Jeff Van Gully wrote:i'd like to call the "jonathan isaac is trash" contingent to the front of the congretation.
I would too. And shake their hand for helping my BAF squad!
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Jeff Van Gully wrote:i'd like to call the "jonathan isaac is trash" contingent to the front of the congretation.
thebuzzardman wrote:
Kind of sucks the Knicks don't own their own 2nd's for those years but I like that the FO was able to get a pair back to replace them.
I guess it's a toss up who will be worse, Knicks or Charlotte, but I'd assume the Knicks. In effect, it's like having our own 2nd round picks, but lost 5 or 6 spaces in the order.
K-DOT wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Kind of sucks the Knicks don't own their own 2nd's for those years but I like that the FO was able to get a pair back to replace them.
I guess it's a toss up who will be worse, Knicks or Charlotte, but I'd assume the Knicks. In effect, it's like having our own 2nd round picks, but lost 5 or 6 spaces in the order.
You wanna know why we don't own our 2nds for the next 2 years?
Because we traded them to get the pick which became Willy
Then we traded Willy to Charlotte for their two 2nds
So in essence, we traded our 2nds in 20 and 21 for Charlotte's 2nds in 20 and 21 straight up
thebuzzardman wrote:K-DOT wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Kind of sucks the Knicks don't own their own 2nd's for those years but I like that the FO was able to get a pair back to replace them.
I guess it's a toss up who will be worse, Knicks or Charlotte, but I'd assume the Knicks. In effect, it's like having our own 2nd round picks, but lost 5 or 6 spaces in the order.
You wanna know why we don't own our 2nds for the next 2 years?
Because we traded them to get the pick which became Willy
Then we traded Willy to Charlotte for their two 2nds
So in essence, we traded our 2nds in 20 and 21 for Charlotte's 2nds in 20 and 21 straight up
I had an idea it was the WHG picks, or one of them was in there. It's wild that it's two of them.
But I like that kind of approach by the Knicks. They moved up to get WHG for the KP connection. Traded some future assets in 2nd rounders - not wild about that, but I like being bold like that, but then later than later basically recovered those picks.
Knicks do some messed up stuff, but this sequence by the FO was pretty good.
Rasho Brezec wrote:
god shammgod wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:K-DOT wrote:You wanna know why we don't own our 2nds for the next 2 years?
Because we traded them to get the pick which became Willy
Then we traded Willy to Charlotte for their two 2nds
So in essence, we traded our 2nds in 20 and 21 for Charlotte's 2nds in 20 and 21 straight up
I had an idea it was the WHG picks, or one of them was in there. It's wild that it's two of them.
But I like that kind of approach by the Knicks. They moved up to get WHG for the KP connection. Traded some future assets in 2nd rounders - not wild about that, but I like being bold like that, but then later than later basically recovered those picks.
Knicks do some messed up stuff, but this sequence by the FO was pretty good.
willy aint sh*t
god shammgod wrote:willy aint sh*t
21 Hussle wrote:It’s an intriguing thought. From what it sounds like it’s similar to what they do in soccer.
Mecca wrote:I think LaVine is the next big name to go.
Don’t hurt me, but if we can swing Randle, Trier & a Dallas #1 for LaVine, you do it.
Cole Anthony
LaVine
Frank
Barrett
Mitch
Small ball lineup is everything I want in the universe
Mecca wrote:I think LaVine is the next big name to go.
Don’t hurt me, but if we can swing Randle, Trier & a Dallas #1 for LaVine, you do it.
Cole Anthony
LaVine
Frank
Barrett
Mitch
Small ball lineup is everything I want in the universe
HEZI wrote:Mecca wrote:I think LaVine is the next big name to go.
Don’t hurt me, but if we can swing Randle, Trier & a Dallas #1 for LaVine, you do it.
Cole Anthony
LaVine
Frank
Barrett
Mitch
Small ball lineup is everything I want in the universe
Bulls not trading Lavine for another bigman bro. That's not a realistic trade
Chanel Bomber wrote:Mecca wrote:I think LaVine is the next big name to go.
Don’t hurt me, but if we can swing Randle, Trier & a Dallas #1 for LaVine, you do it.
Cole Anthony
LaVine
Frank
Barrett
Mitch
Small ball lineup is everything I want in the universe
Ok but the 2023 top-10 protected pick.
The 2021 is unprotected, Lord knows where it's gonna fall. LaVine hasn't played well this season but Boylen is a spectacularly bad coach. I would trade for him in a heartbeat.
Frank
LaVine
RJ
Morris
Mitch
At least there's more shooting and more ball-handling. I do like Trier better than Knox though so... *ducks.