drekwins wrote:dakomish23 wrote:drekwins wrote:
No... the game just changed. People don't realize that the rule changes have had a big effect on the game and the Knicks have been extremely slow to adapt. Prior to the Melo trade, the top teams were:
Miami - 102 PS/g, 94.6 PA/g
Boston - 96.5 PS/g, 91.1 PA/g
Chicago - 98.6 PS/g, 91.3 PA/g
Los Angeles - 101.5 PS/g, 95.4 PA/g
San Antonio - 103.7PS/g, 98 PA/g
The NBA has since gotten incredibly efficient due to the GS model of playing. ISO scoring is not nearly as emphasized and the center positon is gone. Offenses are now spread out, fast paced and rely on 3 point shooting. Contact is allowed less and less year after year.
When the Knicks brought in Melo and Amare, they thought that ISO scoring was important. At that time, they figured that guys like Melo and Amare could overcome the suffocating defense of LeBron, KG, Kobe, etc. Since they were the big obstacles to a ring, they thought that they would now have a chance since their top 2 guys could score on anyone. Just to show how drastically the game has changed, imagine that an inefficient Derek Rose was seen as a "superstar."
Then... Golden State came along, played small, shot a high percentage behind the arc on volume shots while also defending as well as anyone. In other words, the calculus changed. The Knicks haven't adapted.
Fast forward only 7 years later and the top 5 teams look like this:
Houston - 112.4 PS/g, 103.9 PA/g
Golden State - 113.5 PS/g, 107.5 PA/g
Toronto - 111.7 PS/g, 103.9 PA/g
Boston - 104 PS/g, 100.4 PA/g
Cleveland - 110.9 PS/g, 109.9 PA/g
Guess who leads the NBA in isolation frequency?
Harden.
Guess who’s 2nd?
CP3
Isolation basketball will never go away. The ability to score one on one is still one of the most important skill sets in the NBA. How you generate those looks & what options are available other than the person with the ball is what changed.
Okay... I don't disagree but those guys are also playmakers for others. Neither Melo or Amare were that. Neither was exceptional good at the 3 either. They're more different than they are alike.
If you’re saying that being a playmaker for others makes the person who does the ISO so much more of a weapon - I 100% agree.
To me the issue with going to get Amare & Melo was defense, real estate they like to occupy & the fit with the rest of the roster. Each one sucked on D. Each one liked working in the same area. Each one requires very specific surrounding pieces to maximize their impact.
If you had 3 3&D guys who also could pass well, then maybe it would of worked.