Appleshampoo wrote:How about Norman Powell, TJ McConnell, and Will Barton.
None of these guys can create easy shots for both themselves and others.
Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, mpharris36, GONYK, HerSports85
Appleshampoo wrote:How about Norman Powell, TJ McConnell, and Will Barton.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
moocow007 wrote:Appleshampoo wrote:How about Norman Powell, TJ McConnell, and Will Barton.
None of these guys can create easy shots for both themselves and others.
moocow007 wrote:Appleshampoo wrote:How about Norman Powell, TJ McConnell, and Will Barton.
None of these guys can create easy shots for both themselves and others.
Guano wrote:this thread is depressing
cgf wrote:Oubre has the looks, but not the game.
Guano wrote:this thread is depressing
Appleshampoo wrote:moocow007 wrote:Appleshampoo wrote:How about Norman Powell, TJ McConnell, and Will Barton.
None of these guys can create easy shots for both themselves and others.
Really? It seemed like in fantasy basketball McConnell had 15 assist nights once a week. Barton and Powell would be upgrades to Bullock and Burks.
Ghetto Gospel wrote:moocow007 wrote:Appleshampoo wrote:How about Norman Powell, TJ McConnell, and Will Barton.
None of these guys can create easy shots for both themselves and others.
surely that can't be the barometer for who gets picked up, only stars can do that and lord knows those aren't readily available
moocow007 wrote:Appleshampoo wrote:moocow007 wrote:
None of these guys can create easy shots for both themselves and others.
Really? It seemed like in fantasy basketball McConnell had 15 assist nights once a week. Barton and Powell would be upgrades to Bullock and Burks.
McConnel is coming off his most productive offensive season of his 6 year career and he managed just 8.6ppg and 6.6apg. Yes he shot 55% from the field but that's because he only took 7 shots a game and didn't try things he can't do offensively. That's not what the Knicks need for at starting PG.
Barton and Powell being upgrades over Bullock and Burks? Sure. But it doesn't mean that their elevated salaries are going to be worth it respective to Bullock or Burks is going to make it worth it.
Do you really believe that if the Knicks had these 3 guys instead of Bullock and Burks that they'd have made it past Atlanta? I don't.
HarthorneWingo wrote:moocow007 wrote:Appleshampoo wrote:
Really? It seemed like in fantasy basketball McConnell had 15 assist nights once a week. Barton and Powell would be upgrades to Bullock and Burks.
McConnel is coming off his most productive offensive season of his 6 year career and he managed just 8.6ppg and 6.6apg. Yes he shot 55% from the field but that's because he only took 7 shots a game and didn't try things he can't do offensively. That's not what the Knicks need for at starting PG.
Barton and Powell being upgrades over Bullock and Burks? Sure. But it doesn't mean that their elevated salaries are going to be worth it respective to Bullock or Burks is going to make it worth it.
Do you really believe that if the Knicks had these 3 guys instead of Bullock and Burks that they'd have made it past Atlanta? I don't.
Are you going to be the first to break 100,000 posts?
HarthorneWingo wrote:moocow007 wrote:Appleshampoo wrote:
Really? It seemed like in fantasy basketball McConnell had 15 assist nights once a week. Barton and Powell would be upgrades to Bullock and Burks.
McConnel is coming off his most productive offensive season of his 6 year career and he managed just 8.6ppg and 6.6apg. Yes he shot 55% from the field but that's because he only took 7 shots a game and didn't try things he can't do offensively. That's not what the Knicks need for at starting PG.
Barton and Powell being upgrades over Bullock and Burks? Sure. But it doesn't mean that their elevated salaries are going to be worth it respective to Bullock or Burks is going to make it worth it.
Do you really believe that if the Knicks had these 3 guys instead of Bullock and Burks that they'd have made it past Atlanta? I don't.
Are you going to be the first to break 100,000 posts?
Oops, never mind. I forgot that shammgod was on his third 100,000.
moocow007 wrote:Ghetto Gospel wrote:moocow007 wrote:
None of these guys can create easy shots for both themselves and others.
surely that can't be the barometer for who gets picked up, only stars can do that and lord knows those aren't readily available
So you want to eat up the bulk of the salary cap adding more role players? The Knicks are one of the least talented teams in the NBA That IS the reason they got hammered by the Hawks. These 3 guys don't really add the type of talent that would have made them significantly more talented than the counterparts that they would have replaced (Rose, Burks and Bullock).
moocow007 wrote:Appleshampoo wrote:moocow007 wrote:
None of these guys can create easy shots for both themselves and others.
Really? It seemed like in fantasy basketball McConnell had 15 assist nights once a week. Barton and Powell would be upgrades to Bullock and Burks.
McConnel is coming off his most productive offensive season of his 6 year career and he managed just 8.6ppg and 6.6apg. Yes he shot 55% from the field but that's because he only took 7 shots a game and didn't try things he can't do offensively. That's not what the Knicks need for at starting PG.
Barton and Powell being upgrades over Bullock and Burks? Sure. But it doesn't mean that their elevated salaries are going to be worth it respective to Bullock or Burks is going to make it worth it.
Do you really believe that if the Knicks had these 3 guys instead of Bullock and Burks that they'd have made it past Atlanta? I don't.
Ghetto Gospel wrote:moocow007 wrote:Ghetto Gospel wrote:
surely that can't be the barometer for who gets picked up, only stars can do that and lord knows those aren't readily available
So you want to eat up the bulk of the salary cap adding more role players? The Knicks are one of the least talented teams in the NBA That IS the reason they got hammered by the Hawks. These 3 guys don't really add the type of talent that would have made them significantly more talented than the counterparts that they would have replaced (Rose, Burks and Bullock).
I don't necessarily disagree because those guys don't really move the needle. The short-term guys we picked up last year (Rose, Burks and Bullock) played their way into probably getting a nice new deal either with us or another team.
Is the play really just to sign scraps to 1 year deals until a superstar says they want to play in NY?
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
John Murdoch wrote:Yall want Schruder?
Ghetto Gospel wrote:John Murdoch wrote:Yall want Schruder?
nah we watched the playoffs
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
Ghetto Gospel wrote:moocow007 wrote:Ghetto Gospel wrote:
surely that can't be the barometer for who gets picked up, only stars can do that and lord knows those aren't readily available
So you want to eat up the bulk of the salary cap adding more role players? The Knicks are one of the least talented teams in the NBA That IS the reason they got hammered by the Hawks. These 3 guys don't really add the type of talent that would have made them significantly more talented than the counterparts that they would have replaced (Rose, Burks and Bullock).
I don't necessarily disagree because those guys don't really move the needle. The short-term guys we picked up last year (Rose, Burks and Bullock) played their way into probably getting a nice new deal either with us or another team.
Is the play really just to sign scraps to 1 year deals until a superstar says they want to play in NY?
John Murdoch wrote:Ghetto Gospel wrote:John Murdoch wrote:Yall want Schruder?
nah we watched the playoffs
Trust me most of us hate him too , jus curiois as to what his market will be in FA everyone keeps sayin knicks