watchmen77 wrote:cgmw wrote:aq_ua wrote:In other words, if moral high ground were the minimum requirement to point out blatant faults in others, we’d have a society with pretty much no oversight. Strange arguments seem the norm now.
The honest answer would have been:
“Sorry, I will not speak freely of my personal political beliefs because I value and enjoy the benefits of continued employment—including my house, my kids’ tuition, my family vacations, and my ever-growing retirement fund.”
Instead Kerr’s lies risk proselytizing younger/ less-educated listeners into dismissing social issues in China.
well, who cares? maybe it is best to let Chinese deal with their own issues while we deal with ours? Already approved by facts, that many time when we try to get involved with other people's issues, their home burned to ground.
So just let them be and maybe, just maybe, we can live in a better world.
Excuse us, but Hong Kong and Taiwan are not just a Chinese problem. If China establishes authoritarian rule in Hong Kong, they will go after Taiwan too when the time is right. It sure as hell does matter to the world what happens there, just like it does matter that our strongest allies in the fight against ISIS were just thrown to the wolves and now there are cell breaks of high level ISIS detainees dispersing as U.S. troops withdraw with no advance planning. ISIS will now regroup. I suppose nothing matters outside our borders then.