Thugger HBC wrote:whocares1 wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:I can think of win now moves teams make. OKC adding PG and Melo, and in the process giving up some future pieces...for now, because both could opt out. That fits a win now move, in other words the expectations are being raised for the present.
Knicks did not do this at all. if y'all think signing Timmy, starting the season with ramon Sessions catapulted the Knicks into a win now stage, please just don't quote me.
Your “win now” is way too black and white. Essentially the team chose to play more experienced players over their rookies because of what? Wouldn’t it have made more sense to play Ntilikina 30 minutes and Jack 18? Dotson a spot in the rotation? Willy actually playing? KP not playing 40 minutes?
I think some of you want to apply win now for everything that fits y'all mold when there's zero evidence of such.
You cant have it both ways. if the Knicks supposedly thought frank was a developmental player, why would he play 30 minutes right out the gate when he doesn't even have NBA conditioning?
I haven't see a team play a project right off the bat with major minutes. Feel free to give examples of such.
Dotson I thought would play some more, but he certainly got some time in the G, and his owns words he said it helped him.
Not even commenting on Willy, everyone knows how I feel there, and as for KP, you're supposed to play your best player, right?
It's getting hard to track the different arguments here. I just wasn't convinced the FO thinks the Knicks "whiffed". Other than that, I think the Knicks stayed true to what they said at the beginning of the year. It was a rebuilding year, they didn't make any win now moves, and they always said they'd try to win some games while "developing" because developing was as much about getting younger and rebuilding the team as it was also about establishing culture and a certain way to play.
I mean, "development" everyone sort of tries to make about Frank, the latest rookie, or Dotson, when I think it had a lot to do with KP and THEN those guys. I mean, KP got featured a lot early, in the post. That was developmental.
There is all the year long fuss about Jeff, what he did or didn't do as far as "the youth" but more than anything, he coached what he had, tried to play young guys, within reason. But I divorce Jeff this season from "the rebuild". I think Mills/Perry gave him a "Phil-free" year to see if was worth it (while they suspected he wasn't) but that Mills and to some degree Perry, definitely considered the optics to Dolan of firing and paying a 3rd guy to do nothing. I mean, unfortunately, those decisions happen.
And now, they assessed Jeff and are moving on to the next phase, which is getting a coach who is in sync with what they want to do. I mean, on paper, it sounds good, and they are saying the right things. Now it's just a matter if the moves mostly bear that out.