Esq-4 wrote:Nazrmohamed wrote:No
You're not gonna trade a legitimate allstar who plays 79 games a season for a player who plays 60. And that doesn't mean I don't want KP. I'm actually a huge supoorter of bringing him back but KP doesn't solve for replacement star player or upgraded star player.
KP solves for all those other players that could've stepped up. He solves for that C that half of you guys fawn over that cab hit a free throw and spread the floor. He solves for the things critics of Mitch want. And as a Mitch fan who feels he's underutilized KP actually solves for things I refuse to give up in the search to improve that position. Many fans will fix one problem and create a new one. So what I like about KP is he gives the critics that big who can create a little, can spread the floor, hit his FTs and you must defend, however his defense is right on par if not better than Mitch.
In fact I wonder for those who don't like Mitch why KP isn't the first name on the list. He checks every box we need from a C except for durability. And of course, I remember the drama of how he left, but if you could look past the drama, it could be a great move with Randle IN MIND. FOR a guy like Randle. Now he drives in, and the paint isn't conjested because KP is on the perimeter.
So for me a trade is more like Mitch, Toppin plus a first for KP
Brunson, Grimes,Barrett,Randle, KP
That's a pretty balanced lineup. I can't see a reason you WOULDNT wanna explore that other than some emotional response of simply not liking a players attitude or something like that
There is logic to swapping Mitch for KP from a NYK standpoint (although not necessarily from a WAS standpoint unless it's the best they can do.)
However, I still don't like RJ and Randle together. That is why I'd still look to move Randle. I'm choosing the younger one who showed up in the playoffs (mostly...) Might be some emotion to that position, but, hey, what can you do?
I'd say there's definitely emotion to it. RJ was perhaps our worst starter this season. He shot at 43% all year, often times taking more shots than points. He then followed that up with a lousy first two games vs the Cavs. What happened next was pretty awesome. Randle struggled and he stepped up for a few games. What people will forget is that his last two games vs Miami were subpar and over the course of the whole series do you know what his FG% was? Actually the playoffs I should say, ya know what his FG% was? It was 42%.
So even the very " showing up in the playoffs" attitude that everyone has, and myself included until I did some digging. Even that playoff run was somewhat of a farce. He didn't play so well if we're going by percentages and efficiency. In fact if Randle did the same thing we would've felt maybe alittle better from a box score standpoint but many would be pointing out how inefficient that was.
Ok ok nazr but that still doesn't account for RJ being younger. It's more acceptable for him cuz he's younger and makes far less money right? If you're rebuilding and wanna be in the lottery, sure. You always take the younger player. But the whole reason we're complaining is because apparently we expected to win. So age being the positive factor here is moot. We aren't in that grouping of teams where a 33 yr old who can play might be less desired than a 23 yr old who can't but might 5 yrs from now. Second, RJ is about to be paid. Starting next yr he's gonna make 24mil. You've lost all your argument about youth once said youth costs the same as established vets. Now he's a vet. Technically that is 100% true not just in feel but by definition. He'll be past his rookie deal. He'll be a vet. So there really should be no lesser expectation of RJ than with Julius.
So now with that said do you think and expect RJ to carry an entire team for an 82 game season, scouted by every opposing defense in the nba, fighting through double teams or against the other teams best defender? You can't possibly believe that. Now if we were talking about say.........Zion or Morant or even Anthony Edward's then sure. I could with a straight face say that upon acquiring any of those 3 players those guys can carry a team. And they'd probably lose no doubt but you could see it. Rj is a 3rd option whether we trade Julius or not. Julius can only be traded for another star. You couldn't do any sort of addition by subtraction trades unless one of the arriving players is better than RJ because RJ isn't even really the best player AFTER getting rid of Julius.
So my point is there can be many reasons to trade Julius. He's not untouchable for me. But please please please, do not make this a Julus Vs RJ battle because RJ isn't and won't be that dude.
In OPs original trade for KP, RJ would remain exactly where he is in terms of impact to this team and KP will step right into the role Randle left behind. Which is why I don't like it. I think KP is a 3rd option himself and RJ more of a 4rth. And that's why I'd rather trade Mirch, spare parts and picks for him