ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:jezzerinho wrote:ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:The only player who benefits from Cole's playing style is Cole.
This is empirically not true.
Maybe we need to go back and watch him be the starting point guard last year and the beginning of this year before he was hurt. Cole does not set people up, he gives them the ball with 3 seconds left on the shot clock.
This isn't true at all. He is not a great playmaker by any means, but to say he "does not set people up" and only gives up the ball when the shot clock is down is absurd. If he was that incompetent as a PG, our bench wouldn't be so good against other teams' benches when he plays. PG is the deepest position in the league by some margin.
Last season the team was blatantly tanking and was in an injury crisis almost all year. This year he started only 4 games early on, when we had plenty of players missing again. I don't think this proves he can never be a solid starting PG.
And it's not like his competition for the starting role is prime Chris Paul. None of our PG are all that good at setting people up and all of them have significant flaws to their game. Fultz is a scorer first too. He can make fancy passes once in a whole, his drive and kick game is good and he is quite good in transition, but in the halfcourt he is pretty mediocre and he is downright terrible at running a pick and roll.
Right now all of out PGs are best suited for a bench role, but I don't think making Cole a starter would lead to worse results and could be an improvement.