Page 1 of 2

OT: Milwaukee: Everyone Available except Yi and Bogut

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 10:55 pm
by GuyverADL
Among league executives, there

Re: OT: Milwaukee: Everyone Available except Yi and Bogut

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 10:59 pm
by StutterStep
optimusadl wrote:

I'd take:
Gadzuric, Villanueva

for

Curry and Morris/Balkman


GAWD you know nothing about basketball!!! :banghead: :banghead:

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 10:59 pm
by Manhattan Project
Why Charlie V? He is as soft as Curry and is just a example of the grass is greener on the other side argument. Gadz is nice, but makes no sense as long as Rose and James are on the payroll. Id like to get Simmons if we could move Crawford or Curry to clear payroll, but thats not happening.

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:00 pm
by cmaff051
Instead of trying to take players off the Bucks hands, we should take some notes from them about what they are going to do with an underachieving team..

Mil, a perfect trade partner?

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:04 pm
by NoLayupRule
Things are just as bad in Mil as they are here apparently
wiretap wrote:Among league executives, there

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:05 pm
by KnicksGadfly
heheh let's get their pick.

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:05 pm
by NoLayupRule
oops - merging

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:06 pm
by blueNorange
Why should we take their caca off of their hands??

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:09 pm
by NoLayupRule
Gadzuric is a skilled player. he plays excellent D, is exceptionally athletic and quick and blocks and rebounds. What dont you people like about that?

CV is not bad. Hes got good range, athleticism and can block shots. Think of a young Donyell Marshall.

mo Willaims is in many ways a young marbury but without the horrible attitude and the history {or the 20mil a year salary}

Mason is an incredible athlete and not that skilled but he is a very very good defender and knows how to play within his game. a good teammate

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:14 pm
by DDV
theyre in a weird spot

redds a damn good player but hes nto a 1 option on a great team

and hes still in his prime so they could get young talent in return for him

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:15 pm
by hoodie©
NoLayupRule wrote:Gadzuric is a skilled player.



:o :lol: :rofl: :rofl2:

edit: I like Gadzuric as well, But come on NLR..

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:18 pm
by cmaff051
[quote="hoodie

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:22 pm
by blueNorange
NoLayupRule wrote:Gadzuric is a skilled player. he plays excellent D, is exceptionally athletic and quick and blocks and rebounds. What dont you people like about that?
Really??

Then why has Gadzuric barely get any burn in his career?? Outside of that good year which was a fluke year, he's done nothing.

If he plays excellent defence, blocks shots, and rebounds then don't you think he'd play more than 10 minutes a game for only 20 games, since you know the Bucks are a horrendous interior team.

NoLayupRule wrote:CV is not bad. Hes got good range, athleticism and can block shots. Think of a young Donyell Marshall.
Please, Charlie stinks ... he's injured a lot. He's soft and makes Curry and Randolph look good on defense.

NoLayupRule wrote:mo Willaims is in many ways a young marbury but without the horrible attitude and the history {or the 20mil a year salary}
I like Mo Williams, I wanted him in the offseason ... I'd take him.

NoLayupRule wrote:Mason is an incredible athlete and not that skilled but he is a very very good defender and knows how to play within his game. a good teammate
I like Mason too but the Knicks have enough guys who can play defense but can't shoot.

Re: Mil, a perfect trade partner?

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:27 pm
by StutterStep
NoLayupRule wrote:Morris, Nate, Jones, Jeffires and Curry

for

CV, Mason, Gadzuric and Mo Willaims


NO trading young players.


Jones and Curry

FOR

Mason, Gadzuric

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:28 pm
by krustytheclown
we need a shooter in the worst way and if anything we need to trade for redd

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:38 pm
by StutterStep
marbury2curry wrote:we need a shooter in the worst way and if anything we need to trade for redd


Redd would be nice but it would take youngsters or picks to get him unless Milwaukee would do something crazy like this:

Redd, Gadz (swap of this year's first rounder)

for

Curry, Crawford, Balkman, (swap of this year's first rounder)

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:40 pm
by NoLayupRule
cmaff051 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



:lol:

NLR really loves Gadzuric, but what does that say about him when he only plays 10 minutes a game on the perennially mediocre Bucks?
well balkman, collins & chandler cant get PT in NY, do they suck? What about Lee? Hes underplayed.

Ok, 'Skilled' may not be the best adjective for Gadzuric but the kid brings effort, hustle and above all interior defense every night.

ill take that on this team

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:45 pm
by DDV
NoLayupRule wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

well balkman, collins & chandler cant get PT in NY, do they suck?


collins yes chandler we dont know

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:47 pm
by Clincher
NoLayupRule wrote:Gadzuric is a skilled player. he plays excellent D, is exceptionally athletic and quick and blocks and rebounds. What dont you people like about that?

I dont like Gadz's Jerome James esque contract, we dont need another bad deal like that.

Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:47 pm
by NoLayupRule
Collins doesnt suck. weve seen him play at a very high level for extended time.

what sucks is his coach and his confidence

you should be able to tell the difference