FKF wrote:Fizdale’s tank machine can’t win a game, but they didn’t lose the Porzingis trade. Too bad owner James Dolan wouldn’t let Jackson trade him 20 months ago when the Zen Master envisioned Porzingis’ Knicks career as a short one.
Funny that him now envisioning Phil may have been right to want a KP trade in the first place.
With all what was printed against Phil since two years ... Talk about Knicks spinning
Though ...
Booker + Markannen
VS
Smith Jr, expirings and two unknown picks
To me, Phil’s > Perry’s
Phil would have also not signed Hardaway, and just waived Melo instead of trading for Kanter.
Your thoughts ...
this kind of revisionism is foolish
The main reason we lost Porzingis to begin with was Jackson’s treatment of Anthony - marganilizing him, making him feel unwanted, then toying with him as they tried to trade him
Seeing that treatment of the franchise player made Kp suspect his own role as the new franchise player
Understandably.
Also wanting to trade him at his height for no reason but a personal snub isn’t good gming or great knowledge. It’s petty. Remember Phil never made a good free agent signing beyond role players and never made a good trade.
Perry trades Kp before the total meltdown. It’s totally different.
Any revisionist heroism of Jackson’s is just a new way to poop on the knicks of today
Berman remains the biggest knicks troll on the Internet. His newfound love of Jackson is pure trolling. Berman was banned from Jackson’s knicks at one point and that may have lead to him losing his post at the post. Berman is just trying to troll from a new platform