ImageImageImageImageImage

NBA to eliminate one and done rule

Moderators: moocow007, magnumt, Jeff Van Gully, NoLayupRule, Thugger HBC, King of Canada, j4remi, mpharris36, Thorn, Deeeez Knicks, Capn'O, GONYK, K-DOT, mrpoetryNmotion

blanko
Pro Prospect
Posts: 950
And1: 384
Joined: Mar 14, 2015

Re: RE: Re: NBA to eliminate one and done rule 

Post#61 » by blanko » Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:29 am

The Uknickorn wrote:the young talent that comes in takes so many years to develop, the quality of the game gets tarnished... that being said, yep lebron will play with his son now wow lol
High school players and 1 and done players have been coming to the nba for over a decade. Especially 1 and done . this will change nothing. I actuallh want a euro football type system where children are signed at 15 so we dont have those dirty aau leaches around the kids

Sent from my LGM-V300K using Tapatalk
blue and orange
Veteran
Posts: 2,502
And1: 430
Joined: Nov 06, 2012
     

Re: NBA to eliminate one and done rule 

Post#62 » by blue and orange » Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:32 am

How is Calipari gonna survive without fielding a team of one and dones LOL. Duke has started doing that which is absolutely scary.
User avatar
K-DOT
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 7,755
And1: 8,273
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: NBA to eliminate one and done rule 

Post#63 » by K-DOT » Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:52 am

blanko wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:they should adjust rookie contracts as well

there are just gonna be more and more raw HS recruits now so teams are gonna sink years into their development and be faced with a player about to be worth something when his contract is up

also there are gonna be a lot of players drafted on pure conjecture without the college game as a measuring stick

in truth this might make the late lottery and post lottery picks much more valuable


and superstar college athletic programs worthless
Rookie contracts should be expanded to 5~6 years with team options after 3

Sent from my LGM-V300K using Tapatalk
How about if a player is drafted out of hs, they have two years of eligibility in the G League before their rookie contract kicks in, but they can't play in the NBA more than say 10 games a year during that time

Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
Lakers

Monk/Wright
Pat McCaw/Kennard
Ferguson/KBD
Melo/Winslow
Noel/Gortat

Reserves: Dieng, DJ Wilson, Isaac Bonga, Malachi Richardson

IR: JV

Jalen Ramsey on his football Mt Rushmore:

https://i.imgur.com/ioOaB6S.jpg
User avatar
NoLayupRule
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 46,649
And1: 9,188
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Playoffs Fool!
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: NBA to eliminate one and done rule 

Post#64 » by NoLayupRule » Thu Jul 12, 2018 8:49 pm

blanko wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:they should adjust rookie contracts as well

there are just gonna be more and more raw HS recruits now so teams are gonna sink years into their development and be faced with a player about to be worth something when his contract is up

also there are gonna be a lot of players drafted on pure conjecture without the college game as a measuring stick

in truth this might make the late lottery and post lottery picks much more valuable


and superstar college athletic programs worthless
Rookie contracts should be expanded to 5~6 years with team options after 3

Sent from my LGM-V300K using Tapatalk

i agree
User avatar
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 22,976
And1: 3,070
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: NBA to eliminate one and done rule 

Post#65 » by nykballa2k4 » Thu Jul 12, 2018 10:39 pm

NoLayupRule wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:actully I think it would fix both the nba and the NCAA if nba teams could draft a guy and then send him to college. It wouldn’t count on the cap but he would still get paid. He could develop and the team could decide if he stayed or came out. Better than the g league


I like that idea, but it doesn't make practical sense to me. In foreign leagues they do something similar with putting guys on loan no? however, it basically kills the facade of student athlete, it creates a disparity for the genders, also will put too many hands in the kitchen perhaps. If Lakers take Ball and want him at UCLA and want him to work on his scoring but UCLA needs him to pass the ball around to win, then there are competing odds. If the NBA wants Ayton shooting 3's, but Arizona needs him to be a behemoth inside, then who wins?

Part of the appeal he’s doing away with the fallacy of the student athlete

There’s already so much money and so much disparity in so much gender bias going on in college sports that destroying the whole system is the best thing that can happen to it.

As far as the practicality of how a player plays, I think that would just fall on the coach of the college team. There’s influence I’m sure between the NBA and the G league coaching styles but if you opt to leave your player in college then you’re on the risks and rewards that come with that. He gets trained by these great coaches but also runs the risk of learning style that isn’t yours and an injury.

I feel like years ago teams used to draft players that would then come into the NBA years later. I think we drafted bill Bradley before he came to the NBA by several years


destroying the system that we have means that guys like coach K are not going to be coaching college since revenue will tank.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
What do you think about @kporzee? Karl-Anthony Towns: PorzinGOD does not care or need my opinion for he is a higher life form then all of us.
User avatar
NoLayupRule
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 46,649
And1: 9,188
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Playoffs Fool!
Contact:

Re: NBA to eliminate one and done rule 

Post#66 » by NoLayupRule » Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:32 pm

nykballa2k4 wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
I like that idea, but it doesn't make practical sense to me. In foreign leagues they do something similar with putting guys on loan no? however, it basically kills the facade of student athlete, it creates a disparity for the genders, also will put too many hands in the kitchen perhaps. If Lakers take Ball and want him at UCLA and want him to work on his scoring but UCLA needs him to pass the ball around to win, then there are competing odds. If the NBA wants Ayton shooting 3's, but Arizona needs him to be a behemoth inside, then who wins?

Part of the appeal he’s doing away with the fallacy of the student athlete

There’s already so much money and so much disparity in so much gender bias going on in college sports that destroying the whole system is the best thing that can happen to it.

As far as the practicality of how a player plays, I think that would just fall on the coach of the college team. There’s influence I’m sure between the NBA and the G league coaching styles but if you opt to leave your player in college then you’re on the risks and rewards that come with that. He gets trained by these great coaches but also runs the risk of learning style that isn’t yours and an injury.

I feel like years ago teams used to draft players that would then come into the NBA years later. I think we drafted bill Bradley before he came to the NBA by several years


destroying the system that we have means that guys like coach K are not going to be coaching college since revenue will tank.

That’s fine too

I have mad respect for guys like Coach K and all they’ve done for sports at the same time they have been getting rich on unpaid labor from these kids for decades

If they can’t make that money anymore I’m not gonna shut a tear

I’m of the mindset that the people doing the actual work, taking the actual risk, and providing the actual entertainment deserve the lion share of the profit

Sure Coach K is amazing and he’s able to teach like crazy and there will be a market for that but maybe It’s not using unpaid labor getting colleges incredibly rich
knicksNOTslick
RealGM
Posts: 13,530
And1: 354
Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Location: NYC Queens
     

Re: NBA to eliminate one and done rule 

Post#67 » by knicksNOTslick » Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:53 am

As long as the G League continues to develop, I'm all for it. It's a lot more fluid now that players can be sent back and forth between leagues so it shouldn't be a big deal for players who still need development. Everyone should have the option of going pro after they graduate HS. Kids like Mitchell Robinson would've been a lottery pick but hurt their draft stock just because they sat out a year.

Return to New York Knicks