Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1717377
boomann21 wrote:
FemaleDogPlease wrote:Perry picked up a solid piece. I'm not expecting a future AllStar from this pick.
KOA wrote:I honestly don't get it either.
He's a good off-the ball player but Mikal is lightyears better.
Yes, he's young and has 4 years to catch up but he his work ethic is questionable so why does his age matter at all?
If we're lucky he'll be half as good as Mikal by the time he is 22. His eFG% is dreadful for a bigman largely due to all those mid-range shots he takes which are the least effective shot in basketball...
If you want to go for someone young and athletic with potential you take Michael Porter Jr and do not look back. How often do you get to take a potential #1 overall pick with the 9th pick in the draft?
right after the draft earlier in this threadK P 6 wrote:CoolKids wrote:jstudabaka wrote:This was a pretty disappointing night by and large. I really wanted Trae Young -- I think our missing him by a few spots may wind up being somewhat of a reprise of Curry/2009 (though probably not that bad obviously). And yeah, had we taken Porter, at least you could dream about the upside. Kevin Knox reeks of a Jordan Hill-ish-type pick where the organization just really didn't have an idea, so it went with a perceived safe option. Meh, the sad reality is that there is not a single good basketball player on the New York Knicks. That includes KP. He is a good player for one month a year, that's it. That's all he's ever accomplished. I'm not saying this to be pessimistic, though -- I'm actually getting at the silver lining: 1.) We'll be back in this next year LOL; 2.) The bar is so low for Knox that if he's anything resembling a legitimate NBA talent, he'll soon be a fan favorite.
Early favorite for worst post of the year?
When was this written?
page 8 or somethingDave DaButcher wrote:?s=21
3toheadmelo wrote:
boomann21 wrote:
MP4LIFE wrote:boomann21 wrote:MP4LIFE wrote:
STFU Knox.
You have nowhere near the talent of Porzingis.
Talent-wise, nah. Still not near the talent of Porzingis.
Doesn't mean he's bad, though. He's proving me wrong. Good.
Jose7 wrote:MP4LIFE wrote:boomann21 wrote:
Talent-wise, nah. Still not near the talent of Porzingis.
Doesn't mean he's bad, though. He's proving me wrong. Good.
MP4LIFE wrote:Jose7 wrote:MP4LIFE wrote:
Talent-wise, nah. Still not near the talent of Porzingis.
Doesn't mean he's bad, though. He's proving me wrong. Good.
Someone way more important and less sensitive than you.
Jose7 wrote:MP4LIFE wrote:Jose7 wrote:
Someone way more important and less sensitive than you.
important people don't make these type of comments.
you're still a little boy. keep on georgie.
CoolKids wrote:jstudabaka wrote:This was a pretty disappointing night by and large. I really wanted Trae Young -- I think our missing him by a few spots may wind up being somewhat of a reprise of Curry/2009 (though probably not that bad obviously). And yeah, had we taken Porter, at least you could dream about the upside. Kevin Knox reeks of a Jordan Hill-ish-type pick where the organization just really didn't have an idea, so it went with a perceived safe option. Meh, the sad reality is that there is not a single good basketball player on the New York Knicks. That includes KP. He is a good player for one month a year, that's it. That's all he's ever accomplished. I'm not saying this to be pessimistic, though -- I'm actually getting at the silver lining: 1.) We'll be back in this next year LOL; 2.) The bar is so low for Knox that if he's anything resembling a legitimate NBA talent, he'll soon be a fan favorite.
Early favorite for worst post of the year?
Dont you think robison is better equipped to guard stretch 4s than prozingis? Robinson is more agile and seems to have better lateral movement than KP.Clyde_Style wrote:blueNorange wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Wally's description of what a SF should do was a very transparent critique of the many years we had to endure watching the position played inefficiently. He's right. Glad we have a player who fits that bill.
he's today's forward.
kristaps has no choice but to play center because knox on the block is a mismatch nightmare.
Robinson will play center
Technically, KP will be PF and Knox SF, but those designations are essentially meaningless now
None of these traditional descriptions apply when building long and athletic like this.
Knox clearly is going to be a guy who often starts a play outside the paint and goes inside with one or two steps. And applies to KP too to a lesser degree.
They will both alternate between posting up, driving or shooting over the top of people. Calling them SF or PF doesn't matter any longer.
Robinson is our center at the very least on defense. It is possible FIz schemes Robinson differently on offense, but the same things that apply to KP and Knox on offense also apply to Robinson too. He can flash into the paint for lobs, he'll be our # 1 putback scorer, but we know he has the stroke so basically he can fit into any offensive scheme that suits KP and Knox.
The primary distinction for Knox is he will break down defenses more than the other two, but where they start their sets will probably be completely fluid for all of them and largely situational in nature.
blanko wrote:Dont you think robison is better equipped to guard stretch 4s than prozingis? Robinson is more agile and seems to have better lateral movement than KP.Clyde_Style wrote:blueNorange wrote:he's today's forward.
kristaps has no choice but to play center because knox on the block is a mismatch nightmare.
Robinson will play center
Technically, KP will be PF and Knox SF, but those designations are essentially meaningless now
None of these traditional descriptions apply when building long and athletic like this.
Knox clearly is going to be a guy who often starts a play outside the paint and goes inside with one or two steps. And applies to KP too to a lesser degree.
They will both alternate between posting up, driving or shooting over the top of people. Calling them SF or PF doesn't matter any longer.
Robinson is our center at the very least on defense. It is possible FIz schemes Robinson differently on offense, but the same things that apply to KP and Knox on offense also apply to Robinson too. He can flash into the paint for lobs, he'll be our # 1 putback scorer, but we know he has the stroke so basically he can fit into any offensive scheme that suits KP and Knox.
The primary distinction for Knox is he will break down defenses more than the other two, but where they start their sets will probably be completely fluid for all of them and largely situational in nature.
Sent from my LGM-V300K using Tapatalk
