after he gets wiped out in the election. Ridiculous and dangerous. He is awful.
jmort wrote:It's always good to stop and check your premises though. If you start to find yourself repeating garbage about Wikileaks being in league with the Russians (even, or especially, if it's true), then chill for a second. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. There Is Nothing To Fear. READ the Goldman-Sachs speeches, for example. It's just information. No one's Hidden Agendas matter a lick.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11011
Maybe you'll feel some discomfort at the contrast between (relatively!) straightforward discussion of the nitty-gritty workings of governments and the hollow bloviation we're treated to on TV. But if the world made sense, this leak would murder Trump. From start to finish it all straight-up reeks of nothing but Complete and Utter Competence.
It's like... Magnus Carlsson is playing a simultaneous chess exhibition against a roomful of Indian teenagers and Donald Trump gets up telling him to step aside and let me Make America Great Again. Or Mandingo is taking care of the monthly meeting of the Roanoke Sewing and Crafts Club and Donald Trump comes in telling him to sit his ass down and let me Make America Great Again...
What a joke. And here I was about to vote for Jill Stein.
The head of the House Oversight Committee said Friday that there may be allegations of "quid pro quo" between a top Hillary Clinton aide and an FBI official detailed in newly released documents from the bureau's investigation of Clinton's private email server.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) has not reviewed the documents released Friday, he told Fox News, but based on briefings he said "there was an alleged quid pro quo” between the State Department's Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy and an FBI official over a classified email.
“In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.
"This is a flashing red light of potential criminality," said Chaffetz.
He said he was "infuriated" by the news and said there are grounds for at least four congressional hearings on the issue.
GONYK wrote:I don't think it is fully being understood how little the American electorate cares about Hillary's Wikileaks.
ClydeRules wrote:Knicks_Fan2 wrote:Trump fomenting an armed insurrection after he gets wiped out in the election. Ridiculous and dangerous. He is awful.
What is shameful is the press trying to force a President on the country instead of impartially reporting news in a balanced way. That is what goes on in Iran, Cuba and Russia.
earthmansurfer wrote:It is going to be difficult to prosecute Hillary as the corruption is deep, this just out:
Chaffetz: New Clinton files contain allegations of 'quid pro quo' with FBI
snippet (and note, of course the FBI rejects this.The head of the House Oversight Committee said Friday that there may be allegations of "quid pro quo" between a top Hillary Clinton aide and an FBI official detailed in newly released documents from the bureau's investigation of Clinton's private email server.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) has not reviewed the documents released Friday, he told Fox News, but based on briefings he said "there was an alleged quid pro quo” between the State Department's Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy and an FBI official over a classified email.
“In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.
"This is a flashing red light of potential criminality," said Chaffetz.
He said he was "infuriated" by the news and said there are grounds for at least four congressional hearings on the issue.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/301215-chaffetz-new-clinton-files-contain-allegations-of-quid-pro-quo#.WALx4kKBL2M.twitter
earthmansurfer wrote:How much more time does "mainstream" really have? tic toc tic toc
You can vote here:
duetta wrote:ClydeRules wrote:Knicks_Fan2 wrote:Trump fomenting an armed insurrection after he gets wiped out in the election. Ridiculous and dangerous. He is awful.
What is shameful is the press trying to force a President on the country instead of impartially reporting news in a balanced way. That is what goes on in Iran, Cuba and Russia.
What is shameful is that a bunch of know-nothings and racists want a career incompetent, with the attention span of a flea, and deep business ties to dirtier-than-mud Russian oligarchs as our President.
The moron last night went on a Twitter binge and called for the cancellation of Saturday Night Live - a show that he appeared only a few months ago.
Caligula for President.
Capn'O wrote:GONYK wrote:I don't think it is fully being understood how little the American electorate cares about Hillary's Wikileaks.
Taibbi's point was probably the most poignant about the issue: that we kinda wish these politicians would speak to us plebs with such frankness and insight.
