Fat Kat wrote:booyaka_jones wrote:The Lamma wrote:It's pretty imperative we re-sign D Rose. His arrival sparked the team and transformed us from a middling team into a winner. At seasons end we were 24-11 when he played, 17-20 without, and probably 90% of us watch every game, so you know that was no fluke. He straight up carried the team for stretches of multiple games.
The good news is he and Thibs have an obvious rapport and chemistry, so you would assume he stays based on him merely preferring to play for Los Knicks. But yeah, this is kind of an underrated, under-talked about need-to-do offseason transaction.
Am I the only one that doesn't want to give Thibs his favorite toys back? He really is like my toddler at times - I buy this kid better shinier toys but he just wants to play with the damn amazon boxes all day instead.
Not only was Rose one of the better players on our team, he had a tremendous rapport with the rookies. Not sure what’s not to like
Not that I disagree, entirely of course - I didn't mean to give the impression that I don't have much love for D-Rose. I really just can't trust our couch to NOT run it back on big minutes all over again with guys like Rose, Bullock and Taj if we bring them back. As much as each of those aging vets contributed last season, we need to look forward, not backward. I don't see how if we somehow bring Bullock back (we shouldn't, ate his current asking price), Thibs won't just slot him right into the starting unit again. Taj is just another roadblock to small ball experimentations with Obi and Randle. My issue isn't with the vets themselves - I appreciate every one of their contributions. My issue lies in Thibs and his usage of these guys and what happens if we basically just run it back next season.
























