MartinsIzAfraud wrote:mattdelray1220 wrote:MartinsIzAfraud wrote:you package 8 & future pick+ whatever else to go get Miller at 3.
I see this potentially happening if we land lets say 7 and 11.
What if the price was 8 and Suggs?
I'd push for 8 & Fultz or Cole before Suggs.
I wouldn't give Suggs and a high pick in a deep draft for a guy who will backup Franz...neither one is a full-time 2. They're not.
I'd love to draft Miller as BPA if Scoot is gone, but I don't agree with the idea of trading multiple assets for him. I just don't see the fit, despite the talent. Just looking at the mocks, it feels like (if we have 2 picks) the first one is for depth and upside (probably a forward) and #11 should get us the shooter we need at the 2 spot...if we only have one pick and it's around 6, we're in a bit of a weird spot...I don't see the guys there as ideal fits vs our needs.
This is a GREAT year to have one pick for need and one for aiming higher long-term.