Page 1 of 15
PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:56 am
by Iron Mantis
Get well soon RJ

Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:57 am
by KnixtapeH20
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:57 am
by sol537
Bring Zion home
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:57 am
by RHODEY
We fell short because we're too short.
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:57 am
by 2010
RJ is that important now.
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:58 am
by Knick4Real
OH WELL...
We tried 
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:58 am
by dakomish23
Knicks needed a big somewhat efficient game from someone other than Brunson
Randle 7-19 FG 2-8 3PT
IQ 1-10 FG 1-2 3PT
Simply not good enough output to beat a top tier team
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:58 am
by TKKnicks1
Games like this show you why you need an alpha scorer that can consistently drop 25-30 points for you. When your offense goes stagnant, you give it to this player and have him create. We don't have that player. Boston does.
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:58 am
by KnixtapeH20
RHODEY wrote:We fell short because we're too short.
Josh Hart contract was such a Knicks move after the spark he gave us last season lol... all hype when he can't hit a 3 as we saw in the playoffs
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:59 am
by 2010
dakomish23 wrote:Knicks needed a big somewhat efficient game from someone other than Brunson
Randle 7-19 FG 2-8 3PT
IQ 1-10 FG 1-2 3PT
Simply not good enough output to beat a top tier team
We already regret that Hart contract.
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:59 am
by KnixtapeH20
TKKnicks1 wrote:Games like this show you why you need an alpha scorer that can consistently drop 25-30 points for you. When your offense goes stagnant, you give it to this player and have him create. We don't have that player. Boston does.
Uhhh we were missing him tonight
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:00 am
by 3toheadmelo
shouldve traded kp for their pick to get tatum. that is all
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:00 am
by Oscirus
wasnt iq supposed to be the celtics killer?
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:00 am
by RHODEY
KnixtapeH20 wrote:RHODEY wrote:We fell short because we're too short.
Josh Hart contract was such a Knicks move after the spark he gave us last season lol... all hype when he can't hit a 3 as we saw in the playoffs
He can hit it...but unfortunately his confidence in it is low.
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:00 am
by F N 11
If we continue to overrate Randle we will continue to suck. Knicks need to move on from Randle just like giants gotta move on from Jones and all these good old only on the team bc they nice people.
The entire end of our bench is unplayable.
Need a wing, back up PG, and a coach. Dude ran 8 man rotation.
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:01 am
by Capn'O
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:01 am
by Knicks Byke
Scalabrine was mad annoying tn.
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:01 am
by omerome
RHODEY wrote:We fell short because we're too short.
I REALLY don't understand the stupid decision of not getting legit size in the off-season. And to top it off, we also have so much redundancy on our team. We literally didn't have a wing all game today as Hart is really a guard masquerading as one.
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:02 am
by DaGawd
sol537 wrote:Bring Zion home
at this point… i just worry about a zion mitch front court
Re: PG: Knicks fall short in loss to Celts
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:03 am
by Oscirus
3toheadmelo wrote:shouldve traded kp for their pick to get tatum. that is all
Since we were never going to fire jackson after trading KP that wouldn't have been a thing, phoenix would've likely drafted tatum in that case.