We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK, mpharris36
We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- 2010
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,642
- And1: 42,884
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
-
We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
8-MAN ROTATION
1: Brunson (35) / McBride (13)
2: Bridges (18) / DiVincenzo (30)
3: Anunoby (32) / Bridges (16)
4: Randle (17) / Hart (31)
5: Robinson (30) / Randle (18)
MINUTE DISTRIBUTION
Brunson – 35 mins
Randle – 35 mins
Bridges – 34 mins
Anunoby – 32 mins
Robinson – 30 mins
– – –
Hart – 31 mins
DiVincenzo – 30 mins
McBride – 13 mins
1: Brunson (35) / McBride (13)
2: Bridges (18) / DiVincenzo (30)
3: Anunoby (32) / Bridges (16)
4: Randle (17) / Hart (31)
5: Robinson (30) / Randle (18)
MINUTE DISTRIBUTION
Brunson – 35 mins
Randle – 35 mins
Bridges – 34 mins
Anunoby – 32 mins
Robinson – 30 mins
– – –
Hart – 31 mins
DiVincenzo – 30 mins
McBride – 13 mins

2024 & 2025 Bubble Champions (Repeat)
1: White | Nembhard | Smart
2: Sharpe | Wallace | Clark
3: Thompson | Dort | Rupert
4: Wembanyama | Green | Bol
5: Gobert | Drummond | Mamukelashvili
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
-
Moose
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,750
- And1: 1,689
- Joined: Feb 20, 2002
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
We need depth for injuries as well.
And Mitch may be more like a 28 minute per player. And you may want to try Randle at the 5, but it may be matchup dependant and maybe closer to 10 minutes than than 20 per game.
We'll see. What if it fails?
And Mitch may be more like a 28 minute per player. And you may want to try Randle at the 5, but it may be matchup dependant and maybe closer to 10 minutes than than 20 per game.
We'll see. What if it fails?
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
-
HarthorneWingo
- RealGM
- Posts: 97,546
- And1: 62,686
- Joined: May 16, 2005
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
2010 wrote:8-MAN ROTATION
1: Brunson (35) / McBride (13)
2: Bridges (18) / DiVincenzo (30)
3: Anunoby (32) / Bridges (16)
4: Randle (17) / Hart (31)
5: Robinson (30) / Randle (18)
MINUTE DISTRIBUTION
Brunson – 35 mins
Randle – 35 mins
Bridges – 34 mins
Anunoby – 32 mins
Robinson – 30 mins
– – –
Hart – 31 mins
DiVincenzo – 30 mins
McBride – 13 mins
We can play Precious 15-17 mpg at C.
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
-
Knicks365247
- Senior
- Posts: 676
- And1: 484
- Joined: Apr 11, 2020
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
Get Theis or Wagner. We absolutely need a backup center. Give a 1+1 with a player option if you need to.
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 82,463
- And1: 96,418
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
We need someone to keep Sims or Hawkpootie from starting 40 games

Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- Kampuchea
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,350
- And1: 9,295
- Joined: Oct 20, 2010
- Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrFOb_f7ubw
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- NoDopeOnSundays
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,418
- And1: 57,081
- Joined: Nov 22, 2005
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
Mitch has averaged 48 games played over the last 4 seasons, we need another center.
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- NoStatsGuy
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,187
- And1: 2,382
- Joined: Feb 14, 2010
- Location: Germany
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
yup if everybody plays 82 games we are fine. but we know thats not gonna be the case.
get precious or bitadze and see what happens with mitch, randle, sims and the 4th big we potentially sign. we can make moves in january or towards the deadline aswell. i trust leon to make something happen.
get precious or bitadze and see what happens with mitch, randle, sims and the 4th big we potentially sign. we can make moves in january or towards the deadline aswell. i trust leon to make something happen.
im bout dat action boss
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- KnicksGadfly
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,828
- And1: 19,388
- Joined: Jul 29, 2007
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
Damn I feel like you just proved we need 2 more centers
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
-
ForzaMetro
- Senior
- Posts: 715
- And1: 700
- Joined: Mar 19, 2017
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
IMO, Anunoby is effectively the backup 5. I picture him guarding the 5 in those minutes with Mitch off the floor, Randle stays at the 4, and you have Bridges and/or Hart as the lead point of attack defender.
I think you can definitely survive stretches with that configuration. Hell, I would’ve used it at times even if we retained IHart. But I wouldn’t want to be forced into it full time when Mitch gets injured or is in serious foul trouble. Still need a big body we can trust, whether Precious or someone else.
I think you can definitely survive stretches with that configuration. Hell, I would’ve used it at times even if we retained IHart. But I wouldn’t want to be forced into it full time when Mitch gets injured or is in serious foul trouble. Still need a big body we can trust, whether Precious or someone else.
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
-
WargamesX
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,850
- And1: 8,102
- Joined: Apr 10, 2017
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
This isn’t 2k where you can turn injuries off. Either they bring in someone or Sims is going to get around 18 minutes a game…. And they still need someone to be there 3rd string in case of injuries.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
Luke 15:3-7
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- Signature NYK
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,969
- And1: 630
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
Randle in drop coverage on Defense gonna give Thibs an aneurysm…
But death lineup vaguely similar to the Warriors on offense (bootleg version)
Randle = Draymond
OG = Iggy
Mikal = Barnes
Donte = Klay
Brunson = Steph
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But death lineup vaguely similar to the Warriors on offense (bootleg version)
Randle = Draymond
OG = Iggy
Mikal = Barnes
Donte = Klay
Brunson = Steph
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- aq_ua
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 21,902
- And1: 7,924
- Joined: May 08, 2002
- Location: Optimistic but realistic
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
Perhaps someone can clarify, but I understand the hard cap constraint only applies to this season, so we might just have to live with a placeholder at backup center and address the position come next offseason. There’s a minutes imbalance with the new addition - we’re heavy at the wing but now light in the front court. Another move seems inevitable but we need to remove the constraints first.
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- Jalen Bluntson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,506
- And1: 27,208
- Joined: Nov 07, 2012
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
-
WargamesX
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,850
- And1: 8,102
- Joined: Apr 10, 2017
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
aq_ua wrote:Perhaps someone can clarify, but I understand the hard cap constraint only applies to this season, so we might just have to live with a placeholder at backup center and address the position come next offseason. There’s a minutes imbalance with the new addition - we’re heavy at the wing but now light in the front court. Another move seems inevitable but we need to remove the constraints first.
Just cause they are not hardcapped next year doesn’t mean it will be easy to add players. Outside of using our draft picks (we have 1 2nd rounder) and signing vet min players there isn’t much we can do.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
Luke 15:3-7
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
-
cgmw
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,545
- And1: 10,445
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
- Location: Winning now since 1973
- Contact:
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
Thibs needs at least 3 seven footers because one of them will be injured at all times and 2 of the 3 will be injured for a quarter of the season.
And I know that people love to hope for new behavior from a stone, but Thibs will play a C for 48mpg for 82 games plus the preseason and playoffs.
And I know that people love to hope for new behavior from a stone, but Thibs will play a C for 48mpg for 82 games plus the preseason and playoffs.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- 2010
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,642
- And1: 42,884
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
NoStatsGuy wrote:yup if everybody plays 82 games we are fine. but we know thats not gonna be the case.
get precious or bitadze and see what happens with mitch, randle, sims and the 4th big we potentially sign. we can make moves in january or towards the deadline aswell. i trust leon to make something happen.
He’s been re-signed by Orlando.

2024 & 2025 Bubble Champions (Repeat)
1: White | Nembhard | Smart
2: Sharpe | Wallace | Clark
3: Thompson | Dort | Rupert
4: Wembanyama | Green | Bol
5: Gobert | Drummond | Mamukelashvili
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- j4remi
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 38,288
- And1: 20,293
- Joined: Jun 23, 2008
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
ForzaMetro wrote:IMO, Anunoby is effectively the backup 5. I picture him guarding the 5 in those minutes with Mitch off the floor, Randle stays at the 4, and you have Bridges and/or Hart as the lead point of attack defender.
I think you can definitely survive stretches with that configuration. Hell, I would’ve used it at times even if we retained IHart. But I wouldn’t want to be forced into it full time when Mitch gets injured or is in serious foul trouble. Still need a big body we can trust, whether Precious or someone else.
This is the key, IMO. OG can guard most 5's in this league, at least for 10-15 mins, and I'd hope it's not too stressful for him. I'd like to try and trade for Nick Richards or re-sign Precious for that extra body, and in case of injuries.
But I think a unit of Brunson/Mikal/OG/Randle with Donte or Hart in the extra spot, depending on the situation, should work.
PG- Haliburton | Schroder | Sasser
SG- Grimes | Dick | Bogdanovic
SF- Bridges | George
PF- Hunter |Strus| Fleming
C- Turner | Powell | Wiseman
SG- Grimes | Dick | Bogdanovic
SF- Bridges | George
PF- Hunter |Strus| Fleming
C- Turner | Powell | Wiseman
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- EnigmatiC
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,917
- And1: 1,597
- Joined: Mar 22, 2004
- Location: As the world turns I spread like germs
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
Honestly I would just bring back Precious at this point and see what develops into the season.
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
- F N 11
- RealGM
- Posts: 95,435
- And1: 68,188
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
- Contact:
-
Re: We Really Don’t Need Another Center (rotational proof)
Y’all gon learn, keep thinking them wings and never healthy Mitch gon save us all the time. Good center play took us to another level.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club

















