ImageImageImageImage

From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023)

Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass

basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 36,250
And1: 14,201
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#41 » by basketballRob » Mon Nov 13, 2023 4:56 pm

AaronB wrote:There are a number of reasons for the improvement:

Paolo playing more point forward. Fran was moved to PG last year and it did not go well. Paolo is much better in the initiator role.

Suggs was injured last year and even when he played, he played injured. This year he is much better and more healthy.

Fultz has been in and out as opposed to out completely.

Black is a really good player for this team. Still wish they had taken Lively over Howard. I could eat those words some day, but Lively is going to be pretty good and a replacement for when Isaac goes down.
Lively was already gone.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
AaronB
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,522
And1: 661
Joined: Sep 28, 2021

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#42 » by AaronB » Mon Nov 13, 2023 6:05 pm

basketballRob wrote:
AaronB wrote:There are a number of reasons for the improvement:

Paolo playing more point forward. Fran was moved to PG last year and it did not go well. Paolo is much better in the initiator role.

Suggs was injured last year and even when he played, he played injured. This year he is much better and more healthy.

Fultz has been in and out as opposed to out completely.

Black is a really good player for this team. Still wish they had taken Lively over Howard. I could eat those words some day, but Lively is going to be pretty good and a replacement for when Isaac goes down.
Lively was already gone.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Really???

That you would post this without an ounce of evidence is disappointing.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,146
And1: 29,333
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#43 » by Knightro » Mon Nov 13, 2023 6:19 pm

AaronB wrote:Really???

That you would post this without an ounce of evidence is disappointing.


Rob is incorrect and you are correct.

Yes, the Mavericks and Thunder did have an agreed 10 for 12 trade in hand, but the Magic absolutely *could* have blown up their trade and picked Lively at 11 if they were so inclined and there's nothing Dallas or Oklahoma City could have done about it.

The Magic chose Jett Howard over Derek Lively, that is 100% factual information.
yoyojw17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,809
And1: 3,441
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Location: Gainesville,FL
 

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#44 » by yoyojw17 » Mon Nov 13, 2023 6:28 pm

Knightro wrote:
AaronB wrote:Really???

That you would post this without an ounce of evidence is disappointing.


Rob is incorrect and you are correct.

Yes, the Mavericks and Thunder did have an agreed 10 for 12 trade in hand, but the Magic absolutely *could* have blown up their trade and picked Lively at 11 if they were so inclined and there's nothing Dallas or Oklahoma City could have done about it.

The Magic chose Jett Howard over Derek Lively, that is 100% factual information.

Or in a year or so.... we could have been like.... "Man i wish we had taken howard.... such a great shooter"

lol.... p.s. i was down for lively at 11 to shore up the backup center position too... and give us a different type of big... lob threat... shotblocking type. Even during an injured ceiling he was amazing in the defensive department... and YES as a low scorer drastically helped the offensive efficiency of the team. But we will see what happens.
AaronB
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,522
And1: 661
Joined: Sep 28, 2021

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#45 » by AaronB » Mon Nov 13, 2023 7:07 pm

Knightro wrote:
AaronB wrote:Really???

That you would post this without an ounce of evidence is disappointing.


Rob is incorrect and you are correct.

Yes, the Mavericks and Thunder did have an agreed 10 for 12 trade in hand, but the Magic absolutely *could* have blown up their trade and picked Lively at 11 if they were so inclined and there's nothing Dallas or Oklahoma City could have done about it.

The Magic chose Jett Howard over Derek Lively, that is 100% factual information.


Of course, I knew what the right information was.

It just seemed odd to me that information that was so factually incorrect was posted so confidently.

It is the internet, all things are possible.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,354
And1: 8,421
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#46 » by Skybox » Mon Nov 13, 2023 7:18 pm

AaronB wrote:
Knightro wrote:
AaronB wrote:Really???

That you would post this without an ounce of evidence is disappointing.


Rob is incorrect and you are correct.

Yes, the Mavericks and Thunder did have an agreed 10 for 12 trade in hand, but the Magic absolutely *could* have blown up their trade and picked Lively at 11 if they were so inclined and there's nothing Dallas or Oklahoma City could have done about it.

The Magic chose Jett Howard over Derek Lively, that is 100% factual information.


Of course, I knew what the right information was.

It just seemed odd to me that information that was so factually incorrect was posted so confidently.

It is the internet, all things are possible.


you said disappointing...not surprising though :lol:
User avatar
Ducklett
General Manager
Posts: 8,030
And1: 5,495
Joined: Jul 17, 2012
 

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#47 » by Ducklett » Mon Nov 13, 2023 7:38 pm

Skybox wrote:
AaronB wrote:
Knightro wrote:
Rob is incorrect and you are correct.

Yes, the Mavericks and Thunder did have an agreed 10 for 12 trade in hand, but the Magic absolutely *could* have blown up their trade and picked Lively at 11 if they were so inclined and there's nothing Dallas or Oklahoma City could have done about it.

The Magic chose Jett Howard over Derek Lively, that is 100% factual information.


Of course, I knew what the right information was.

It just seemed odd to me that information that was so factually incorrect was posted so confidently.

It is the internet, all things are possible.


you said disappointing...not surprising though :lol:


This board would have riot if we took a second non-shooter at 11.
AaronB
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,522
And1: 661
Joined: Sep 28, 2021

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#48 » by AaronB » Mon Nov 13, 2023 7:54 pm

Ducklett wrote:
Skybox wrote:
AaronB wrote:
Of course, I knew what the right information was.

It just seemed odd to me that information that was so factually incorrect was posted so confidently.

It is the internet, all things are possible.


you said disappointing...not surprising though :lol:


This board would have riot if we took a second non-shooter at 11.


Probably very true and even true within the organization.

I still think Lively was a better fit for this roster, considering how many games the other bigs miss.

One more thing, it did not show up in games, but Lively has a really good shot in practice.

His form is surprisingly good in the videos that I saw.

I thought he was a much better talent than the guy the Warriors took at 2 or so a few years ago based on his workout videos.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 36,250
And1: 14,201
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#49 » by basketballRob » Mon Nov 13, 2023 7:56 pm

Ducklett wrote:
Skybox wrote:
AaronB wrote:
Of course, I knew what the right information was.

It just seemed odd to me that information that was so factually incorrect was posted so confidently.

It is the internet, all things are possible.


you said disappointing...not surprising though


This board would have riot if we took a second non-shooter at 11.
That was so long ago. I forget. I do know that I wanted us to pick Lively.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,156
And1: 7,768
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#50 » by RookieStar » Mon Nov 13, 2023 8:39 pm

magik9113 wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
drsd wrote:
5-5 with this starting five: Spencer Dinwiddie, Cam Thomas, Mikal Bridges, Royce O'Neale, Dorian Finney-Smith.

Classic vet team that will never get blow out, but lacks power and depth to win many games.

Playing the Nets is a great learning-test for the Magic. Orlando has more talent, but beating the Nets means keeping TOs low and controlling the tempo.

This is a 50/50 game for Orlando. The kind of game played over and over were the team can win by 5 many times, or lose by 20 many times. Time for school!


We ne3d to punish them down low. Claxton is still out right? That means there isnt a ahotblocker to intimidate the drives of Paolo Frans and Suggs.

DFS Simmons amd Cam are their PFs, i think they cant matchup pound for pound with Paolo.

Claxton played yesterday but Cam Thomas is out


Im talking about Cam Johnson... lol shouldve been clearer...
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,156
And1: 7,768
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#51 » by RookieStar » Mon Nov 13, 2023 8:57 pm

AaronB wrote:
Ducklett wrote:
Skybox wrote:
you said disappointing...not surprising though :lol:


This board would have riot if we took a second non-shooter at 11.


Probably very true and even true within the organization.

I still think Lively was a better fit for this roster, considering how many games the other bigs miss.

One more thing, it did not show up in games, but Lively has a really good shot in practice.

His form is surprisingly good in the videos that I saw.

I thought he was a much better talent than the guy the Warriors took at 2 or so a few years ago based on his workout videos.


I have a feeling our GMs don't really trust rookie C for this lineup unless they are generational. The Cs they always got had a few "seasons/pounds" under their belt like Moe and Goga.

Also... wish they would have gotten Keyonte!!! Guy is killing it and could have been a Cole replacement. lol
Edrock
Rookie
Posts: 1,239
And1: 217
Joined: Oct 10, 2007
   

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#52 » by Edrock » Mon Nov 13, 2023 9:08 pm

Technically, could still get to 5-20, why would you jinx it??!? :lol:
User avatar
eyriq
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 33,465
And1: 9,455
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Location: #TheLab
Contact:
 

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#53 » by eyriq » Mon Nov 13, 2023 9:16 pm

Edrock wrote:Technically, could still get to 5-20, why would you jinx it??!?
LMAO, I could not handle that
JoshuaPotter
Analyst
Posts: 3,513
And1: 998
Joined: Dec 19, 2022
   

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#54 » by JoshuaPotter » Tue Nov 14, 2023 4:36 pm

eyriq wrote:
Edrock wrote:Technically, could still get to 5-20, why would you jinx it??!?
LMAO, I could not handle that


Oh my.....
TheChaser
Analyst
Posts: 3,271
And1: 563
Joined: Feb 09, 2009
Location: Obviously not hanging out with John Hollinger.
       

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#55 » by TheChaser » Thu Nov 16, 2023 12:28 am

Please don’t be a jinx thread. Good god why did you do this before 6 wins???
maginno wrote:There is nothing wrong with this team that putting a few unloaded guns in Carter's gym bag will not solve.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 36,250
And1: 14,201
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#56 » by basketballRob » Thu Nov 16, 2023 12:56 am

Reminds me of when TMac said he was happy we made it out of the first round. Then Detroit put rookie Tashaun Prince on TMac and shut him down for 3 consecutive games, and they won the series.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,035
And1: 8,895
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#57 » by drsd » Thu Nov 16, 2023 7:50 am

Edrock wrote:Technically, could still get to 5-20, why would you jinx it??!? :lol:


Whew that was close.
TheChaser
Analyst
Posts: 3,271
And1: 563
Joined: Feb 09, 2009
Location: Obviously not hanging out with John Hollinger.
       

Re: From 5-20 to 5-4 (2022 to 2023) 

Post#58 » by TheChaser » Thu Nov 16, 2023 7:01 pm

drsd wrote:
Edrock wrote:Technically, could still get to 5-20, why would you jinx it??!? :lol:


Whew that was close.


Thank God we got to 6 haha
maginno wrote:There is nothing wrong with this team that putting a few unloaded guns in Carter's gym bag will not solve.

Return to Orlando Magic