Rose found not liable: Update pg. 62

Jalen Bluntson · Post #941 » by **Jalen Bluntson** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:14 pm

CJackson wrote:So what's up wid dis trial?

Brandon Jennings wasn't there too, was he?

Knicks_Fan2 · Post #942 » by **Knicks_Fan2** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:18 pm

CJackson wrote:So what's up wid dis trial?

Day off from trial. Continues tomorrow and likely concludes Wednesday.

RHODEY · Post #943 » by **RHODEY** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:34 pm

Swoosh_Stripes wrote:
NYKAL wrote:
K P 6 wrote:Jenning running that second unit is nothing to toy around with. Especially since lineups will be staggered. Jennings will be getting KP looks. And I dont see why Courtney wont be playing 30mpg at SG. Either way im anxious to see the rotation.

I have a different outlook. I'd rather have Jennings getting easy shots for Melo and Proz as opposed to taking shot away from them. With Rose in the starting Lineup, he's looking to Score 1st while we already have very good scorers on the floor.

Jennings is not exactly J. Kidd out there either, he's also a score 1st PG.

IMO he is in the John Wall Mode (ofcourse not as good!) Scoring point who also has a passing mentality. You can see Jennings takes as much pride in a dazzling assist as he does with drive to the hoop. We may have lucked out and caught him at just the right time. A time were he has matured enough to impact the game in several ways. Keep in mind that he has never been on a team with this kind of offensive talent. Had he not been injured he was already on his way to playing like this...

F N 11 · Post #944 » by **F N 11** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:39 pm

Jennings is not a high % scorer. I like him a lot. But D Rose vs Jennings is a no brainer.

F N 11 · Post #945 » by **F N 11** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:39 pm

Knicks_Fan2 wrote:
CJackson wrote:So what's up wid dis trial?

Day off from trial. Continues tomorrow and likely concludes Wednesday.

Tuesday from what I have been reading.

Post #946 » by **King of Canada** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:40 pm

Read on Twitter

Post #947 » by **King of Canada** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:41 pm

K P 6 wrote:
Knicks_Fan2 wrote:
CJackson wrote:So what's up wid dis trial?

Day off from trial. Continues tomorrow and likely concludes Wednesday.

Tuesday from what I have been reading.

Was supposed to be Tuesday, but the judge had to take the day off, so was pushed back to Wed.

F N 11 · Post #948 » by **F N 11** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:46 pm

King of Canada wrote:
K P 6 wrote:
Knicks_Fan2 wrote:
Day off from trial. Continues tomorrow and likely concludes Wednesday.

Tuesday from what I have been reading.

Was supposed to be Tuesday, but the judge had to take the day off, so was pushed back to Wed.

dont seem like he'll play Wednesday then.

dablackprodigy · Post #949 » by **dablackprodigy** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:56 pm

Just be ready for the season

Knickerbock · Post #950 » by **Knickerbock** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:02 pm

Derrick Rose just resting those legs... He going to go **** on them cavs..

trophywinner · Post #951 » by **trophywinner** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:20 pm

Read on Twitter

JXL · Post #952 » by **JXL** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:24 pm

trophywinner wrote:

Read on Twitter

It's become a joke now. She's clearly not getting a cent.

Knicks_Fan2 · Post #953 » by **Knicks_Fan2** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:26 pm

JXL wrote:
trophywinner wrote:

Read on Twitter

It's become a joke now. She's clearly not getting a cent.

It's never over in a jury trial, especially without an elevated burden of proof.

JXL · Post #954 » by **JXL** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:28 pm

Knicks_Fan2 wrote:
JXL wrote:
trophywinner wrote:

Read on Twitter

It's become a joke now. She's clearly not getting a cent.

It's never over in a jury trial, especially without an elevated burden of proof.

Was the various text messages not proof enough for you?

Knicks_Fan2 · Post #955 » by **Knicks_Fan2** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:32 pm

JXL wrote:
Was the various text messages not proof enough for you?

It doesn't matter what I think. I'm sure juries have decided on behalf of a plaintiff with less evidence. I agree with you that he has a decided advantage but you never know when the standard is preponderance of the evidence.

CJackson · Post #956 » by **CJackson** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:43 pm

Knicks_Fan2 wrote:
JXL wrote:
Was the various text messages not proof enough for you?

It doesn't matter what I think. I'm sure juries have decided on behalf of a plaintiff with less evidence. I agree with you that he has a decided advantage but you never know when the standard is preponderance of the evidence.

Well, the defense still hasn't called Derek Fisher or Kevin Garnett to the stand, so anything can still happen.

trophywinner · Post #957 » by **trophywinner** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:51 pm

nov 4th

nykfan42 · Post #958 » by **nykfan42** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:17 pm

trophywinner wrote:nov 4th

I hope this is sarcasm in some way. MCW is a scrub. D Rose is better without his knees.

Post #959 » by **moocow007** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:29 pm

trophywinner wrote:

Read on Twitter

Wow...

In the deposition Keyana LaVergne, a former colleague of the accuser at the property management firm GHP, says she came into work just hours after the alleged rape and “didn’t seem battered. She didn’t seem off.”

“She was at work behaving normally,” LaVergne testified.

In fact she even showed LaVergne photos of herself in a sex harness she’d bought for Rose and laughed about it, according to court papers.

“She was giggling a little bit as she watched me Google it,” LaVergne recalls in a sworn statement. “I could not figure out exactly what a sex belt was, so she explained to me that a sex belt with two bars for the man to hold enables the man to get leverage and hold the bars during the ‘doggie style’ position.”

LaVergne also claims: “Not one time did ‘rape’ come out of her mouth.”

The depositions buttress the remark by Rose’s lawyer in opening statements that the Los Angeles civil suit is a “sad effort to get a lottery hit.”

The accuser was “broke at the time” of the 2015 civil suit and “needed money,” LaVergne said.

At one point the accuser even texted LaVergne admitting, “I need a very wealthy good man.”

The accuser’s lawyers insist the testimony is “irrelevant” and based on hearsay or opinion.

Honestly based on everything this is basically where I'm at with this

Watch on YouTube

What's also shady is the talk that she was hoping Rose settles out of court. If this was really about rape and not the money then you'd think she'd stand her ground so that a court of law (even a civil one) would be able to find that she was telling the truth. Apparently truth not as important as a few million.

I mean think about it.

CJackson · Post #960 » by **CJackson** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:35 pm

Just a few more days now and Jane Doe can return to her life of sex, lies and no videotape.