#9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 8:07 pm
RealGM
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
#9 - Got Mitch?
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2219683
Page 1 of 100
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 8:12 pm
Let's discuss the Melo trade! 
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 8:15 pm
Are We Ther Yet wrote:Let's discuss the Melo trade!
Gallo plus Chandler too much!
Also
Gallo > Chandler
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 8:17 pm
thebuzzardman wrote::D
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 8:52 pm
We locked up our center
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:15 pm
Wish we didn’t got Mitch
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:25 pm
august 14th.. i think it happens in this one of my mathematical analyst is accurate
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 10:23 pm
September 1st is my guess- lakers may want Beasley from Utah instead of Frenchy
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 10:27 pm
Is this It?
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 10:42 pm
spree2kawhi wrote:Is this It?
Yes.
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 10:46 pm
Onwards to 100 pages of nothing!!
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 10:50 pm
Would you sacrifice Obi to keep Grimes?
Discuss
Rose/Cam/Obi Knicks 2023/25/27/29/Wizards or Piston pick 5 first rounders, Obi is the "young player" (so it's 6 picks/youth like went for Gogurt) and Cam is kind of "young player" but in this case he's in there because he's expiring, like Rose
Knicks keep:
Fourskinier/Grimes/IQ/Mavs 2023/Detroit 2025
They'll need a backup PF
Brunson/IQ
Mitchell/Grimes
Fournier/RJ
Randle/? (Melo? RJ playing some small ball 4?)
Hartenstein/Mitch
Discuss
Rose/Cam/Obi Knicks 2023/25/27/29/Wizards or Piston pick 5 first rounders, Obi is the "young player" (so it's 6 picks/youth like went for Gogurt) and Cam is kind of "young player" but in this case he's in there because he's expiring, like Rose
Knicks keep:
Fourskinier/Grimes/IQ/Mavs 2023/Detroit 2025
They'll need a backup PF
Brunson/IQ
Mitchell/Grimes
Fournier/RJ
Randle/? (Melo? RJ playing some small ball 4?)
Hartenstein/Mitch
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 11:15 pm
thebuzzardman wrote:Are We Ther Yet wrote:Let's discuss the Melo trade!
Gallo plus Chandler too much!
Also
Gallo > Chandler
Mozgov is going to be a stud.
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 11:16 pm
thebuzzardman wrote:Would you sacrifice Obi to keep Grimes?
Discuss
Rose/Cam/Obi Knicks 2023/25/27/29/Wizards or Piston pick 5 first rounders, Obi is the "young player" (so it's 6 picks/youth like went for Gogurt) and Cam is kind of "young player" but in this case he's in there because he's expiring, like Rose
Knicks keep:
Fourskinier/Grimes/IQ/Mavs 2023/Detroit 2025
They'll need a backup PF
Brunson/IQ
Mitchell/Grimes
Fournier/RJ
Randle/? (Melo? RJ playing some small ball 4?)
Hartenstein/Mitch
I would trade Obi just because I want to see him actually play...
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 11:20 pm
nykballa2k4 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Would you sacrifice Obi to keep Grimes?
Discuss
Rose/Cam/Obi Knicks 2023/25/27/29/Wizards or Piston pick 5 first rounders, Obi is the "young player" (so it's 6 picks/youth like went for Gogurt) and Cam is kind of "young player" but in this case he's in there because he's expiring, like Rose
Knicks keep:
Fourskinier/Grimes/IQ/Mavs 2023/Detroit 2025
They'll need a backup PF
Brunson/IQ
Mitchell/Grimes
Fournier/RJ
Randle/? (Melo? RJ playing some small ball 4?)
Hartenstein/Mitch
I would trade Obi just because I want to see him actually play...
Pro answer. 99 pages to go.
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 11:31 pm
thebuzzardman wrote:nykballa2k4 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Would you sacrifice Obi to keep Grimes?
Discuss
Rose/Cam/Obi Knicks 2023/25/27/29/Wizards or Piston pick 5 first rounders, Obi is the "young player" (so it's 6 picks/youth like went for Gogurt) and Cam is kind of "young player" but in this case he's in there because he's expiring, like Rose
Knicks keep:
Fourskinier/Grimes/IQ/Mavs 2023/Detroit 2025
They'll need a backup PF
Brunson/IQ
Mitchell/Grimes
Fournier/RJ
Randle/? (Melo? RJ playing some small ball 4?)
Hartenstein/Mitch
I would trade Obi just because I want to see him actually play...
Pro answer. 99 pages to go.
We need a photoshop putting Toppins face in here.
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2022 11:53 pm
thebuzzardman wrote:Would you sacrifice Obi to keep Grimes?
Discuss
Rose/Cam/Obi Knicks 2023/25/27/29/Wizards or Piston pick 5 first rounders, Obi is the "young player" (so it's 6 picks/youth like went for Gogurt) and Cam is kind of "young player" but in this case he's in there because he's expiring, like Rose
Knicks keep:
Fourskinier/Grimes/IQ/Mavs 2023/Detroit 2025
They'll need a backup PF
Brunson/IQ
Mitchell/Grimes
Fournier/RJ
Randle/? (Melo? RJ playing some small ball 4?)
Hartenstein/Mitch
Nope, our future hinges on keeping OBI and moving Randle.There's speculation that D Mitch doesn't want to play with Randle anyway.
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 12:36 am
Got for reals I actually do have my own Metric.
It’s called SAM.
It’s stands for Statistical Accumulation metric.
1. The stat is looking for a theoretical ‘20 point threshold ‘
2. This is accumulated by points and rebounds per game. Target score 20.
Or
3. Fgm and assists combined target score of 10. Theoretically accumulating 20 points of offense created .
Simple enough .
Only Knicks players to meet SAM are RJ and Randle.
Brunson meets the criteria as well.
Teams like Raptors have 5 guys to meet SAM qualifications.
The 76ers 4.
The Bulls 3 with an almost in Lonzo .
To me this is a REAL impact metric because there is nothing more impactful than actual statistical accumulation.
To me it checks outon the Knicks . Who besides RJ and Randle even really did anything last year?
Fournier was next closest but we all know he didn’t have much impact.
Guys like Obi just don’t have a body of work .
Anyways that’s just for fun but it’s something I actually did use for some actual basketball application . Never really named it until now but name isn’t that important bet I can think of something better.
Examples :
Rj - 20 ppg | qualified
Randle -20 ppg | qualified
Brunson - 16.3 ppg + 3.9rpg =20.2 | qualified
Fournier - 14.1 ppg + 2.6rpg =16.7 | not qualified
5 fgm + 2.1asp = 7.1 | not qualified
It’s called SAM.
It’s stands for Statistical Accumulation metric.
1. The stat is looking for a theoretical ‘20 point threshold ‘
2. This is accumulated by points and rebounds per game. Target score 20.
Or
3. Fgm and assists combined target score of 10. Theoretically accumulating 20 points of offense created .
Simple enough .
Only Knicks players to meet SAM are RJ and Randle.
Brunson meets the criteria as well.
Teams like Raptors have 5 guys to meet SAM qualifications.
The 76ers 4.
The Bulls 3 with an almost in Lonzo .
To me this is a REAL impact metric because there is nothing more impactful than actual statistical accumulation.
To me it checks outon the Knicks . Who besides RJ and Randle even really did anything last year?
Fournier was next closest but we all know he didn’t have much impact.
Guys like Obi just don’t have a body of work .
Anyways that’s just for fun but it’s something I actually did use for some actual basketball application . Never really named it until now but name isn’t that important bet I can think of something better.
Examples :
Rj - 20 ppg | qualified
Randle -20 ppg | qualified
Brunson - 16.3 ppg + 3.9rpg =20.2 | qualified
Fournier - 14.1 ppg + 2.6rpg =16.7 | not qualified
5 fgm + 2.1asp = 7.1 | not qualified
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:03 am
thebuzzardman wrote:Would you sacrifice Obi to keep Grimes?
Discuss
Rose/Cam/Obi Knicks 2023/25/27/29/Wizards or Piston pick 5 first rounders, Obi is the "young player" (so it's 6 picks/youth like went for Gogurt) and Cam is kind of "young player" but in this case he's in there because he's expiring, like Rose
Knicks keep:
Fourskinier/Grimes/IQ/Mavs 2023/Detroit 2025
They'll need a backup PF
Brunson/IQ
Mitchell/Grimes
Fournier/RJ
Randle/? (Melo? RJ playing some small ball 4?)
Hartenstein/Mitch
No. Too many picks. Take back one of our picks at LEAST. I don't care which young player goes but....it makes more sense to send a guard than a PF for Mitchell. So one of IQ/Grimes and if it's Grimes they want...I would be inclined to send him.
Re: #9 - Got Mitch?
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:14 am