K P 6 wrote:It’s clear Jeff wanted this one.
Priorities
Moderators: dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, GONYK, mpharris36, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully
K P 6 wrote:It’s clear Jeff wanted this one.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
tuna108 wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Clyde Frazier wrote:THJ with 39 min... Like you can't even make this **** up!
Frank and Dot COMBINED played 8 minutes LESS than Beas
Priorities
it's called the youth movement
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
GEOLINK wrote:Clyde Frazier wrote:THJ with 39 min... Like you can't even make this **** up!
And his stress fracture is acting up again... Thanks Hornacek.
Dantares wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:N Y K wrote:wild salty tonight
forreal. i was quiet most of the time in the game thread cause mad cats was actin salty.
we got ourselves a good tank win which is all that matters. lets get sexton here
What does Sexton do that Burke can't do? What are we going to hope Sexton becomes a 15/7 guard when burke can obviously do that right now. I mean I can understand giving up on mudiay but if Burke is a lead guard and plays close to 35 minutes next year then where will minutes come for Sexton who is only 6'2 and probably can't play in the same backcourt as burke.
Tron Carter wrote:clearly Archie Goodwin is a superstar because he dropped 29 as a rookie
Clyde Frazier wrote:GEOLINK wrote:Clyde Frazier wrote:THJ with 39 min... Like you can't even make this **** up!
And his stress fracture is acting up again... Thanks Hornacek.
Seriously, when he gets hurt again because hornacek ran him into the ground it's going to be so **** pathetic.
GEOLINK wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
Eww
He needs to cut his hair first.
GEOLINK wrote:Clyde Frazier wrote:GEOLINK wrote:And his stress fracture is acting up again... Thanks Hornacek.
Seriously, when he gets hurt again because hornacek ran him into the ground it's going to be so **** pathetic.
Nobody is thinking about next season.
This season has been over since January but he treats these meaningless games as must wins for some reason.
He's still getting fired after the season.
3toheadmelo wrote:Dantares wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:forreal. i was quiet most of the time in the game thread cause mad cats was actin salty.
we got ourselves a good tank win which is all that matters. lets get sexton here
What does Sexton do that Burke can't do? What are we going to hope Sexton becomes a 15/7 guard when burke can obviously do that right now. I mean I can understand giving up on mudiay but if Burke is a lead guard and plays close to 35 minutes next year then where will minutes come for Sexton who is only 6'2 and probably can't play in the same backcourt as burke.
trust me bro, i hear you on burke 100%. but it seems like we'll never give him a shot as a starter unfortuantely. until we do, im ridin with sexton. he can score at will, loves to play defense. and if we gettin sexton, im assuming we starting him next to frank.
if we actually let burke start right now and he kills it, no need to take a point guard in the draft at all.
Greenie wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Greenie wrote:
Bait?
Nah.
The stat nonsense is being called out.
People aren’t even in here slurping Smith. So don’t even try to twist it. They are calling out that suspect +\- you love so much when defending Frank.
+/- over the course of a year! when you constantly have a positive impact on the court for the most part it will eventually show up in the NET rating stat. I don't see why that is hard to understand. I have never said frank is positive that means he's great. I simple use the stat to say even if Frank is suspect right now on offense he isn't a net negative on the court.
That is all. You guys are blowing it out of proportion. And I never said you were baiting. Someone posted it to me out of nowhere to obviously bait. Why else u post it?
Don’t do that. You know damn well we talk game to game.
Let’s focus on this game.
Smith just posted a +17
Guess he was amazing.
No?
Ok. So then why last game when we were getting on Frank you literally pulled this very same stat out to say he was playing well? Not great. Well. Well enough for us to shut up.
That +17 for Smith surly means the same for you then, right?
No?
That’s the point.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
vallen wrote:
thats not a lot
DSJ has 287. like he said. skewed.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
GEOLINK wrote:I feel you Trey... I feel you bro.
But we gotta get this tank bro.
vallen wrote:
thats not a lot
DSJ has 287. like he said. skewed.