HEZI wrote:GONYK wrote:HEZI wrote:
The Knicks can't move on as long as Melo dictates whether he stays or goes. Knicks can say they are moving on all they want, Melo holds the cards. If he wants to stay for 2 more years, well then that's what will happen
Sure, but that hurts him more than us.
He can stay in NY if he wants, but the Knicks have no obligation to feature him, build around him in any way, or even play him at all.
If that is how he chooses to spend his career until he's 35, more power to him. But if his goal is to play with his friends, staying in NY isn't getting him any closer.
The Knicks are more eager to move on without him than he is eager to leave. Something tells me he'll be alright, he's got friends on the Knicks, his teammates seem to really like him, Phil Jackson is no longer around, the checks are still coming in, his family is happy in NY, etc. I don't see how him staying hurts him more than the Knicks, but as far as the Knicks go well that another 2 years of Melo drama and that's terrible for an organization that is eager to move on and looking for a "culture change"
Knicks have moved on either way.
If what you are saying has even the slightest hint of truth, there would be buyout talks or Ryan Anderson would be a Knick. Hell, Phil might still be the Prez if that were true.
The Knicks have been emphatic in their response to buyout talks. It is an unequivocal rejection.
If Melo is fine being here on a team where he plays no real meaningful role, has no say on the direction of the team, has no shot of winning, and has no chance of playing with his banana boat compadres, then I guess there is no problem. Everyone is cool.
If the Knicks' marketing didn't make it clear enough, I'm betting the coach's reaction to Melo being shot happy or not playing D will remind him of his new place in the pecking order.