Wallace/Noah for Zach/Fred Jones.
Would we need to sweeten the deal?
They get cap relief immediatly in Jones but take on 1 extra year in Zach, but they need what he offers. We get Noah, who could be great long term and Wallace who may resurect Curry and if nothing else is one year shoter than Zach.
We could spice it up by adding Balkman and I may still pull trigger.
OT:Simple Chi/NY
Moderators: mpharris36, GONYK, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule
OT:Simple Chi/NY
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,923
- And1: 38
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: :noitacoL
- blueNorange
- Knicks Forum Contrarian
- Posts: 52,872
- And1: 19,884
- Joined: Jul 29, 2005
- Location: mgmt: caa
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,951
- And1: 35
- Joined: Apr 11, 2007
- Location: New York
Ignitowsky wrote:no thanks
Wallace would just be in Curry's way, and Noah is redendant. I think we can get more for Zach.
First off, it's redundant....and second off, Noah is anything but redundant. He's a center that can rebound and play pretty good defense. If the Knicks have that already, then there's no war in Iraq, and I've been banging Jessica Alba since highschool.
I'd do this deal in a split second. Bulls won't. They'd have a huge hole at center.
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,923
- And1: 38
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: :noitacoL
At The Mecca wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
First off, it's redundant....and second off, Noah is anything but redundant. He's a center that can rebound and play pretty good defense. If the Knicks have that already, then there's no war in Iraq, and I've been banging Jessica Alba since highschool.
I'd do this deal in a split second. Bulls won't. They'd have a huge hole at center.
Are you saying they WANT Big Snacks as well? We can arrange that.
- KnicksGadfly
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,680
- And1: 13,616
- Joined: Jul 29, 2007