Polk377 wrote:knicksNOTslick wrote:Adelheid wrote:What was apparent in my eyes is that Knicks would normally choose guys with great measurables but very basic bball talent and at times, raw -- which is bad when you consider that the knicks are not good at developing rooks.
That's why I wanted Mikal Bridges that year. He was the more proven player but didn't seem to have the ceiling the other prospects did.
I wanted Miles. Given what has happened with him that would have been the most Knicks thing that could have happened. Would have gotten a budding star only to get banned from the league in his contract year.
I wanted Miles too. But I'll tell you something you may find funny. When I saw Miles I saw him as a skilled bullyball small forward and would be awesome. Critics told me he'd be trash cuz he'd end up a 6'5 PF.
What's crazy is they were right in that he sortve is a a 6'5 PF except he is pretty awesome at it.