Hunter Biden found guilty
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:35 pm
I'm curious what some people think.
It's worth noting that his guilty charge had absolutely nothing to do with his laptop, or the job he got in the Ukraine, which was perfectly legal (Trumps kids made way more money off foreign deals than Hunter did).
But he was a drug addict and he bought a gun which required a form where he had to check a box "I'm not addicted to drugs", which he was at the time . . . so, it's kind of open and shut. When family members testify that he was smoking crack every 20 minutes and he bought a gun during that period, that's pretty open and shut on the guilty verdict.
But this is rare that a person is gone after by the DA for being a drug addict 6 years ago, long since reformed, and his wife threw away his gun, which . . . Hunter didn't do that, and apparently a homeless person found the gun in the trash. It's like a bad law and order episode.
And I'm sure Trump jizzed himself upon hearing the guilty verdict. . . . And I'm sure this will be a subject Trump will raise many times during the debate, which will be interesting. On the one hand, Trump will be crying "Witch hunt" for his guilty verdict, and just moments later, he'll be screaming "justice" for the Hunter Biden guilty verdict. You know Trump's going to go in both directions.
I still feel funny about selectively applied lawsuits. How many children of rich people did things similar to what Hunter did and were never charged? What's the message here, "don't run for president if you have a kid who does drugs" - is that really the standard we need, not the person's ability or integrity, but the other side will go after their kids if they win?
It'll be interesting to see what the Judge will do.
It's worth noting that I'm quite sure Trump could have pleaded out of his NY charges. He didn't want to.
Hunter reached a plea deal and was perfectly fine with pleading guilty, admitting his mistakes and getting a more standard, 2 years' probation sentence.
But a Trump appointed judge unraveled that. Getting involved and grilling both sides. Judge Maryellen Noreika, (Trump appointed) wanted this to go to trial. Aileen Cannon gets all the attention, but I question whether Judge Noreika is every bit as crooked and partisan/bias as Aileen. Her explanation "She wanted to be sure that justice was served" . . . so where is her involvement on the hundreds of cases that are pleaded out under her watch every year? This one was special to her. That makes her a bad judge.
I guess I'm just venting. Curious if anyone else has any thoughts. Any legal minds want to add to or correct anything I said?
It's worth noting that his guilty charge had absolutely nothing to do with his laptop, or the job he got in the Ukraine, which was perfectly legal (Trumps kids made way more money off foreign deals than Hunter did).
But he was a drug addict and he bought a gun which required a form where he had to check a box "I'm not addicted to drugs", which he was at the time . . . so, it's kind of open and shut. When family members testify that he was smoking crack every 20 minutes and he bought a gun during that period, that's pretty open and shut on the guilty verdict.
But this is rare that a person is gone after by the DA for being a drug addict 6 years ago, long since reformed, and his wife threw away his gun, which . . . Hunter didn't do that, and apparently a homeless person found the gun in the trash. It's like a bad law and order episode.
And I'm sure Trump jizzed himself upon hearing the guilty verdict. . . . And I'm sure this will be a subject Trump will raise many times during the debate, which will be interesting. On the one hand, Trump will be crying "Witch hunt" for his guilty verdict, and just moments later, he'll be screaming "justice" for the Hunter Biden guilty verdict. You know Trump's going to go in both directions.
I still feel funny about selectively applied lawsuits. How many children of rich people did things similar to what Hunter did and were never charged? What's the message here, "don't run for president if you have a kid who does drugs" - is that really the standard we need, not the person's ability or integrity, but the other side will go after their kids if they win?
It'll be interesting to see what the Judge will do.
It's worth noting that I'm quite sure Trump could have pleaded out of his NY charges. He didn't want to.
Hunter reached a plea deal and was perfectly fine with pleading guilty, admitting his mistakes and getting a more standard, 2 years' probation sentence.
But a Trump appointed judge unraveled that. Getting involved and grilling both sides. Judge Maryellen Noreika, (Trump appointed) wanted this to go to trial. Aileen Cannon gets all the attention, but I question whether Judge Noreika is every bit as crooked and partisan/bias as Aileen. Her explanation "She wanted to be sure that justice was served" . . . so where is her involvement on the hundreds of cases that are pleaded out under her watch every year? This one was special to her. That makes her a bad judge.
I guess I'm just venting. Curious if anyone else has any thoughts. Any legal minds want to add to or correct anything I said?