HEZI wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:HEZI wrote:Monty has good reason to be upset, it looks like a terrible non call and his team got screwed. It balances out because Knicks got screwed in similar fashion a few weeks ago. The refs are horrible there’s no doubt about that but why did the Knicks put themselves in that position in the first place?
Also did we improve after the Pistons trade? So far it looks like a lateral move at best.
Was at the game. Refs were mostly "letting them play" all game, but Brunson got fouled a LOT and there were no calls.
Also, early on, and yes, part of this is how the Knicks were playing, but the FT disparity felt strongly tilted to the Pistons.
I think the team got "better" from the Pistons trade in the context of Bogs or Bogs/Burks playing specific roles on a healthy Knicks team in the playoffs.
My reasons to not like the trade are that I'm not sure this team will be healthy, at all, this year.
It's taking forever for OG to come back.
Randle, it's taking a long time for him to come back, I honestly think he's going to wind up needing surgery and not play, or he comes back and looks like sh*tty end of the year hurt Randle.
And if even just the Randle part is true, the team isn't really going anywhere in the playoffs.
On the other hand, Knicks needed to move Fournier for a player who the Knicks had control over for a year. Yes, they could have picked up Fournier's option and let him rot on the bench another year, but that's a really bad look and probably not realistic.
The fun part is when the Knicks don't make a trade this offseason with the picks.
Everyone assumes the Knicks are going to make a "big move"
Why?
Leon said "they'll build slowly and correctly" and "have the ability to get in on trades"
I think the following happens:
Knicks don't make a "big trade", they trade one of the 2024 picks into the future, so whatever team is pick short this draft but has future picks, and the Knicks draft a player with the other pick.
My thing is did we really improve though? I mean Grimes is better than Burks who stinks and Bojan is better than Fournier but in the role you described it sounds like we could have just played Fournier rather than just give him DNPs to pretty much get the same result, no? If these new guys aren’t providing much boost then it kind of makes the trade look bad because we gave up a young player and some 2nd rounders. Not a big deal but like I said at the moment it looks like a lateral move at best and there is still time left to find out if the trade will pay off eventually but at the moment I think we all expected more than what we have gotten. I’m more disappointed in Bojan because I knew Burks sucks but I expected more from Bojan but he’s really been bad defensively and offensively he seems to be pressing and forcing a lot too but it could be just adjusting to the new team and role.
I think Bogs is more playable than Fournier in the now, but particularly that Bogs is more a 3/4 than Fournier who is like a 3/2.
Well, neither of them can really guard anyone, but for substitutions.
And I think the Knicks felt they'd rather get what Bogs offers at the 3 and 4 backup, than ever letting Fournier backup 3 and 2.
Plus, bad look to extend Fournier and the trade is largely about having the right $ sized contract to put in a trade.
I think the team got slightly better offensively based on fit, and absolutely lost a point of attack defender in Grimes, but it might be the feeling that OG and Hart provide enough there, so they did it.
But yeah, I can see it being looked at as a wash.
It doesn't really feel like 2 players that will help the Knicks win while they are shorthanded.
IF that was the goal, it wasn't really a good trade.
If the goal is the playoffs, MAYBE it was a decent trade. Not even sure of that.