In the four games Randolph has not played Curry is averaging:
22 pts and 8.8 rebs while shooting 63.0% from the field with a 67.7% ts% and 2.8 turnovers in 33 minutes of action.
Curry is a different player when Randolph does not play.
Curry's stats without Randolph
Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK, mpharris36
Curry's stats without Randolph
-
BornLoser
- Junior
- Posts: 424
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 25, 2005
- mjhp911
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 29,886
- And1: 14
- Joined: Aug 12, 2002
- Location: New York
StutterStep wrote:What is our record?
Then compare it with our record when ZBo plays and Curry doesn't.
Do the same for ZBo's stats!!
Or even do Z-Bo's stats when Curry is playing. They'll be pretty consistent. Z-Bo remains aggressive no matter what. Curry should be the same. He shouldn't use Z-Bo as an excuse to suck. We gave up the farm for him, fer cryin' out loud...
-
BornLoser
- Junior
- Posts: 424
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 25, 2005
StutterStep wrote:What is our record?
Then compare it with our record when ZBo plays and Curry doesn't.
Do the same for ZBo's stats!!
Our record in those four games is 0-4 but we have been in three of those games at the very end, including one in overtime. Also 3 of the 4 games have been on the road.
Zach has played one game without Curry and he also had a good game in which we beat a Nets team while they were missing Jason Kidd.
Zach had 25 points 6 rebounds while shooting 66.6% from the field with a 72.7% ts% and one turnover.
It seems both players are better without the other but the one game of Randolph's is less statistacally signifigant because he has not repeated it. Curry has had four good games without Randolph as opposed to Randolph having one good game without Curry.
Either way at least one needs to go. I vote Randolph if not both because Randolph is a cancer, that the team is already getting fed up with.
-
StutterStep
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,424
- And1: 58
- Joined: Jul 04, 2005
- Location: WAIVED
BornLoser wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Either way at least one needs to go. I vote Randolph if not both because Randolph is a cancer, that the team is already getting fed up with.
I think both has to go, but definitely Curry.
Randolph is a cancer because he plays hard every night and is better at everything than the players who complain about him. I have yet to hear Steph or Lee complain about Zach. It's usually QRich or Curry - our two least productive players.
-
BornLoser
- Junior
- Posts: 424
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 25, 2005
StutterStep wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I think both has to go, but definitely Curry.
Randolph is a cancer because he plays hard every night and is better at everything than the players who complain about him. I have yet to hear Steph or Lee complain about Zach. It's usually QRich or Curry - our two least productive players.
What about Roy and Jack both asking Portland to trade Zach.
At this point last year we were 15-21 without Zach but are 8-23 with Zach this year.
Portland was 13-20 last year with Zach but are 20-13 this year without Zach.
Is that a coincidence or perhaps Zach harms his teams with selfish offense and poor defense.
I am not saying we should nessessarily keep Curry, I am just saying we need to move Zach as fast as possible, then when Curry's stats improve possibly move him as well.
-
king_k4life
- Banned User
- Posts: 12,852
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 09, 2005
- NoLayupRule
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 48,099
- And1: 11,028
- Joined: Dec 06, 2002
- Location: Playoffs Fool!
- Contact:
people are always so egar to vilify one player or person as if there is a quick fix.
truth is tonight the team was self motivated, belived in eachother, hustled and didnt quit.
thats not one players absence or presence, thats a team thing. Most nights we dont have that, and most nights the players are just biding their time till the boos come down. But tonight, on the road, vs the champs, we had it. not enough of it but a lot of it.
truth is tonight the team was self motivated, belived in eachother, hustled and didnt quit.
thats not one players absence or presence, thats a team thing. Most nights we dont have that, and most nights the players are just biding their time till the boos come down. But tonight, on the road, vs the champs, we had it. not enough of it but a lot of it.






