Page 1 of 1
Shaq # 16 in Hollinger's PER
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 5:18 pm
by tommydee10
The guy is still good, regardless of those who think otherwise.
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 5:41 pm
by knicks82385
Doesn't matter if the team sucks.
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 5:42 pm
by fimslim3
Shaq is effective when he's on the court, but he lacks stamina to play over 30 minutes a game.
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 5:52 pm
by krustytheclown
hes not going to make the knicks any better
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 6:25 pm
by moocow007
Wade >>> the Knicks
Heat = Knicks
Shaq != the answer for NY.
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 6:27 pm
by Hardaway 10
Shaq who won't be back for weeks b/c of his bruised hip?
He says the doctors have told him to stayoutuntil it's 100% and he says it's currently 60%. Do you think he's rushing back to help a decimated Miami team? Heck no.
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 6:29 pm
by fimslim3
Watch Miami get the top pick this season and draft Rose.
Derrick Rose/Wade/Davis/Haslem/Shaq
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 6:31 pm
by moocow007
fimslim3 wrote:Watch Miami get the top pick this season and draft Rose.
Derrick Rose/Wade/Davis/Haslem/Shaq
Or worse, trade Davis and Jason Williams expiring contracts for a big contract and another 1st rounder (which ends up being lotto) and resulting in...
Derrick Rose/Wade/Beasley/Haslem/Shaq.
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 6:58 pm
by Deeeez Knicks
Miami is really a team we should look to deal with. They have a rich owner not afraid to spend, they are sturggling, Riley might be getting desperate to make 1 more run with Shaq and they have some expiring contracts.
I would look to send them some of these guys:
Randolph, Curry, Crawford....and maybe even we could package in Jeffries.
Like wouldnt Miami at least consider:
Crawford and Randolph
for
Jason Williams, Zo, Ricky Davis, filler and a future 1st rounder.
Maybe even try to throw Jeffries into the deal for Smush Parker.
This type of move could really set us up to rebuild.
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 7:09 pm
by mjhp911
They have a rich owner not afraid to spend, they are sturggling, Riley might be getting desperate to make 1 more run with Shaq and they have some expiring contracts.
Uhm, you might want to rethink that.
Shaq is done. He might be able to help a team like Dallas in the postseason, but his days are numbered. Look for
half a season more of serviceable center numbers from him, this season AND next. But he becomes a big and expensive coat/hat rack after that.
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 7:34 pm
by Flash3
Brad Lohaus wrote:Miami is really a team we should look to deal with. They have a rich owner not afraid to spend, they are sturggling, Riley might be getting desperate to make 1 more run with Shaq and they have some expiring contracts.
I would look to send them some of these guys:
Randolph, Curry, Crawford....and maybe even we could package in Jeffries.
Like wouldnt Miami at least consider:
Crawford and Randolph
for
Jason Williams, Zo, Ricky Davis, filler and a future 1st rounder.
Maybe even try to throw Jeffries into the deal for Smush Parker.
This type of move could really set us up to rebuild.
Miami doesn't have a 1st rounder to play around with at the moment, one's going to Minny pretty soon.
And why would Miami even give up a 1st rder to begin with when its getting 'nothing' in return? -- They are giving up expirings AND a 1st rounder for bloated contracts?
Miami's goal is to be UNDER the cap and with little to NO contracts under them in 2010 when Shaq is a FA so they can build a team around Wade.
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 8:16 pm
by Neb
#16? Ouch. Per strikes again.
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 9:14 pm
by Deeeez Knicks
Flash3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Miami doesn't have a 1st rounder to play around with at the moment, one's going to Minny pretty soon.
And why would Miami even give up a 1st rder to begin with when its getting 'nothing' in return? -- They are giving up expirings AND a 1st rounder for bloated contracts?
Miami's goal is to be UNDER the cap and with little to NO contracts under them in 2010 when Shaq is a FA so they can build a team around Wade.
Come on man....we'll throw in Jerome James too...he expires in 2010
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 9:35 pm
by StutterStep
Neb wrote:#16? Ouch. Per strikes again.
Re: Shaq # 16 in Hollinger's PER
Posted: Wed Jan 2, 2008 9:37 pm
by richardhutnik
tommydee10 wrote:The guy is still good, regardless of those who think otherwise.
In regards to your real point, "Shaq to NY, irregardless the cost", the answer is NO.
Now, when you can propose something that is a long-term answer for the Knicks ills, then please write.
- Rich