Not going to Giants board for this. Can they....

VinnyTheMick · Post #21 » by **VinnyTheMick** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:17 pm

Jemini80 wrote:pretty sure the Steelers winning the SB as the 6th seed is a superbowl run that compares to this and trumps it.

DaGoodz · Post #22 » by **DaGoodz** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:21 pm

Jemini80 wrote:pretty sure the Steelers winning the SB as the 6th seed is a superbowl run that compares to this and trumps it.

True, that one comes close.
But the only great team the Steelers considered to beat were the Colts. The Broncos were quarterbacked by Jake Plummer. Come on beating Jake Plummer and beating Brett Favre in the championship game are two different things. And their stadium doesn't have the history of Lambeau. And Also the steelers faced the Seahawks in the superbowl. The Giants would be mostly be facing what many would perceive to be the greatest team of all time in the undefeated Patriots.
It isn't close, this would be better by far

VinnyTheMick · Post #23 » by **VinnyTheMick** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:32 pm

DaGoodz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

True, that one comes close.
But the only great team the Steelers considered to beat were the Colts. The Broncos were quarterbacked by Jake Plummer. Come on beating Jake Plummer and beating Brett Favre in the championship game are two different things. And their stadium doesn't have the history of Lambeau. And Also the steelers faced the Seahawks in the superbowl. The Giants would be mostly be facing what many would perceive to be the greatest team of all time in the undefeated Patriots.
It isn't close, this would be better by far

Slow down. The season could very easily end Sunday.

krustytheclown · Post #24 » by **krustytheclown** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:32 pm

dont get all excited the giants are gunna get blown out

VinnyTheMick · Post #25 » by **VinnyTheMick** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:35 pm

marbury2curry wrote:dont get all excited the giants are gunna get blown out

If they lose by less than 10 points you must change your name to JacobsDirtyStrap

Jemini80 · Post #26 » by **Jemini80** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:40 pm

the score doesn't always show if it is a blow out or not.

the score could be 9-0 and it could have been a blow out.

adjacent2bench · Post #27 » by **adjacent2bench** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:47 pm

I'm nervous as ****. And the worst part is the game time. 6:30 pm? That's like eternity I think I'm just gonna sleep after church til 5.

VinnyTheMick · Post #28 » by **VinnyTheMick** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:48 pm

Jemini80 wrote:the score doesn't always show if it is a blow out or not.

the score could be 9-0 and it could have been a blow out.

Fine. Regardless, if it is not a blowout then Marbury2Curry must change his name to JacobsDirtyStrap. The guy needs a name change anyway since both players in his name are most likely gone after this season.

adjacent2bench · Post #29 » by **adjacent2bench** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:44 pm

This weekend can potentially be horrible. If the Giants lose, and the next day the Knicks get blown the **** out by the Celtics @ MSG, with school coming back as well, it can be hell.

Johnny Hoops · Post #30 » by **Johnny Hoops** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:53 pm

They need to be the aggressor on both O and D.

I'm fearful that their offensive game plan may be too conservative and combined with the weather we could peter out.

I'd love to see a good mix with us taking some calculated chances.

To me it comes down to -- Can we bring more intensity to the game than the Packers?

I'm hopeful but by no means confident that we can win.