RealGM

IllmaticHandler wrote:

Jose7 wrote:

IllmaticHandler wrote:There is a bunch of people saying this...but

Don't Ever Listen to Anyone when the say Wingspan is not Important. Wingspan and Hand Size is always a Benefit. There is a reason why Long wingspans are coveted. Simply put, Players with Long Wingspans have advantages over dudes with short ones.


Rondo Will always be My favorite Sport Science.

Watch on YouTube

Think Kwahi would be a beast without that Wingspan? Yeah Okay.

Watch on YouTube

Prime Rondo...interesting **** player.

that's why I love me some Dejounte Murray..took him in two BATs back...

Frank man... I still think Orlando takes him but Im type hoping i'm wrong.

Murray Arms is ridiculous man. Its one of the reasons why I rock with that cat. I would not care about a Few PG's if I could get a hold of him. I will be FOREVER butt hurt that a PG like that falls that far to the SPURS of all people. We was thirsty as hell for pick last year. I will always feel that he should have been ours.

N Y K wrote:draft frank and then draft kostja get two guards with 7'0 wingspans... will that make everyone happy?

Jose7 wrote:

N Y K wrote:draft frank and then draft kostja get two guards with 7'0 wingspans... will that make everyone happy?

Dont know much about kostja...but **** aint just about wingspan.. we all know Frank has clout..he has skill with the body/athleticism..

N Y K wrote:draft frank and then draft kostja, and get two guards with 7'0 wingspans... will that make everyone happy?

Watch on YouTube

N Y K wrote:draft frank and then draft kostja, and get two guards with 7'0 wingspans... will that make everyone happy?

Watch on YouTube

HarthorneWingo wrote:

moocow007 wrote:

Grinditout wrote:http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/stephon-marbury-play-mike-antoni-doesn-article-1.305028

Marbury-Pringles was wonderful to watch, I don't know what you could possibly be talking about.

What I'm talking about is that you can't "simply just bench" Anthony without consequence. Anthony isn't Marbury. But even then, the reputation the Knicks had in part because of all their schenanigans had repercusions. Just look at what players wanted to sign with the Knicks. I'm not sure what you guys are not seeing. The notion that you can simply bench Anthony and be fine is ludicrous. Heck, you already see what bad mouthing Anthony does to your own players (see Porzingis). Now you want to bench him completely and think that that will be fine? Players (and the Players Union) don't hate Anthony like some fans do and absolutely there will be fallout from it.

Both Fox and Smith have expressed strong interest in being drafted by the Knicks. Phil is Fox's idol. F*ck the NBAPA. She's using Melo's situation to make a name for herself. Either that or she was pressured into taking that position.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

blueNorange wrote:what's wrong with drafting frank jackson at 8th?

i like his measurements.

Woodsanity wrote:

moocow007 wrote:

Woodsanity wrote:Do you guys think we can draft a good PG prospect with the 8th pick. I don't follow college hoops much so my knowledge of prospects is limited.

Depends on what the teams above us do and who you consider to be a PG from an NBA standpoint. In my mock I have Malik Monk going to the Knicks. He was listed as a PG as a top recruit coming out of HS but he was exclusively used as a SG by Kentucky. Monk displayed very little in the way of traditional PG skills at Kentucky and instead showed that he's extremely skilled at scoring. So is he a PG or is he a SG in the NBA? If the Knicks consider him a PG then sure, you can get a good PG.

Same with a guy like Ntilikina. Is he a PG or is he a SG with some PG skills? Listed as a PG I believe Ntilikina primarily functions as his teams SG. So...if you think that he's a PG then sure, he could be a good one as well.

But chances are probably pretty good that all of the other PG types will be gone by 8.

I am thinking more in the lines of a competent playmaker who can also shoot/score.

Thats what we really need. We need a good facilitator.

Deeeez Knicks wrote:Meanwhile the 2 best teams have trex arm pgs. You guys are crazy

Give me wings with crazy wingspan. Give me guards with skill

Deeeez Knicks wrote:Meanwhile the 4 best teams have trex arm pgs. You guys are crazy

Give me wings with crazy wingspan. Give me guards with skill

SMAC-K wrote:

Wingspan can't save you from being a bust

whocares1 wrote:

SMAC-K wrote:

Wingspan can't save you from being a bust

Yea but Frank's wingspan is 6'11. Instantly means that he's going to be better than all of them.

whocares1 wrote:

GONYK wrote:

King of Canada wrote:
Probably more like Monk or Isaac. I see that draft go down as 1)Fultz, 2)Ball, 3)Jackson, 4)Tatum/Fox 5)Fox/Tatum, 6)DSJR, 7)Frank, 8)The leftovers ie: Monk, I saac, etc...

Monk it is then

The Kings wouldn't pick Tatum I doubt it. Kings will go Smith/Fox/Monk.

Fultz
Ball
Jackson
Suns get Tatum
Kings get Smith or Monk
Magic get Smith or Monk or Isaac
Wolves get Isaac or Markannen or something
Knicks get Fox

King of Canada wrote:

NY2TheBay wrote:speaking of wingspans, this MJ wings poster was dope. had it in my room as a young buck.

My best friend had that one. I had the Bo Jackson poster.

SARGO127 wrote:Why are people high on Monk? He's basically Jamal Crawford.