Are We Ther Yet wrote:Sark wrote:robillionaire wrote:
This is historically true however I don't think we overpaid for any big men, randle was a good signing and the one year deals are one year deals and the reason we even had all the cap space was because they didn't want to overpay for a big man in KP
I literally posted on the previous page that Randle's 3 year value is $49m, and we paid him $62m. So either you think the math is wrong, in which case I'd love to see the math that shows him worth more, or you have a different definition of "overpay".
He's young and you have to hope he is still going to improve. He's just getting to his"prime" years. You can't use his development years stats as the value benchmark unless you think that's his ceiling.
That's literally the exact same excuse used to justify Tim Hardaway's contract, from a few years back.