OT: Milwaukee: Everyone Available except Yi and Bogut
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 10:55 pm
Among league executives, there
Re: OT: Milwaukee: Everyone Available except Yi and Bogut
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 10:59 pm
optimusadl wrote:
I'd take:
Gadzuric, Villanueva
for
Curry and Morris/Balkman
GAWD you know nothing about basketball!!!
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 10:59 pm
Why Charlie V? He is as soft as Curry and is just a example of the grass is greener on the other side argument. Gadz is nice, but makes no sense as long as Rose and James are on the payroll. Id like to get Simmons if we could move Crawford or Curry to clear payroll, but thats not happening.
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:00 pm
Instead of trying to take players off the Bucks hands, we should take some notes from them about what they are going to do with an underachieving team..
Mil, a perfect trade partner?
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:04 pm
Things are just as bad in Mil as they are here apparently
wiretap wrote:Among league executives, there
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:05 pm
heheh let's get their pick.
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:05 pm
oops - merging
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:06 pm
Why should we take their caca off of their hands??
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:09 pm
Gadzuric is a skilled player. he plays excellent D, is exceptionally athletic and quick and blocks and rebounds. What dont you people like about that?
CV is not bad. Hes got good range, athleticism and can block shots. Think of a young Donyell Marshall.
mo Willaims is in many ways a young marbury but without the horrible attitude and the history {or the 20mil a year salary}
Mason is an incredible athlete and not that skilled but he is a very very good defender and knows how to play within his game. a good teammate
CV is not bad. Hes got good range, athleticism and can block shots. Think of a young Donyell Marshall.
mo Willaims is in many ways a young marbury but without the horrible attitude and the history {or the 20mil a year salary}
Mason is an incredible athlete and not that skilled but he is a very very good defender and knows how to play within his game. a good teammate
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:14 pm
theyre in a weird spot
redds a damn good player but hes nto a 1 option on a great team
and hes still in his prime so they could get young talent in return for him
redds a damn good player but hes nto a 1 option on a great team
and hes still in his prime so they could get young talent in return for him
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:15 pm
NoLayupRule wrote:Gadzuric is a skilled player.
edit: I like Gadzuric as well, But come on NLR..
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:18 pm
[quote="hoodie
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:22 pm
Really??NoLayupRule wrote:Gadzuric is a skilled player. he plays excellent D, is exceptionally athletic and quick and blocks and rebounds. What dont you people like about that?
Then why has Gadzuric barely get any burn in his career?? Outside of that good year which was a fluke year, he's done nothing.
If he plays excellent defence, blocks shots, and rebounds then don't you think he'd play more than 10 minutes a game for only 20 games, since you know the Bucks are a horrendous interior team.
Please, Charlie stinks ... he's injured a lot. He's soft and makes Curry and Randolph look good on defense.NoLayupRule wrote:CV is not bad. Hes got good range, athleticism and can block shots. Think of a young Donyell Marshall.
I like Mo Williams, I wanted him in the offseason ... I'd take him.NoLayupRule wrote:mo Willaims is in many ways a young marbury but without the horrible attitude and the history {or the 20mil a year salary}
I like Mason too but the Knicks have enough guys who can play defense but can't shoot.NoLayupRule wrote:Mason is an incredible athlete and not that skilled but he is a very very good defender and knows how to play within his game. a good teammate
Re: Mil, a perfect trade partner?
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:27 pm
NoLayupRule wrote:Morris, Nate, Jones, Jeffires and Curry
for
CV, Mason, Gadzuric and Mo Willaims
NO trading young players.
Jones and Curry
FOR
Mason, Gadzuric
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:28 pm
we need a shooter in the worst way and if anything we need to trade for redd
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:38 pm
marbury2curry wrote:we need a shooter in the worst way and if anything we need to trade for redd
Redd would be nice but it would take youngsters or picks to get him unless Milwaukee would do something crazy like this:
Redd, Gadz (swap of this year's first rounder)
for
Curry, Crawford, Balkman, (swap of this year's first rounder)
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:40 pm
well balkman, collins & chandler cant get PT in NY, do they suck? What about Lee? Hes underplayed.cmaff051 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
NLR really loves Gadzuric, but what does that say about him when he only plays 10 minutes a game on the perennially mediocre Bucks?
Ok, 'Skilled' may not be the best adjective for Gadzuric but the kid brings effort, hustle and above all interior defense every night.
ill take that on this team
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:45 pm
NoLayupRule wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
well balkman, collins & chandler cant get PT in NY, do they suck?
collins yes chandler we dont know
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:47 pm
NoLayupRule wrote:Gadzuric is a skilled player. he plays excellent D, is exceptionally athletic and quick and blocks and rebounds. What dont you people like about that?
I dont like Gadz's Jerome James esque contract, we dont need another bad deal like that.
Posted: Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:47 pm
Collins doesnt suck. weve seen him play at a very high level for extended time.
what sucks is his coach and his confidence
you should be able to tell the difference
what sucks is his coach and his confidence
you should be able to tell the difference