OK so this is by no means official. Good or bad defense in every sport is often very subjective and can fool our eyes easily. But I went back and watched the full game versus the Bucks to see who was dropping the ball on defense and see who was defending efficiently. I tried to devise a number system and then come up with actual defensive efficiency rankings based on minutes played without giving up a basket. This way we don't just have to rely on the good ole' "I saw so and so do a good job on that one play so that must mean they're good". Some of the results are surprising.
Explanation: I basically counted buckets given up by each individual player, buckets given up to due fouls, transition/fast break buckets given up, and finally open shots by a particular player's attacker. If the opponent penetrated and attacked, and there were 2 players defending, I counted a half a bucket against each. I then decided to divide into the amount of minutes for each player. I did the best I could in being as accurate as possible, but don't kill me if I missed something because it does take a lot of time whenever you do it manually, and there's bound to be some errors. Use it more as a guide, rater than a bible.
Here are the results.
Minutes
Lin - 41 minutes
Fields - 37 minutes
Melo - 37 minutes
Stat - 37 minutes
Davis- 31 minutes
Novak - 21 minutes
JR - 18 minutes
Harrellson - 14 minutes
Man to man, contested baskets allowed(not counting transition/fast breaks, foul or undefended, wide open buckets allowed)
Stat - 6
Melo - 5.5
Fields - 5
Lin - 4.5
Davis - 4
Novak - 4
Harrellson - 4
1. Efficiency: Minutes played without giving up a man to man basket(higher the better).
Lin = 9.1 minutes
Davis = 7.8 minutes
Fields = 7.4 minutes
Melo = 6.7 minutes
Stat = 6.7 minutes
JR = 6 minutes
Novak = 5.3 minutes
Harrellson = 3.5 minutes
AVG = 1 basket every 6.6 minutes per player, or 5 baskets every 6.6 minutes per group of 5
The difference between Lin and Harrellson is crazy. In man to man defense, he gave up nearly 3 baskets in the same time span it takes Lin to give up 1. Bet you didn't expect that. I know I didn't expect Davis and Lin to top the list. Lin was incredibly efficient followed by Davis and Fields. The only time they got scored on was mainly on 3's which is sort of expected. However, they did try to take Lin to the basket quite a few times, and simply didn't succeed. They failed to get by him and deferred. Surprisingly, Harrellson was terrible and gave up the most points in the shortest amount of time. In general, the Bucks targeted our bench guys who were our weakest links, Harrellson, Novak, and JR.
I don't know how to compare these numbers to an average, because I don't have a real life average, but if we did, it would probably say that our defense against the Bucks was anything BUT efficient. So these numbers, are probably indicative of bad defense.
To get a rough idea, looking at just the AVG of the group, having 5 guys playing at that average on the court at the same time for 48 minutes we'd be allowing 5 buckets or 10-12 points every 6.6 minutes. We're looking at giving up between 73-88 points per game, not counting foul points, wide open shots, and fast break points. Sounds about right against the Bucks, so the numbers aren't far off. So let's take a look at a couple of examples.
Example 1:
Comparing worst to best, if we had 5 Harrellsons on the court at the same time, playing as bad as he did then we'd be giving up roughly 5 buckets or 10-12 points every 3.5 minutes or anywhere between 137 and 164 points per game! And that's still not counting foul, transition or wide open baskets allowed!
So what does a 1 bucket every 3.5 min Harrelson defense inefficiency look like? Lovely...

And what's Novak doing you might ask? Well kiddos, it's called the Fck-if-I-know maneuver. And yes that is the score at the end of the 1st quarter. Thankfully, neither one of these clowns played for more than half the quarter.
Defensive play strategic breakdown(how it all comes together):
1. Completely fail to stop any attacker and look terrible.
2. Repeat.
Harrellson: "I got him. I got him.....I ain't got him"
Novak: "Freeze!"
Luc Richard: "Novak, what the hell are you doing? He shooting it."
Novak: "Fck-if-I-know."
Shump: "Well, I know. I knew that one was gonna drop before he even pumped it. Yo Mike, put me back on the bench, please, man. Why you gotta put me in with these 2? I can't do nothing about this....."
Result: 1 bucket per player every 3.5 minutes. Usually, massive blowouts. Benching.
Example 2:
Ok but it wasn't all that bad the entire night. Or at least it didn't look that bad. Harrellson was at the bottom of the pile, and looked pretty incompetent, but if you were to take some of the middle of the line guys, and play them for 48 minutes, surely it's going to be an improvement. So let's find out what our middle of the line Knicks defense looks like.
Say, a Stat/JR combo defense inefficiency? This one's tricky. Observe...

You have to actually look like you're defending while having no intention of doing such thing. Notice JR's strategic, and aggressive, side-step away from the attacker, so as to clear a lane for him. Meanwhile Stat increases speed just before he gently helps support the scorer's back as he dunks the basketball...but not before. That part's very important. Like I said, tricky. Which is why it's called the "Ah, my bad". We better break this one down too, just to make sure we understand it thoroughly.
Defensive play strategic breakdown:
1. Initial defender, aggressively steps out of the attacker's way to clear a lane to the basket. Why, you ask? No one really knows.
2. Trailing defender casually tries to catch-up from behind, then speeds up at the last second.
3. These events confuse the closest defender in position to make a stop, freezing him too.
4. Play it off, by either checking in the ball quickly or checking the air pressure of the ball.
JR: "Learned this from Stat against the Spurs... first I side step, then..."Get'em Stat."
Stat: "I'm cooooooooooooooming....
Fields: "Oh snap...Stat's gonna block?"
Stat: "Naah man, I said I was just coming over here. Someone's gotta check the ball back in."
Fields: " But...you looked like you were gonna jump and block that. And it's half time Stat."
Stat: "Ah, my bad."
Result: 1 bucket per player every 6 minutes. Typically, a regular blowout. Job security. Max contract.
Example 3:
Fortunately it's not all so bad. If we didn't count fouls and fast break points and we had 5 Lins, we're looking at anywhere between 52 and 63 points per game. That's quite a difference. Unfortunately most of this tends to go to waste in making up for a lot of what goes on above, and no one ever notices. Nevertheless, it's worth taking a look at anyway.
So what is it that Lin does that's so different? It's pretty Linsane...

He defends. This is simply called, the Linsteal. We should really break this one down.
Defensive strategic breakdown:
1. Keep your eye on the ball and anticipate the pass.
2. Move swiftly to intercept the pass.
3. Use aggression and energy to wrestle the ball away out of the opponents arms.
4. Pass the ball to Stat, who's waiving his arms asking for the ball and fails to score.
Lin: "I'm going to steal that damn ball and try to tie this game up."
Result: Lin steals the ball. No bucket. Can result in tying or winning. Side effect: Linsanity, raises excitement among teammates. Can result in benching for making others look bad. Use with caution!
Example 4:
And finally, I'm sure now the next question you'll have is what happens when you mix Lin's defense efficiency and middle of the pack guys like Stat and Melo together, working in tandem to stop the opponent. Well let's just have a look.
Lin/Amare/Melo combo defense, a high pressure situation, just before the clock runs out...

When you take Linsane defense efficiency and you mix it with "Ah my bad" middle of the pack defense, you get a new combo defense and as you probably guessed, it's simply called the "Ah, my bad, Lin". The amazing thing about this little beauty of a play, is that whenever one guy does an amazing job working his ass off, the other two players that have little interest in participating, can often get off the hook as long as they carefully manage to get in each others' way.
Defensive strategic breakdown:
1. Lin, chases opponent around like a mad-man, aggressively blocking his penetration.
2. Everyone else.......watches.
3. Eventually Lin forces attacker to take a bad shot.
4. Instead of rebounding, let it slip through your fingers and watch the opponent rebound the ball and score.
Lin: "You ain't getting by me. I wanna tie this game up."
Everyone else: "He ain't get by Lin. Lin's gonna help us tie this game up."
Jennings: " Dammit Lin, I cant fcking get by you. I'm a take this bad shot now and chuck it up.
Amare: "He gonna take a bad shot"
Melo: "Let's get it."
Amare: "Let me get it."
Ilyasova: "Nah, I got it. I score. I Ilyasova.
Lin: "Explicit language"
Amare & Melo: "Ah, my bad, Lin".
Result: Bucket. Side effects: Cursing. Angry Lin. Game loss. Embarrassment. Blame.
Well, that concludes Part 1 of our analysis, but...while Jeremy Lin and Davis turned out pretty efficient in man to man, the numbers, while still good are not nearly as amazing and efficient when counting fast break/wide open buckets allowed which is why next time(maybe) we'll look over Part 2 that is if Part 1 goes as well as I had planned. And yes, the rest of the crew can and often do get even worse. To be continued....
PS: I really wish the NBA should really do something like this and keep track of defense and defense efficiency using numbers and a similar system. I had no idea it would take so much time, and it would be so much work when I started so I don't plan on doing this for any other game. Thanks for reading. Hope you enjoyed.
