Knicksfan1992 wrote:Isn't it known that NBA.com has much more accurate on/off splits? Wouldn't it be more prudent to use those? Not that i'm disputing what you're saying, I happen to agree, but showcasing Kanter a little bit helps us move him so it's whatever to me. What I'm confused by are the Baker inactives unless he's actually hurt. With the way we're playing defense now by blitzing everything he would only help...
No NBA.com calculates there's different from everyone else so the raw numbers are different but the net on/off is the same.
Knicksfan1992 wrote:Wow according to NBA.com we're 10 points better offensively per 100 possessions without Kanter and 7 points better defensively. It's early but that isn't a good sign... We're also 8 points better offensively with Baker which again confuses me why he's racking up DNP's smh
Bruh that's literally what I just posted. -17.1 with Kanter out there.
And @ everyone saying what they think as I say in the game thread every night as I'm hoping Kanter blows a knee out like Noah did, y'all blind if you think he's not trash. If the numbers said different I'd change up but instead they tell us he's as bad as Sessions and Lance in terms of negatively affecting our record. For example:
adjacent2bench wrote:What I like about Kanter is he helps the Knicks stay in the game early. Feel like he gets about 3 buckets every first quarter. At this point I like him as a starter. Plus his offensive rebounding has been crucial.
He does but we'd score those 3 buckets plus more (while giving up less on D) with him on the sideline.