Page 1 of 3

Stats like Zach Randolph

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:09 am
by randomhero423
Is anyone that similar to Zach Randolph, where the #s are very good, but the effect on the game is negative/non existent? I can't really think of one guy. (please let's not make this a "zach or curry" or "zach is underrated." thread. thanks)

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:10 am
by king_k4life
Shareef Abdu Rahim

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:13 am
by cmaff051
Ricky Davis

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:13 am
by Da_Mane_Man
basically any star player on a bad team will put up stats but the team will still lose. no one is like zach though. no matter who he has around him he will make that team worse.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:14 am
by blueNorange
The Knicks starting line-up.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:16 am
by randomhero423
that's what i mean though. not that double double guy on a lousy team. i meant a guy who puts up good stats but makes the team worse.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:17 am
by StutterStep
Gasol until Hubie, then again this year!

Al Jefferson last year and this year!

Should I continue and even go back to the past?

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:18 am
by StutterStep
Buck Williams when he was with the Nets.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:19 am
by StutterStep
randomhero423 wrote:that's what i mean though. not that double double guy on a lousy team. i meant a guy who puts up good stats but makes the team worse.


you're reaching son, you really are...

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:20 am
by randomhero423
StutterStep wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



you're reaching son, you really are...


then why did NYK look x10 better when he was suspended for that one game? they really looked like a team when he wasn't on the floor and at times even saw decent ball movement.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:21 am
by hoodie©
Zach's slowly turning into Antoine Walker, Terrified me seeing him starting to enjoy taking 3's.


Antoine's a Champion though.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:23 am
by Clincher
Troy Murphy(Though I like him alot) is a double double guy but was run out on GSW because he was one of the guys who made the team worse.

Id also nominate Richard Jefferson. Hes a solid 3rd option in a team but if he is the one who scores the pts for you and carries the team, the team will struggle(Like what NJ is this year compared to prior years)

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:24 am
by StutterStep
randomhero423 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



then why did NYK look x10 better when he was suspended for that one game? they really looked like a team when he wasn't on the floor and at times even saw decent ball movement.


They looked better because Curry came to play that night!!!

Why can't people understand that the other guys cannot lug his heavy non-productive a$$ over 82 games..

DA MN ALREADY!

This is the 3rd season, man --- this guys is the biggest problem we have!

OK, go ahead dump Zach's salary... and whatever! But until Curry comes to play CENTER every night, we will always be in the lottery.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:53 am
by LeBustJames
michael redd
abdul raheem
mitch richmond

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:02 am
by fimslim3
Clincher wrote:Troy Murphy(Though I like him alot) is a double double guy but was run out on GSW because he was one of the guys who made the team worse.

Id also nominate Richard Jefferson. Hes a solid 3rd option in a team but if he is the one who scores the pts for you and carries the team, the team will struggle(Like what NJ is this year compared to prior years)


Because Carter wasn't hurt this season and the Nets always start off on a hot-start????

GTFO.

Add Marbury to the list.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:42 am
by Clincher
fimslim3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Because Carter wasn't hurt this season and the Nets always start off on a hot-start????

GTFO.

Add Marbury to the list.

Carter has been playing alot of games the past 2 years though, and they were on a good start last season.

This is career highs for RJ.

I mean the Nets have went 2 for 2 in losses to the Knicks. Almost 1/4 of our wins have been vs that team led by RJ. :lol:

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:17 am
by fimslim3
Clincher wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Carter has been playing alot of games the past 2 years though, and they were on a good start last season.

This is career highs for RJ.

I mean the Nets have went 2 for 2 in losses to the Knicks. Almost 1/4 of our wins have been vs that team led by RJ. :lol:


You've failed to realize that RJ had to lead the team because Carter was hurt.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:36 am
by Clincher
fimslim3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



You've failed to realize that RJ had to lead the team because Carter was hurt.

I know he didnt have a choice but the team didnt do so great. When RJ was out 1-2 years ago for the season, Carter led the team and they did well if im not mistaken until they lost to eventual champs Miami.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:38 am
by duetta
StutterStep wrote:Buck Williams when he was with the Nets.


Really? I can't agree. Buck was arguably the best defensive forward in the league. When he talent around him, he won.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:45 am
by fimslim3
Clincher wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


I know he didnt have a choice but the team didnt do so great. When RJ was out 1-2 years ago for the season, Carter led the team and they did well if im not mistaken until they lost to eventual champs Miami.


Don't you think a Carter led team is better then an RJ led team 1-2 years ago??? Your pulling teeth here, your point is pathetic.