Clyde_Style wrote:Richard4444 wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
I don't like beating up on Knox, Frank or Obi because it just feels dirty. It's not their fault they were drafted with the 8th pick in the draft. I had hopes for Frank, but him and Knox lack the fire you need to make it.
We should have a Luka or Lamelo by now. The reality is there enough Knicks fans who would have supported a full-blown tank to mitigate any public pressure on Dolan to win meaningless games. That's the real irony. He had a guaranteed income stream with little risk if he tanked, so the pressure to starphuck is more a fiction of the mind than a reality.
The games were won by the players. Not Dolan. Players don't tank.
And the players were not playing well last year. Randle was awful. Mitch was still a reserve. Bullock was shooting poorly. Harkless is a bum. Portis was lost in the system. Payton was playing surprisingly well. But he could run out of luck anytime because he has no talent at all. We did not have different makers that could win consistently single handed the games to jeopardize the tank. We would have 15 tough games left to properly tank if the pandemic did not have happened.
Players don't tank. Who you play is the topic though, right?
You can purposefully tank as a FO and coach by playing less experienced players who probably will win less games. And in the process they gain some experience regardless of whether they amount to anything as players in the future.
There are 4 problems:
1) We were giving time to our young players: RJ, Mitch, Frank and Knox. Dennis was beyond awful and Dotson is not young.
2) Any player we would get from G-league can win some games. He can improve the team. Especially in the short term (super concentration, motivation, they will play any game as a championship final).
3) If we cut playing time from vets in a contract year, we get kind of burned among agents and we can need them to land stars later. And our vets were playing poorly. No reason to irritate them.
4) If we keep playing the vets, it could help to develop chemistry. It may have worked. The team really improved one year later. That game's sequence could have helped. If we play the worst players to tank, we throw away all the other options to improve.