marbury2curry wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
green font?
Unnecessary, since it was clearly a sarcasm.
Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, mpharris36, GONYK, HerSports85
At The Mecca wrote:I can't believe people are actually talking about the Hughes deal. That deal is a joke and Isiah knows it. If they want to get rid of Hughes so bad and want Crawford in return...I'd consider it if they took on Zach as well in exchange for some expirings.
Something like this-
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=
...and their first rounder this year. They probably balk at giving up the first rounder though.
moocow007 wrote:Ohhh, ohhh I got it guys!!! I got the perfect solution!!!! Trade everyone on this team for draft picks, 1st round, 2nd round, 3rd round, it don't matter. Then we draft the perfect PG, the perfect SG, the perfect SF, the perfect PF and the perfect C and we're done. Sheer brilliance I tell ya!!! And to think we've had to suffer all these years when it was that simple.
At The Mecca wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Actually....you can joke all you want...but it kinda was that simple. Okay, maybe you can't call it simple....but think about what our lottery picks have been over the past 6 or so years. Sweetney and Frye. We traded so many other valuable picks...and on top of that...struggled to finish 12th and 13th in the east every year to boot. If we had just let contracts expire, swallowed some crow and basically tanked all of those years while keeping our picks....God only knows how good this team could have looked right now considering how many impact players have come out since then. We'd also be under the cap right now instead of trying to unload terrible contracts that we JUST traded for THIS SUMMER!
Like I said, it's easy to make a joke about it but can you honestly say Isiah's plan worked out for the better? Would we not have been in a much better position had we taken the other route? I think that when people are talking about trading for expirings and picks...they aren't saying "hey, this is a simple and easy plan to win a championship". They're saying "it's an infinitely better plan than we have right now....we should have been doing it all along....and we're willing to wait so lets just finally do it".
At The Mecca wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Actually....you can joke all you want...but it kinda was that simple. Okay, maybe you can't call it simple....but think about what our lottery picks have been over the past 6 or so years. Sweetney and Frye. We traded so many other valuable picks...and on top of that...struggled to finish 12th and 13th in the east every year to boot.
If we had just let contracts expire, swallowed some crow and basically tanked all of those years while keeping our picks....
God only knows how good this team could have looked right now considering how many impact players have come out since then. We'd also be under the cap right now instead of trying to unload terrible contracts that we JUST traded for THIS SUMMER!
Like I said, it's easy to make a joke about it but can you honestly say Isiah's plan worked out for the better? Would we not have been in a much better position had we taken the other route? I think that when people are talking about trading for expirings and picks...they aren't saying "hey, this is a simple and easy plan to win a championship". They're saying "it's an infinitely better plan than we have right now....we should have been doing it all along....and we're willing to wait so lets just finally do it".
Jemini80 wrote:i bet isiah accepts this deal if we win 10 games in a row.
Jemini80 wrote:i bet isiah accepts this deal if we win 10 games in a row.
Brad Lohaus wrote:Its usually a good thing when Isiah isnt jumping at deals.
Does anyone think its possible that Dolan has restricted Isiah from making deals?
clear wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I'm sorry, but does it occur to anyone that the opening sentence from the Post article is both grammatically and logically f---ed? Why lead with "though?" Doesn't the fact that Thomas is "turning down deals left and right" support his statements that he doesn't want to make a trade? And for the love of god, "there has been various reports"? Have been, Berman, you f---ing no-talent, Marbury jock-riding sad sack. Does the Post simply have no editors? Is this why they can afford to sell their rag for a quarter?
moocow007 wrote:Ohhh, ohhh I got it guys!!! I got the perfect solution!!!! Trade everyone on this team for draft picks, 1st round, 2nd round, 3rd round, it don't matter. Then we draft the perfect PG, the perfect SG, the perfect SF, the perfect PF and the perfect C and we're done. Sheer brilliance I tell ya!!! And to think we've had to suffer all these years when it was that simple.
kosmovitelli wrote:So I don't really know why we hear daily rumors about all those rejected deals.
Ignitowsky wrote:Just another thought about the timing of getting Ron.
If he REALLY wants to be in NY and will REALLY take the MLE (next summer) to be here, we have all the power. If we trade for him now then he's already here, his contract will expire, and if we want to keep him after giving something up for him (insert whatever young talent that you like) we may very well have to give him more than MLE money if he demands it. I'm not sure what his market value will be as a FA, but it's guaranteed to be double the MLE, maybe more.
Think about it. The smartest thing to do now is to do nothing.