3toheadmelo wrote:magnumt wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:hol up
why ain't we sign shabazz Muhammad over him?
Because Shabazz is undersized and would be more suitable at SG where we're stacked, whereas Beasley can play both SF and PF effectively.
he can play SF
anyways I'm not mad about the Beasley signing, I just think shabazz would be a better option since he has more upside
Even if Shabazz has more upside, we only wanted a bench player for the minimum. That's not to say he wouldn't help a team at that position. We just have other guys with upside at SG, and need to fill the hole at SF that we hope Melo will leave us with.