ImageImageImageImageImage

OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#961 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Sep 7, 2018 12:20 am

thebuzzardman wrote:As an aside, one of the links off the Utah corruption thing

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-james-woolsey-mueller-mar-a-lago-2017-11

A quick read of this makes Woolsey seem guilty as well. Or is it that this falls under a kind of "legal corruption" and Flynn goes over the line and then Trump kind of jumps over it talking to him?

Certainly doesn't give me a warm and fuzzy about Woolsey as part of any "responsible opposition"


Woolsey is guilty of the same sin as every Trump associate: He should have already known what he was getting into. It is one thing to dismiss a portion of the population that voted for Trump as being clueless about his criminal past and nature, but Woolsey being an IC guy knew better so I don't think that much of him for climbing into bed with the Trump team.

He did bail on them quickly though most definitely at least because of Flynn saying hey let's kidnap people!

He quit and reported it to the FBI. Then Flynn flipped.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#962 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Sep 7, 2018 12:22 am

JohnStarksTheDunk wrote:
j4remi wrote:I hope when the dust settles that these "resistance" insiders don't get treated like some sort of heroes for doing the bare minimum while acknowledging all of the damage Trump is doing and trying to do. It all smacks of damage control for when they can get him out of office and claim that "this is not the Republican party, it was Trump." They should be blackballed, straight up and down. They saw the damage firsthand and let the man keep his power while claiming to be resistance. FOH


Agreed. As you and others have pointed out, this is most likely an attempt to distance the Republican Party from this mess and perhaps even rescue the writer’s own reputation, if he or she has future political aspirations.

In actuality the writer and others in this so-called “resistance” are enablers, willing to put up with Trump’s madness because they are getting everything else they wanted. The mention of his positive “accomplishments” such as tax cuts and general praise for conservative values is the real tip-off. These people wouldn’t have been able to get these things done (including another right wing extremist on the SCOTUS!) if they hadn’t rode Trump’s coat-tails to victory. Either they knew he was incompetent and dangerous from the beginning, or found out literally the first day on the job. But they didn’t employ the 25th Amendment because, quite frankly, Trump is/was too popular among a particular sect of voters. These folks are no more heroic than McConnel, Ryan, and everyone else in Congress who have done nothing about the situation. The writer hints that Trump should be stopped, but ultimately doesn’t want to be the one to stop him.

The only good sign here is that it shows that even within the Administration, folks see the writing on the wall. He’s done.


Agreed. There are no heroes in the WH. Though I'll still take it if it means someone might be there to prevent Trump from hitting buttons.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#963 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Sep 7, 2018 12:32 am

ChilledAlex wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:Just read this. I thought it was a satire piece at times. This is Trump talking to Bob Woodward. THE Bob Woodward, who Trump knows is doing a book on his presidency:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/04/transcript-phone-call-between-president-trump-journalist-bob-woodward/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.abbe0decf022

Bob Woodward, an associate editor at The Washington Post, sought an interview with President Trump as he was writing “Fear,” a book about Trump’s presidency. Trump called Woodward in early August, after the manuscript had been completed, to say he wanted to participate.

Over the course of 11-plus minutes, Trump repeatedly claimed his White House staff hadn’t informed him of Woodward’s interview request — despite also admitting Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) had told him Woodward wanted to talk. He also started the phone call by saying Woodward had “always been fair” to him, but by the end he said the book would be “inaccurate.”

Spoiler:
Trump: Hello, Bob.

BW: President Trump, how are you?

Trump: How are you? How are you doing? Okay?

BW: Real well. I’m turning on my tape recorder, with your permission.

Trump: Oh, that’s okay. That’s okay. I don’t mind that at all.

BW: I’m sorry we missed the opportunity to talk for the book.

Trump: Well, I just spoke with Kellyanne [Conway] and she asked me if I got a call. I never got a call. I never got a message. Who did you ask about speaking to me?

BW: Well, about six people.

Trump: They don’t tell me.

BW: A senator. I talked to Kellyanne about it two and a half months ago.

Trump: [?].

BW: She came for lunch.

Trump: Well, it’s too bad. Of course, you and I had a conversation a couple of years ago, and so that I think got you there a little bit. And we had a conversation many years ago, if you remember, in Trump Tower.

BW: Yeah, I do.

Trump: That has to be 20 years ago. And you were thinking about doing a book about me then, which is interesting. Who knew it would’ve been on this subject? Right? That was not in the cards at that time.

BW: That’s right. Well, I’m sorry, I . ..

Trump: I still remember that.

BW: I spent a lot of time on this, talked to lots of people.

Trump: All right. Good.

BW: And as you know and are living, we are at a pivot point in history.

Trump: Right.

BW: And I would’ve liked to have done that, and I maximized my effort, and somehow it didn’t get to you, or . ..

Trump: It’s really too bad, because nobody told me about it, and I would’ve loved to have spoken to you. You know I’m very open to you. I think you’ve always been fair. We’ll see what happens. But all I can say is the country is doing very well. We’re doing better economically just about than at any time. We’re doing better on unemployment maybe than ever. You know, I mean, if you look at the unemployment numbers, you’ve heard me say it. And we’re doing better on unemployment than just about ever. We’re having a lot of — a lot of companies are moving back into our country, which would’ve been unheard of two years ago. If the other administration or representatives of it had kept going, had kept — you know, if the other group had won, I will tell you, that you would have, I think you’d have a GDP of less than zero. I think we would’ve been going in the wrong direction. Because regulations are such a big part of what we’ve done, Bob.

BW: Well, I understand that point of view. And as you know, it’s also a difficult time where the political system and you and my business is being tested.

Trump: Yeah. Yeah.


BW: I take it very seriously. I’ve done books on eight presidents, going back from Nixon to Obama.

Trump: Right.

BW: And I learned something about reporting, frankly, Mr. President.

Trump: Good.

BW: I’ve got to go talk to people and see them outside of the White House and outside of their offices, and gained a lot of insight and documentation. And it’s — you know, it’s a tough look at the world and your administration and you.

Trump: Right. Well, I assume that means it’s going to be a negative book. But you know, I’m some — I’m sort of 50 percent used to that. [Laughter] That’s all right. Some are good and some are bad. Sounds like this is going to be a bad one.

BW: It was a chance missed, and I don’t know how things work over there in terms of . ..

Trump: Very well. We . ..

BW: . . . getting to you.

Trump: Well, if you would call Madeleine [Westerhout] in my office . . . Did you speak to Madeleine?

BW: No, I didn’t. But I . ..

Trump: Madeleine is the key. She’s the secret. Because she’s the person . ..

BW: Well, I talked to Raj [Shah] about it. I talked to . . . I talked to Kellyanne.

Trump: Well, a lot of them are afraid to come and talk, or — you know, they are busy. I’m busy. But I don’t mind talking to you. I would’ve spoken to you. I spoke to you 20 years [ago] and I spoke to you a year and a half or two years ago.

[Listen to Woodward and Trump's call on The Post's "Can He Do That?" podcast]

BW: A couple of years ago, I understand.

Trump: And I certainly don’t mind talking to you, and I wish I could’ve spoken to you. But nobody called my office. I mean, you went through, I guess, different people. ...


BW: Well, Mr. President, how can I spend all this time talking to people and — like Kellyanne and Raj and Republican senators?

Trump: Who were the senators? No, they never called me about it.

BW: Senator [Lindsey] Graham said he had talked to you about talking to me. Now, is that not true?

Trump: Senator Graham actually mentioned it quickly in one meeting.

BW: Yes. Well, see. And then nothing happened.

Trump: That is true. That is true. Well, that — no, but that is true. Mentioned it quickly, not like, you know, and I would certainly have thought that maybe you would’ve called the office. But that’s okay. I’ll speak to Kellyanne. I am a little surprised that she wouldn’t have told me. In fact, she just walked in. [to Kellyanne] I’m talking to Bob Woodward. He said that he told you.

Conway: Yes.

Trump: About speaking to me. But you never told me. Why didn’t you tell me?

Conway: [inaudible].

Trump: I would’ve been very happy to speak to him. All right, so what are you going to do?

BW: Well ...

Trump: So I have another bad book coming out. Big deal.

BW: . . . it goes on, and I . . . What you can count on is that I’ve been very careful. And Evelyn, are you on?

EMD: Yes.

BW: Evelyn Duffy, who’s my assistant, Mr. President.

Trump: Hello, Evelyn.

BW: She transcribed all the tapes because, with permission, I taped people for hundreds of hours.

Trump: Good.

BW: And I think there’s nothing in this book that doesn’t come from a firsthand source. Is that correct, Evelyn?

EMD: I believe that’s —

Trump: But are you naming names? Or do you just say sources?

BW: Yeah, well, it names real incidents, so . ..

Trump: No, but do you name sources? I mean, are you naming the people, or just say, people have said?

BW: I say, at 2:00 on this day, the following happened, and everyone who’s there, including yourself, is quoted. And I’m sorry I didn’t get to ask you about these . ..

Trump: I mean, you do know I’m doing a great job for the country. You do know that NATO now is going to pay billions and billions of dollars more, as an example, than anybody thought possible, that other presidents were unable to get more? And it was heading downward. You do know all of the things I’ve done and things that I’m doing? I’m in the process of making some of the greatest trade deals ever to be made. You do understand that stuff? I mean, I hope.



BW: Certainly, I understand and I would’ve loved to go through a discussion with you about NATO, because this goes back to early in your administration and your concern about it, and the agreement that the countries have that they would increase their defense contribution, what is it, by the year 2024? And you know . . . So anyway, we are . ..

Trump: Well, you know last year, if you see the secretary, [Jens] Stoltenberg, he said I believe $44 billion just last year, and that was from last year’s meeting. And this year it’s much more money they’ve agreed to put up. So it’s a tremendous amount of money. No other president has done it. It was heading down in the opposite direction. So I don’t know if you’re going to report it that way; probably not. But that’s too bad, but that’s all right, but you know, one of those things.

BW: Everything is going to be factual. And it is not a good thing for my business, if I may say this to you, Mr. President, to the presidency, or to the country, to not have real, full exchanges on these. And I broke my spear on it trying to get to you.

Trump: Well, other than Lindsey [Graham], who did quickly mention it, nobody mentioned it.

BW: You say Kellyanne’s there, ask her.

Trump: Nobody told me about it. Well, let me ask her. Why don’t you speak to Kellyanne. Ask her. She never told me about it.

[Conway takes the phone.]

BW: Kellyanne?

Conway: Bob, how are you? Hi.

BW: Hi. Remember two and a half months ago you came over and I laid out, I wanted to talk to the president? And you said you would get back to me?

Conway: I do. And I put in the request. But you know, they — it was rejected. I can only take it so far. I guess I can bring it right to the president next time.

BW: Yeah.

Conway: But I try to follow all the protocols, or else I’m accused of being somebody who doesn’t follow protocol.

BW: President Trump, I just want you to know I made every effort.

Conway: But you had talked to [former White House communications director] Hope [Hicks], right, who said no?

BW: Listen, I talked to anyone I could. [Laughs]

Conway: You talked to a number of people and they all said no?

BW: I talked to Raj.

Conway: Raj.

BW: He was going to work it out.

Conway: Hope. [Me?].

[The president says something in the background that is inaudible.]


Conway: I said you tried talking to everybody? What about when you interviewed, like, other people? They all said yes? That they’d try?

BW: Yeah, well, about six or seven people. I tried. And I couldn’t have — you and I spent a whole lunch on it, Kellyanne. And I said, I want to cover the substantive issues in foreign policy and domestic policy. And you said you would get back to me. Nothing.

Conway: Yeah. So, I did. I presented it to the people here who make those decisions, but . ..

BW: Who are the people?

Conway: But anyway, I’ll give you back to the president. And I’m glad to hear that you tried through seven or eight different people. That’s good. You should tell him all the names. [Laughs] Thank you.

Trump: But you never called for me. It would’ve been nice, Bob, if you called for me, in my office. I mean, I have a secretary. I have two, three secretaries. If you would’ve called directly — a lot of people are afraid . . . Raj, I hardly have . . . I don’t speak to Raj.

BW: Kellyanne is a . ..

Trump: I do, I do, and Kellyanne went to somebody, but she didn’t come to me.

BW: Well, does she have access to you?

Trump: And she should’ve come to me. She does have access to me. Absolutely. She has direct access, but she didn’t come to me. And you know what? That’s okay. I’ll just end up with another bad book. What can I tell you?

BW: It’s surprising to me that these people — did Raj have access to you?

Trump: Not really, but he would’ve been able to do it. But I have an office. You have the office number. I have an office that’s directly into my office.

Conway: [inaudible in background]

Trump: It doesn’t matter. Let me tell you what matters: The economy is the best it’s been in many, many decades. And it’s going to get a lot better. And the country is doing very well. That’s what’s important.

BW: Yes, sir. I thought I would . ..

Trump: We’re doing a good job.

BW: . . . never kind of say, let’s not talk about this because the book is done to a president . ..

Trump: Yeah, I know.

BW: . . . and, but that’s the position we’re in. And it’s one I tried to avoid. You need to know I made maximum effort.

Trump: All right. It’s too bad.

BW: Yes, sir.

Trump: I’m just hearing about it. And I heard — I did hear from Lindsey, but I’m just hearing about it. So we’re going to have a very inaccurate book, and that’s too bad. But I don’t blame you entirely.

BW: No, it’s [?] — it’s going to be accurate, I promise.

Trump: Yeah, okay. Well, accurate is that nobody’s ever done a better job than I’m doing as president. That I can tell you. So that’s . . . And that’s the way a lot of people feel that know what’s going on, and you’ll see that over the years. But a lot of people feel that, Bob.

BW: I believe in our country, and because you’re our president, I wish you good luck.

Trump: Okay. Thank you very much, Bob. I appreciate it. Bye.

[Call ends]

[Recording ends]


theres vid for lazy.
Man, this Trump guy is one helluva nut job



Only Trump would be caught in such a reality distortion bubble as to think the man who took down Nixon would not be ambushing him. Asides from being thoroughly aggravating to listen to, it merely set up Trump for the release of the book and cemented his status as a man without a clue. Ugh
User avatar
KnicksGadfly
RealGM
Posts: 17,707
And1: 19,201
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
   

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#964 » by KnicksGadfly » Fri Sep 7, 2018 12:45 am

Well, now I know why Trump plays golf so much. Cause none of his cabinet wants him there to make decisions. Conservatives got it wrong and right.

There is a deep state, only Trump hired all of them.
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,387
And1: 62,517
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#965 » by HarthorneWingo » Fri Sep 7, 2018 2:21 am

It’s John Kelly, chief of staff


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Free Palestine
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#966 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Sep 7, 2018 3:37 am

This Kavanaugh guy is amazing. What a completely evasive BS artist.

Kamala Harris just got him to lie about his faulty memory. It is as close to perjury as possible.

Watch this:

https://crooksandliars.com/2018/09/sen-kamala-harris-knew-exactly-who

She knows exactly who he spoke to.

Now she's going to reveal some form of documentation confirming he spoke to the law firm of Trump's lawyer about the Russia investigation.

What this means is

(a) Kavanaugh just lied under oath

and

(b) he is conspiring to join SCOTUS to vote in Trump's favor on any ruling that reaches the court.

This should be bad news for Kavanaugh though we're in a bizarro universe where perjury doesn't seem to matter

but keep an eye out for Harris' reveal
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,387
And1: 62,517
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#967 » by HarthorneWingo » Fri Sep 7, 2018 3:44 am

Clyde_Style wrote:This Kavanaugh guy is amazing. What a completely evasive BS artist.

Kamala Harris just got him to lie about his faulty memory. It is as close to perjury as possible.

Watch this:

https://crooksandliars.com/2018/09/sen-kamala-harris-knew-exactly-who

She knows exactly who he spoke to.

Now she's going to reveal some form of documentation confirming he spoke to the law firm of Trump's lawyer about the Russia investigation.

What this means is

(a) Kavanaugh just lied under oath AGAIN

and

(b) he is conspiring to join SCOTUS to vote in Trump's favor on any ruling that reaches the court.

This should be bad news for Kavanaugh though we're in a bizarro universe where perjury doesn't seem to matter

but keep an eye out for Harris' reveal


Republicans only care about winning. That's it. We're just going to have to stack the Court when we take our shyt back.
Free Palestine
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#968 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Sep 7, 2018 3:49 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:This Kavanaugh guy is amazing. What a completely evasive BS artist.

Kamala Harris just got him to lie about his faulty memory. It is as close to perjury as possible.

Watch this:

https://crooksandliars.com/2018/09/sen-kamala-harris-knew-exactly-who

She knows exactly who he spoke to.

Now she's going to reveal some form of documentation confirming he spoke to the law firm of Trump's lawyer about the Russia investigation.

What this means is

(a) Kavanaugh just lied under oath AGAIN

and

(b) he is conspiring to join SCOTUS to vote in Trump's favor on any ruling that reaches the court.

This should be bad news for Kavanaugh though we're in a bizarro universe where perjury doesn't seem to matter

but keep an eye out for Harris' reveal


Republicans only care about winning. That's it. We're just going to have to stack the Court when we take our shyt back.


Lawd, I know, I know, but man this Kavanaugh guy is a complete POS. Makes me sick looking at that bastard smugly lying up there.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#969 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Sep 7, 2018 3:54 am

Trump's approval rating drop looks real, and it could be a disaster for the GOP in 2018

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/trump-approval-drop-midterms/index.html
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,387
And1: 62,517
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#970 » by HarthorneWingo » Fri Sep 7, 2018 3:56 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:This Kavanaugh guy is amazing. What a completely evasive BS artist.

Kamala Harris just got him to lie about his faulty memory. It is as close to perjury as possible.

Watch this:

https://crooksandliars.com/2018/09/sen-kamala-harris-knew-exactly-who

She knows exactly who he spoke to.

Now she's going to reveal some form of documentation confirming he spoke to the law firm of Trump's lawyer about the Russia investigation.

What this means is

(a) Kavanaugh just lied under oath AGAIN

and

(b) he is conspiring to join SCOTUS to vote in Trump's favor on any ruling that reaches the court.

This should be bad news for Kavanaugh though we're in a bizarro universe where perjury doesn't seem to matter

but keep an eye out for Harris' reveal


Republicans only care about winning. That's it. We're just going to have to stack the Court when we take our shyt back.


Lawd, I know, I know, but man this Kavanaugh guy is a complete POS. Makes me sick looking at that bastard smugly lying up there.


He's not even that smart. Some of his responses didn't pass the giggle test. Unfortunately, there's so much at stake. Anyhow, not that this will make a difference to republicans, but here's more evidence on his anti-abortion stance

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-birth-control_us_5b917b79e4b0162f472b3cb8
Free Palestine
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,387
And1: 62,517
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#971 » by HarthorneWingo » Fri Sep 7, 2018 4:00 am

It's Friday. Time for another Omarosa recording.

Edit: This woman does not disappoint! :lol:

https://pagesix.com/2018/09/06/omarosa-to-release-new-white-house-tape-on-the-view/
Free Palestine
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#973 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Sep 7, 2018 1:15 pm

Tick, Tick, Tick

10 days until Manafort Trial # 2
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#974 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Sep 7, 2018 1:23 pm

Donnie may want Kavanaugh on the court before Paulie Walnuts' trial starts to unveil more Russian intrigue.

If he wants to test his pardon powers on Manafort, having a partisan judge on SCOTUS may be foremost in his mind before he attempts that since it will certainly trigger a constitutional challenge that can reach SCOTUS.

Though SCOTUS judges normally recuse themselves as individuals there are two factors here that could come into play which is

(a) the other SCOTUS judges may tell Kavanaugh you need to recuse yourself and if he says no, that could be another set of uncharted waters to navigate,

and

(b) other litigants would surely file court challenges against the validity of Kavanaugh as a politically obligated appointee being able to rule on Trump's issues
User avatar
j4remi
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 38,253
And1: 20,197
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
         

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#975 » by j4remi » Fri Sep 7, 2018 1:25 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:It's Friday. Time for another Omarosa recording.

Edit: This woman does not disappoint! :lol:

https://pagesix.com/2018/09/06/omarosa-to-release-new-white-house-tape-on-the-view/


Trading White House recordings for tv spots...Capitalism at its finest.
C- Turner | Wiseman
PF- Hunter |Clowney | Fleming
SF- Strus | George
SG- Bridges | Dick | Bogdanovic
PG- Haliburton | Sasser
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#976 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Sep 7, 2018 1:32 pm

Unhinged is putting it mildly

‘I’m Winning,’ Trump Tells Montana Crowd as He Tries to Regain Control Amid Turmoil

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/06/us/politics/trump-rally-montana.html

QUOTES:

Reveling in his victimhood, Mr. Trump even likened himself to Abraham Lincoln, noting that Lincoln got poor reviews for the Gettysburg Address in 1863, before the speech was later regarded as one of the finest in the nation’s history.

“I have a feeling,” he told the crowd in remarks far longer than Lincoln’s, “that’s going to happen to us.”

...............

There were other reasons, outside of unflattering headlines, for Mr. Trump to be angry. Armed with leaked documents, Democrats continue to rail against Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, his nominee for the Supreme Court, and protesters persist in interrupting the judge’s confirmation hearings.

“Do you believe the anger and the meanness on the other side?” Mr. Trump said. “Sick. It’s sick.”
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#978 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Sep 7, 2018 1:38 pm

Definitely check this out

Conflicts and Investigations in Trump’s Troubled Administration

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/trump-administration-conflicts/
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,701
And1: 95,504
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#980 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Sep 7, 2018 3:20 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:Unhinged is putting it mildly

‘I’m Winning,’ Trump Tells Montana Crowd as He Tries to Regain Control Amid Turmoil

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/06/us/politics/trump-rally-montana.html

QUOTES:

Reveling in his victimhood, Mr. Trump even likened himself to Abraham Lincoln, noting that Lincoln got poor reviews for the Gettysburg Address in 1863, before the speech was later regarded as one of the finest in the nation’s history.

“I have a feeling,” he told the crowd in remarks far longer than Lincoln’s, “that’s going to happen to us.”

...............

There were other reasons, outside of unflattering headlines, for Mr. Trump to be angry. Armed with leaked documents, Democrats continue to rail against Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, his nominee for the Supreme Court, and protesters persist in interrupting the judge’s confirmation hearings.

“Do you believe the anger and the meanness on the other side?” Mr. Trump said. “Sick. It’s sick.”


Image


The bolded. That someone is going to shoot him in the head?

You think there were conspiracy theories around JFK?

Ho-lee-Sheet
Image

Return to New York Knicks