K P 6 wrote:mpharris36 wrote:K P 6 wrote:Fournette and Zeke says you need us. He's arguably better than both.
my question to you would it make more sense to get
Sam Darnold if he's available and then possibly someone like Sony Michel in the second round is that more value then Barkley and whoever we pick in the 2nd round?
I am not saying I would be upset...I would still be super pumped because I think he will be a great player. I'm just throwing out different scenarios. From a standpoint of running backs longevity and the cap ramifications...for such a high value pick!
My ideal is to move down to #4 with the bills moving to #2...so it goes QB, QB, QB and we get Barkley plus value to move down. That would make taking a RB that high better at least for me because we can fill other positions of need.
Youre thinking too hard. Hes the best player in the draft. We want to establish the running game and hes the final piece. Not to mention he can block and catch which helps Eli a chitload.
not really...this is what franchises do. Positions are weighted in the NFL.
If the best player was a safety...they still don't effect the game the same way QB, Left Tackles, and Defensive Ends.
Its just the way of the NFL and managing the cap (which is arguably the most important thing). Its really not over thinking it at all. The Giants have one superbowls with low round running backs.
I get it, I do. Barkely is a fantastic prospect both on and off the field and its very inciting I do agree. I trust DG to trust and evaluate the situation but this isn't a 100% lock situation for the factors I have laid out.