HarthorneWingo wrote:dakomish23 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:I don't see any And1s to your post.
Easier to blame Melo for everything wrong with this organization for two decades and caters to the Knicks are teflon way of thinking.
I’m surprised you didn’t get 50
C'mon man, are you really looking back on that trade and thinking "Yep, we need another Melo trade!" Giving up all those assets and draft picks? That trade set us back a whole bunch of years. Three first round exits don't do it for me.
We didn’t have 3 first round exits.
We didn’t send picks. We sent a pick and a swap. The other pick went for Bargs.
Also, to sign him, we would of had to let WC go
Also, if we don’t trade for him, there is an overwhelming likelihood that we make the DWill deal. You want to talk about setting back this franchise? Imagine the damage of having Amar’e and DWill on max contracts would do. Plus you likely still traded the same pick, except now it’s probably top 5 instead of #12.
You have said that you don’t want to keep losing and want to see them win. The only times we have winning records since 2001 is after the first 3 years of that deal. Shouldn’t that satiate your desire to win? Or is it you want to win but not if Melo’s on the team?
I didn’t want to do another blockbuster. I wanted to play the kids. I wanted to gladly accept whatever outcome happened by playing the kids (likely top 5 pick). I wanted to use any cap space to gain assets if it wasn’t for a legitimate stud. I wanted to trade the vets with value for assets. I wanted to try some lottery tickets to see if we could find a rotation guy or two.
Only one of those things happened - the last one. It turned out to be one of the few bright spots during this year.