RealGM

Seeing how the DM trade was 100 pages of no trade talks perhaps we should separate the topic. Another trade thread can happen or not but, there is discussion unrelated that doesn't need to derail yet another DM thread.

Or not. Mods do what you will. I just don't see the reason to go another 100 pages not discussing the actual thread topic.

IQ looking Brolic.

Trade Grimes, and live with IQ's 44 foot 3 pointers

Is there anything else to discuss?

Toppin looks like he worked hard this offseason I’m excited

Richard4444 wrote:Is there anything else to discuss?

Absolutely. Have you seen the trade thread? Makes sense to have the usual back and forth about the trash team we have (and other nonsense)here and leave the trade thread for that purpose only.

Are We Ther Yet wrote:

Richard4444 wrote:Is there anything else to discuss?

Absolutely. Have you seen the trade thread? Makes sense to have the usual back and forth about the trash team we have (and other nonsense)here and leave the trade thread for that purpose only.

But everything is Donovan's Mitchell-related.

For instance.

Who is better Randle or RJ? You can say RJ or you can say Randle right now. But, it can change after we land Donovan"s.

We can discuss the weather. It's warm in NYC right now. But if we complete the trade for Donovan"s now, I believe it will snow in the middle of the summer...

Richard4444 wrote:

Are We Ther Yet wrote:

Richard4444 wrote:Is there anything else to discuss?

Absolutely. Have you seen the trade thread? Makes sense to have the usual back and forth about the trash team we have (and other nonsense)here and leave the trade thread for that purpose only.

But everything is Donovan's Mitchell-related.

For instance.

Who is better Randle or RJ? You can say RJ or you can say Randle right now. But, it can change after we land Donovan"s.

We can discuss the weather. It's warm in NYC right now. But if we complete the trade for Donovan"s now, I believe it will snow in the middle of the summer...

No...nothing is related to Mitchell as we haven't even had a new rumor in a month. The trade thread isn't even related to him because we are discussing RJ/Randle etc in regards to what they have done without Mitchell.

The idea is to discuss the trade in the trade thread and the gibberish in this thread. You can always drop these little nuggets of useful information in the trade thread if you wish. Go be a rebel!

Put the RJ is bad takes in here.

thebuzzardman wrote:IQ looking Brolic.

Trade Grimes, and live with IQ's 44 foot 3 pointers

Not an easy decision but I give the slight nudge to Grimes. I think he has the higher floor and not counting RJ is really the only two way shooting guard this team has. Plus he also has a small chance to be more than an elite 3& D because of that handle.

Fat Kat wrote:

Read on Twitter

Yeah but Burks has a higher TS on half as many shots per game

Clearly we traded away the superior player.

I hope RJ extension deal never happens just like the Batgirl movie.

No trade:

Brunson/Rose
Grimes/IQ
Fournier/RJ
Randle/Obi
Hartenstein/Mitch

DNP/CD: Cam\Sims\McBride


Westchester: That fat guy the Knicks drafted at 50 and that UDFA guy who won't make the league

thebuzzardman wrote:No trade:

Brunson/Rose
Grimes/IQ
Fournier/RJ
Randle/Obi
Hartenstein/Mitch

DNP/CD: Cam\Sims\McBride


Westchester: That fat guy the Knicks drafted at 50 and that UDFA guy who won't make the league

Bro you did a typo , you have RJ not starting

bearadonisdna wrote:

thebuzzardman wrote:No trade:

Brunson/Rose
Grimes/IQ
Fournier/RJ
Randle/Obi
Hartenstein/Mitch

DNP/CD: Cam\Sims\McBride


Westchester: That fat guy the Knicks drafted at 50 and that UDFA guy who won't make the league

Bro you did a typo , you have RJ not starting

Fournier the better shooter for to spread the floor for Brunson

Should Mitch be forced to shoot 3 three pointers per game or lose $10M per year on his contract? I vote YES!

thebuzzardman wrote:

bearadonisdna wrote:

thebuzzardman wrote:No trade:

Brunson/Rose
Grimes/IQ
Fournier/RJ
Randle/Obi
Hartenstein/Mitch

DNP/CD: Cam\Sims\McBride


Westchester: That fat guy the Knicks drafted at 50 and that UDFA guy who won't make the league

Bro you did a typo , you have RJ not starting

Fournier the better shooter for to spread the floor for Brunson

We need that legendary ABL guy who would punch out guys trying to score!!!

thebuzzardman wrote:No trade:

Brunson/Rose
Grimes/IQ
Fournier/RJ
Randle/Obi
Hartenstein/Mitch

DNP/CD: Cam\Sims\McBride

Westchester: That fat guy the Knicks drafted at 50 and that UDFA guy who won't make the league

I’d love to see what happens with that starting lineup. I hope Thibs does some experimenting with the rotations in PS.