Page 1 of 74
Rose found not liable: Update pg. 62
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:50 pm
by robbysteinz
Oh boy. LAPD confirms.
New title to reflect updated info. XOXO - Cap
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:54 pm
by King of Canada
We saw this coming a mile away. Not to suggest it doesn't warrant an investigation, but the timing is clearly to avoid the accuser's name being released. It's no coincidence that this is coming out on media day either.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:55 pm
by F N 11
King of Canada wrote:We saw this coming a mile away. Not to suggest it doesn't warrant an investigation, but the timing is clearly to avoid the accuser's name being released. It's no coincidence that this is coming out on media day either.
Her name is already out though
And whats your source? I see one link and its not scary at all.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:58 pm
by camillepd
This puts pressure on roses legal team to quickly settle.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:01 pm
by King of Canada
K P 6 wrote:King of Canada wrote:We saw this coming a mile away. Not to suggest it doesn't warrant an investigation, but the timing is clearly to avoid the accuser's name being released. It's no coincidence that this is coming out on media day either.
Her name is already out though
And whats your source? I see one link and its not scary at all.
It's out there, but it's not really OUT there in the mainstream media yet. I don't have a source, but I have heard rumblings from here and there over the last week. I don't buy a clearly biased source like the one posted, but I wouldn't be surprised to see more official sources reporting it.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:02 pm
by Jay10
This could've been released on a Friday, but it being released on a Monday(will get an entire week of coverage), and especially Knicks media day says this is being done purposely to put pressure on Rose.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:07 pm
by moocow007
camillepd wrote:This puts pressure on roses legal team to quickly settle.
Possibly. Though from what I understand even though the plaintiff drops charges the prosecutor can still choose to continue with the case. So it's a risky ploy.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:09 pm
by NYKBaller
moocow007 wrote:camillepd wrote:This puts pressure on roses legal team to quickly settle.
Possibly. Though from what I understand even though the plaintiff drops charges the prosecutor can still choose to continue with the case. So it's a risky ploy.
Without the plaintiff cooperation the case wouldn't have any real substance
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:10 pm
by King of Canada
moocow007 wrote:camillepd wrote:This puts pressure on roses legal team to quickly settle.
Possibly. Though from what I understand even though the plaintiff drops charges the prosecutor can still choose to continue with the case. So it's a risky ploy.
That's what I was thinking. The state could still press charges, right? Also, if he doesn't settle and the criminal investigation doesn't lead to charges that could probably help his case.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:11 pm
by moocow007
What's the league policy for a team paying off the plaintiff in this case?
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:27 pm
by Capn'O
King of Canada wrote:We saw this coming a mile away. Not to suggest it doesn't warrant an investigation, but the timing is clearly to avoid the accuser's name being released. It's no coincidence that this is coming out on media day either.
This business with the name is pretty inexplicable by the defense. It looks worse for them (ethically) plus would obviously lead to escalation in response. If there's a method to their madness, I'm not yet seeing it.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:29 pm
by ChilledAlex
God damn the greed with this one, she already is embarassing herself why dive into even more hate?
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:39 pm
by AshyLarrysDiaper
Jay10 wrote:This could've been released on a Friday, but it being released on a Monday(will get an entire week of coverage), and especially Knicks media day says this is being done purposely to put pressure on Rose.
LAPD made this info available today. Why would they want to help the plaintiff's civil case?
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:39 pm
by Dkillanyk4lyf
This is crazy man.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:44 pm
by trophywinner
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:Jay10 wrote:This could've been released on a Friday, but it being released on a Monday(will get an entire week of coverage), and especially Knicks media day says this is being done purposely to put pressure on Rose.
LAPD made this info available today. Why would they want to help the plaintiff's civil case?
no they didn't. they made this available weeks ago. the accuser's lawyers had been threatening rose with this for some time now.
another thing, look at the date on the letter, 9/22/16. that was last thursday. today is monday 9/26/16. also knick's media day. they had been holding onto this for this very day.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:45 pm
by Dkillanyk4lyf
Honestly have we ever seen a dumber athlete than drose??
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:53 pm
by gavran
Why can a woman accuse a man of rape and be anonymus at the same time? Either both are anonymus, or neither. If the accusation turns out fake, Rose's reputation is gone, while she faces no scrutiny? Doesn't seem to equal to me.
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:19 pm
by delvec19
Sooo Brandon Jennings opening night starter?
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:21 pm
by Carl_Karlson
In the big picture, this doesn't matter. Rose is only with us for 1 year any way
Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:24 pm
by NoLayupRule
im not trying to minimize this but the simple fact is that Rose is innocent until proven guilty
this is out of our hands and is just a distraction unless it reaches a criminal conviction
which of course it won't
because the super rich don't go to jail 99.9% of the time
this will be negotiated out as they always are
but the thing we should remember is that he's not been found guilty, we don't know what happened, he doesn't seem to have a history of this kind of thing, and his private life isn't much of our concern anyway. We want him focused and successful in NYC, thats all