RealGM

Hartenstein
Randle
Bogdanovic
Divincenzo
Burks

I believe that would be the worst team in the league

No

Hatrick Ewing wrote:Hartenstein
Randle
Bogdanovic
Divincenzo
Burks

131 ppg allowed

103 scored

Easily a 60 win collection of players

No but that doesn't have to be a knock on them. They just aren't talented enough if that's your top 5.

When I saw the title--at first -I was like...wait..what?!!
Burks had his moments but did do much...
Bojan was better than decent...
Randle I cant speak on because I havent seen him much period but last year if OG alone was healthy we would have made it to the ECF... From what I can tell- if he's on the right team- surrounded by the right players he would make the play-offs

Now Divo can take over a game consistently with his shooting and decent defense, finishing and off ball play...

I think they could be a 8th seed if they stay healthy and fresh.

DiVincenzo will have the year of his life, Randle will be what he was before and the rest … I mean, come on…

Hatrick Ewing wrote:Hartenstein
Randle
Bogdanovic
Divincenzo
Burks

If you substitute Donkic for Burks and Jockic for Bogdanovich - yes.

no

Parraknick wrote:I believe that would be the worst team in the league

Really? Because a Knicks team with 2 of these 5 players and 3 worse players was a 4 seed. We've literally seen it

PF, C, and SG is good. PG and SF need substantial upgrades to make it.

Hatrick Ewing wrote:

Parraknick wrote:I believe that would be the worst team in the league

Really? Because a Knicks team with 2 of these 5 players and 3 worse players was a 4 seed. We've literally seen it

Yes, really.

I don’t dislike those guys but they are all flawed players and / or role players.

Who is consistently playing defence? Who is breaking down the D? But sure, Randle could average his 20/10/5 with abysmal 4th quarter efficiency

Depends on the bench... if they got Giannis, Jokic, Doncic off the bench, then yes.

Hatrick Ewing wrote:

Parraknick wrote:I believe that would be the worst team in the league

Really? Because a Knicks team with 2 of these 5 players and 3 worse players was a 4 seed. We've literally seen it

We saw a Knicks team with Burks at PG. It wasn’t pretty.

If you use the players lost since the beginning of last season

iHart
Randle
RJ
Divo
IQ

That might be a play in team meaning anywhere from 7-10

Randle took a worse team to the 4th seed so anything is possible

Capn'O wrote:PF, C, and SG is good. PG and SF need substantial upgrades to make it.

outside of Burks not being an actual PG that lineup would be the best bench unit in the league, though