RealGM

?s=46&t=bxju2fhKRgs9w-vljlsvkg

?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Love this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Leeeeeeeeeegoooooooooo !!!!!!!

Shams with the inside scoop again.

?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

"The Knicks have enough room for rookie vet minimum under the second apron." What is a ROOKIE VET contract? I didn't know there was such a thing. How many years before a vet qualifies for a regular vet minimum versus a rookie vet minimum?

Not impressed

meh

Boring

8516knicks wrote:"The Knicks have enough room for rookie vet minimum under the second apron." What is a ROOKIE VET contract? I didn't know there was such a thing. How many years before a vet qualifies for a regular vet minimum versus a rookie vet minimum?

Rookie vet is a guy like McCullars, right?

Who else on the Knicks might qualify? Hukporti or Dadiet? Both are under contract.
Pate?

Is there room for a two way still, or is that out?

Nice. He's a good add.

thebuzzardman wrote:

8516knicks wrote:"The Knicks have enough room for rookie vet minimum under the second apron." What is a ROOKIE VET contract? I didn't know there was such a thing. How many years before a vet qualifies for a regular vet minimum versus a rookie vet minimum?

Rookie vet is a guy like McCullars, right?

Who else on the Knicks might qualify? Hukporti or Dadiet? Both are under contract.
Pate?

Is there room for a two way still, or is that out?

?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

8516knicks wrote:"The Knicks have enough room for rookie vet minimum under the second apron." What is a ROOKIE VET contract? I didn't know there was such a thing. How many years before a vet qualifies for a regular vet minimum versus a rookie vet minimum?

Less than 2 years

SHAM GANG WE BACK UPPPPPPP!!!

thebuzzardman wrote:

8516knicks wrote:"The Knicks have enough room for rookie vet minimum under the second apron." What is a ROOKIE VET contract? I didn't know there was such a thing. How many years before a vet qualifies for a regular vet minimum versus a rookie vet minimum?

Rookie vet is a guy like McCullars, right?

Who else on the Knicks might qualify? Hukporti or Dadiet? Both are under contract.
Pate?

Is there room for a two way still, or is that out?

I could be wrong but I believe last year counted as a year of service for McCullar so he would get 1 year vet min deal which I don't believe the Knicks can fit under the 2nd apron after signing Shamet. It looks like the vet min for 1 year of service is $2,048,494. Zero years of service guys like Nnaji or Diawara could be signed for a vet min of $1,272,870.

Guys like Shamet with 2 years or more only count against the cap for the 2 year vet min of $2,296,274 even though he will be paid more than that for more years of service.

This was the plan all the time imo. Rest of it was pipe dreaming

So Clarkson it is…..can’t be worse than Payne!

I would have either used this slot on a big or went with a non guaranteed and waited for the buyout market.

Where is Shamet getting minutes with Clarkson/McBride on the roster. We need big man depth behind Mitchell Robinson.

It doesn't move the needle much big picture, but I would have played it differently and give the slot to Precious.

TheGreenArrow wrote:

thebuzzardman wrote:

8516knicks wrote:"The Knicks have enough room for rookie vet minimum under the second apron." What is a ROOKIE VET contract? I didn't know there was such a thing. How many years before a vet qualifies for a regular vet minimum versus a rookie vet minimum?

Rookie vet is a guy like McCullars, right?

Who else on the Knicks might qualify? Hukporti or Dadiet? Both are under contract.
Pate?

Is there room for a two way still, or is that out?

Read on Twitter

?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Garrison Matthews could beat out Landry Shamet in training camp.

Matthews shoots a slightly better 3pt shooting percentage, is one inch taller, and his wing span is 1 inch longer than Shamet.

Can Shamet overcome all these disadvantages? Stay tuned!

Thank god, now we won't have to hear Ben Simmon's name ever again.