Ghetto Gospel wrote:Gravy wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
that absolutely is your right not to watch. I was uninterested in watching much of the 4th qtr.
I mean its football so I will still watch....but I clearly will not be invested in this group or care enough. Just don't f*ck up our draft positioning late in the year like we always do so that when it comes draft day teams are asking to deplete all our draft capital to move up.
I just don't see how you can let Schoen/Daboll get another draft especially one where a QB is likely the pick. What if they have another bad season next year...you fire them after tying them to a future QB...then saddle the new GM and Coach with a QB they didn't choose?
The good organizations are in sync. Basically if you let Schoen/Daboll pick there next QB you have to give them 2-3 more years to see it play out...anyone willing to give them that much more rope?
Right now I would give them the opportunity to get their own QB, they have only been here two years with somebody else's QB and some backups. If the team completely falls apart during this season with no growth from their picks maybe I'll change my mind.
by giving daniel jones that deal, they did pick their qb.. don't give him that deal if you don't want him
that I don't 100% necessarily agree with. There are other factors in play. They clearly were going to move on...they didn't pick up his 5th year option. Then they have that surprise year of making the playoffs which probably set the entire organization back by making the playoffs and Daniel Jones having his best career game by winning a road playoff game.
To say you can simply just walk away form that decision easily is not realistic IMO. It is Madden or a video game...you have an owner and fan base to appease and with all the losing they were doing to simply just walk away from your QB with pretty much no realistic replacement isn't a realistic option...clearly now it looks different...at the time however not really.
They also offered a long term deal to Barkley during that good year and he turned it down...which means they could have in theory Franchised Daniel Jones...but by doing that they would have also lost Barkley to a long term deal because he would have held all the cards and already turned down multiple long term offers.
So again the decision wasn't clear cut back then so I wont kill them for that decision.
Its all the other decisions that are piling up for me....Have two top 10 picks and whiff on Neal and KT looks like just a JAG...Banks looks ok but nothing special....and we are just wasting 2-4th round picks where your roster is made in the NFL. You need starters out of those spots and we aren't getting any if all production from those picks.