Page 1 of 1
Who Calls the plays?
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:40 am
by general
Zack once again showed whenever he plays we lose Big..But My main question is Why was Crawford, 4 for 7 fg the 1st HAlf..2nd Half he got only 1 shot attempt?If Isiah is responsible for the play calling This really shows me He has No brain..Our leading scorer gets 1 play called for him The entire 2nd half...Just WOW.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:41 am
by king_k4life
What play's ?
And Hop off Crawford's man sack
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:42 am
by krustytheclown
uhh its not the nfl with an offensive and defensive cord.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:48 am
by general
We either went to eddy most of the game and he turned it over most of the time or we went to zach where that would lead to 3 defenders on him and he still puts up the bad shot...I would rather much see jamal go 1 on 1 for a whole Quarter then to give the ball to zach for a bucket..jamals chances are 80/20 when he drives.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 5:00 am
by Knick 4ever
The biggest mistake Isiah ever made whas when he decided to reduce Marbury's role in the offense. The cat is an offensive weapon that is currently not being used properly. When he was the main offensive person, we at least won more than 35 games. Why can't we just go back to that and add players around Marbury that can help push us over the hump? Since we've moved the ball away from Marbury, we have yet to win more than 33 games in the last 3 seasons.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 5:14 am
by TKKnicks1
marbury2curry wrote:uhh its not the nfl with an offensive and defensive cord.
Maybe it should be!

Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 5:25 am
by numbas
dolan calls the plays thomas has an ear piece in his hear and dolan gives him a play every offensive posession
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 5:26 am
by HKSVIP
Zach Randolph is better than Eddy Curry. IDK why everybody is saying different. Randolph got blocked and so did Curry. Randolph had TO's and so did Curry. Randolph hit his FT's Curry didn't. Zach can rebound Curry needs a dictionary to see WTF a rebound is. Curry and Zach are both good O players but they can't play defense especially when playing together. One needs to go and I say that ONE is Curry.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 5:29 am
by krustytheclown
TKKnicks1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Maybe it should be!

perhaps!
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 10:11 am
by gavran
Knick 4ever wrote:The biggest mistake Isiah ever made whas when he decided to reduce Marbury's role in the offense. The cat is an offensive weapon that is currently not being used properly. When he was the main offensive person, we at least won more than 35 games. Why can't we just go back to that and add players around Marbury that can help push us over the hump? Since we've moved the ball away from Marbury, we have yet to win more than 33 games in the last 3 seasons.
When Marbury was the #1 offensive player we won more than 35 games? What are you talking about? When was tha last time thise team won more than 33 games? In 2004, but with Steph in the lineup, it's still only 25 games won. Don't make up things, if your knowledge is short, just shut up.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 11:49 am
by duetta
The first big mistakes Isiah made was trading for Marbury. This idea that Marbury is somehow maligned or unappreciated is extremely funny.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 12:10 pm
by marik1234xx
We won 39 games with Marbury in 2004, and we were above .50 with him. Maybe you knowledge is short and you shouldn't be questioning him and get your ****in facts straight.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 12:16 pm
by Mad Mike
marik1234xx wrote:We won 39 games with Marbury in 2004, and we were above .50 with him. Maybe you knowledge is short and you shouldn't be questioning him and get your ****in facts straight.
your raving about 39 wins? wow imagine if this squad ever won 50 what would you do than?
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 12:37 pm
by gavran
marik1234xx wrote:We won 39 games with Marbury in 2004, and we were above .50 with him. Maybe you knowledge is short and you shouldn't be questioning him and get your ****in facts straight.
As I said, we won only 25 games with Marbury, because he was traded in January....no need to thank for the reading lesson, it was free.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 3:11 pm
by KnicksGadfly
general wrote:I would rather much see jamal go 1 on 1 for a whole Quarter
you made that clear the first 799 times you posted...
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:19 pm
by mildred
Knick 4ever wrote:The biggest mistake Isiah ever made whas when he decided to reduce Marbury's role in the offense. The cat is an offensive weapon that is currently not being used properly. When he was the main offensive person, we at least won more than 35 games. Why can't we just go back to that and add players around Marbury that can help push us over the hump? Since we've moved the ball away from Marbury, we have yet to win more than 33 games in the last 3 seasons.
Even though I'm no Marbury fan, I agree.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:35 pm
by Wrighteous
Knick 4ever wrote:The biggest mistake Isiah ever made whas when he decided to reduce Marbury's role in the offense. The cat is an offensive weapon that is currently not being used properly. When he was the main offensive person, we at least won more than 35 games. Why can't we just go back to that and add players around Marbury that can help push us over the hump? Since we've moved the ball away from Marbury, we have yet to win more than 33 games in the last 3 seasons.
I actually agree with you on this one. Marbury is our most efficient scorer, not Randolph or Curry.
Posted: Sun Jan 6, 2008 5:09 pm
by blueNorange
marik1234xx wrote:We won 39 games with Marbury in 2004, and we were above .50 with him. Maybe you knowledge is short and you shouldn't be questioning him and get your ****in facts straight.
You say Knicks were over .500 because of Marbury, I say Knicks were over .500 because of Mutombo.